ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

SXX Sirius Minerals Plc

5.49
0.00 (0.00%)
24 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Sirius Minerals Plc LSE:SXX London Ordinary Share GB00B0DG3H29 ORD 0.25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 5.49 5.485 5.49 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Sirius Minerals Share Discussion Threads

Showing 49801 to 49818 of 50600 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  2000  1999  1998  1997  1996  1995  1994  1993  1992  1991  1990  1989  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
20/1/2020
07:19
20/01/2020 7:00am

RNS Number : 2420A

Anglo American PLC Recommended cash acquisition for Sirius Minerals

johnwise
20/1/2020
07:19
20/01/2020 7:00am

RNS Number : 2420A

Anglo American PLC Recommended cash acquisition for Sirius Minerals

johnwise
19/1/2020
21:19
? :

'Even if it bids, Anglo won't be committing to develop the mine, making this an option of sorts.'

kreature
18/1/2020
20:22
I did say I would not post again but, hey, we are now into the end-game, so that warrants "special occasion" status.

As before, it is very difficult for us non-insiders to know what the background dynamics here are. So it is important to think for yourself, and judge how this may now play out:

1. For those lucky enough to have bought in before Xmas at around 3 pence, the safe option now is the sell and take a substantial profit;

2. But we were told that 'multiple parties' were involved, and we do not know at all much on those multiple parties; but there must now be some chance that a counter-bid will be made;

3. In fact, my feeling is that we needed at least TWO actively competing parties to trigger any deal which would be substantially above the 3.0 - 3.5 pence share price we had late last year; i.e. IF there were ONLY A SINGLE interested player then, as was pointed out repeatedly, they could just wait a while longer and save themselves 5.5 pence per share;

So I will continue to hold until at least the 2nd half of Feb, in the hope that we could see an improved offer price.

I also notice that there is hardly any mention of the Project Values here in the media or pretty much anywhere else, which feels odd. But reading the RNS put out by AA, it did sound awfully positive about the POLY4 product and the 50% EBITDA margins expected for a long-lasting asset.

So the bottom line here is that AA, and possibly one or two other players, do indeed see a substantial Project Value here:

- as an upper marker, we could use the numbers put out by Sirius in November - which effectively said $3.1bn of investment, followed by $14.1bn free-cash-flow coming back in = $11bn; some may point out that was based on 13mtpa, and that output could be substantially increased beyond that level in the future, but that is of no real import at this point in the game;

- and you might guess that AA would not be getting so directly involved here if they did not sense that they could generate a substantial amount of cash here;

- so, you can knock the Project Values around any which way you like;

- for example, maybe AA are thinking $3.1bn capital cost, and then getting back maybe $5.1bn in positive cash flow once the mine is up & running = $2bn net, so they think paying $500 million for that flies OK;

- but I would not personally invest $3.1bn now, to get $5.1bn back later; my sense is that a balanced & risk weighted view might be for sums of $(3.1)bn now, + $7.1bn coming back later = $4.0bn NET.

The above is just me playing around with some big numbers, but the main point here is that:
a) AA - and possibly one or two other players - will now have assessed how much cash the whole Sirius mine project can generate over the coming years - maybe they feel the project is a marginal one, maybe they judge they will end up clearing $2bn, or maybe they think a risk-weighted outcome will be much more than that - maybe, say, $4bn; that's still a fraction of the $11bn put out by Sirius themselves;

b) As a shareholder, my feeling is that a $4bn project value does not appear foolhardy, and I accept that any bidder will want to keep the bulk of that value for themselves. But - IF there are at least TWO players active here - then my own feeling is that SXX shareholders might expect the secure a slightly bigger slice of that overall $4bn pie.

I was 80% sure that buying SXX shares at 3.0 pence was a good idea, but my confidence that we will see a (materially) higher bid is, I'd say, maybe around the 50:50 mark. But that's enough to keep me holding until close to the end of Feb.

