We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.45 | -3.88% | 35.90 | 35.90 | 36.00 | 38.50 | 35.90 | 36.40 | 2,364,215 | 15:16:13 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0016 | -228.44 | 331.58M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/10/2021 09:40 | winner - that's a bit rich given your many personal attacks on me. | forwood | |
27/10/2021 09:24 | Metalbee. I’m not sure whether it’s a true reflection of your personality but in my opinion you come across as a self righteous, arrogant person that lacks empathy and is just about as far from humble as is possible. In my opinion, however do your own research | winner66 | |
27/10/2021 09:12 | I'll make you a deal, you stop with your rubbish with regards to anyone and I'll go back to pretending you don't exist. | metalbee | |
27/10/2021 08:57 | Metalbee , sure I accept that , but an opinion is different from a statement. Cease and desist regarding personal inflammatory statements. | winner66 | |
27/10/2021 08:48 | All I can do is call it how I see it, that applies to charts and to you. | metalbee | |
27/10/2021 08:39 | Metalbee, I would discourage you from personal attack. I’m not a fool , you are not qualified to judge as you do not know me. Additionally , a chat board is not sophisticated, it’s no doubt got every cross section of society who would be interested in investing. None of us are qualified to know who reads posts. I just suggest caution with regard to coming across as an expert . That’s all | winner66 | |
27/10/2021 08:26 | Anyone who acts on "advice" that they "don't understand" is a fool and should not be factored into any reasonable way of thinking when talking about investing. Additionally, Winner66 is a fool, and should not be factored into any reasonable way of thinking when talking about investing. Forwood: Pitchfork idea has indeed broken the central line, would want to see a bounce off the next one to validate the pattern. | metalbee | |
27/10/2021 08:20 | Rubbish Winner. This is one of the most sophisticated boards on ADVFN, bar one or two I could mention. | forwood | |
27/10/2021 08:14 | Forwood just do your own thing. If you post chart views the way you do it’s testament to advice and that’s not fair on people that wouldn’t understand. | winner66 | |
27/10/2021 08:09 | Well, we've already had the fatuous comments from the usual suspects! | forwood | |
27/10/2021 07:51 | Absolutely amazing if we can get through the day without any chart drivel | winner66 | |
26