Anyway, think for yourself, and remember it aint over till it's over.

holidayfunds8
18/1/2020
17:36
Everyone seems completely lost here (or perhaps it's just me). The only certainty was the 5th Feb, until someone said actually it might be sooner. So now there's nothing but limbo. Investors can't be certain of 5.5, and shorters can't be bothered in case they get stuck with 5.5. Better off just suspending the shares. The uncertainty is off the scale. imo
kreature
18/1/2020
09:03
SS shorts down is not really that straight forward . Example they reduced dramatically in periods in KIE MTRO and even Carillon

Every circumstance unique. Haven't drilled down its relevance here but a general template of shorts reduced doesn't always mean price goes up

sentimentrules
18/1/2020
09:00
shanew4817 Jan '20 - 20:13 - 241 of 245

Will a definitive date of when the mine will be up and running be possible at some point this year? presumably if finance is due to be raised towards the end of this year then prospective investors/partners will want to be given an idea of when the mine will open before they pledge to invest?

Parob18 Jan '20 - 07:39 - 242 of 245

I would have thought they will have a better idea of timelines once the DFS is finalised. We are told this is on schedule for H1. In fact HL said they are ahead of schedule in the most recent interview (from 2 mins, 8 seconds) so I think we are looking at April or May for the DFS news and hopefully timings for production will come with it or soon after.




Parob18 Jan '20 - 08:11 - 243 of 245

Worth noting that in March 2019 Shard Capital had a share price target of 22p on completion of Feasibility study (see page 10 in this research note):

hxxps://www.emmersonplc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Shard-Capital-EML-21-3-2019.pdf

This was BEFORE news on the two additional projects.

Preliminary studies on two additional projects:

Sale of salt by product and the production of sulphate of potash.

Including these projects takes the total attributable NPV10 for Emmerson to over US$1.8bn, with life of mine average annual post tax free cash of around US$300m.

And BEFORE the 72% Resource Upgrade news in October:

(27/10/19) Emmerson Plc, the Moroccan focused potash development company, is pleased to announce an upgraded JORC compliant Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its 100% owned Khemisset Potash Project in Northern Morocco ("Khemisset" or "the Project"), delivering a 72% increase in total resource to 537 million tonnes ("Mt") of potash with an average grade of 9.24% K(2) O. To view the press release with the illustrative diagrams please use the following link:



mad foetus18 Jan '20 - 08:36 - 244 of 245

Also remember that EML is eligible for government subsidies that reduce project cost by 10%.

Parob18 Jan '20 - 08:42 - 245 of 245

Yep that’s right MF, that news came out in December, again after those share price targets were released in March when Shard had a target of 106p on first production. Would love to know what that’s gone up to following all these developments.

cpap man
17/1/2020
16:10
Dump SXX and buy EML

Simples!

cpap man
17/1/2020
13:10
Kreature The price is bang on it is telling you the market is about 80% sure the deal will go ahead at 5.5p with about 10% that AA will walk away and the company will then enter administration, it also allows about 10% for a higher offer to come along.
dp1umb
17/1/2020
12:11
Why wouldn’t AA lower their ‘discussion217; to say 1p? They could probably name their price, and the share price would probably follow. The current share price feels highly artificial to me. Isn’t the current share price only built on a ‘maybe’ ?
kreature
17/1/2020
09:25
The extremely exciting prospects @ EML are obviously attracting investors to EML

The Uber bullish chart patterns @ EML must obviously also be really rather helpful to EML

cpap man
16/1/2020
23:55
Thanks for the link, have to make plastic heavier.
kreature
16/1/2020
01:17
AA probably a good fit as they have previous experience of tunnel boring an even wider tunnel in 2015, see youtube.
kreature
15/1/2020
21:28
Some you win and some you lose...I'll wait for AA to pick my share on the cheap...
beeezzz
15/1/2020
20:56
11 percent where’s John gone?
dp1umb
15/1/2020
19:24
dp1umb
13 Jan '20 - 10:33 - 46629 of 46662
0 2 0
I see there’s a proposed bid of 5.5p
To my detractors (you know who you are)
Just check my post on Dec the 5th!!
John Carla any thoughts?

========

John / Carla any thoughts?

Definitely not......low IQs.....incapable of any thought.

11_percent
15/1/2020
14:47
It was the diagram of how deep those Shafts have to beMind boggles.
amaretto1
15/1/2020
14:46
i for one listened .. saved me a small fortune.... traded it ever sinceCheers MS K under pressure.
amaretto1
Chat Pages: Latest  2000  1999  1998  1997  1996  1995  1994  1993  1992  1991  1990  1989  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock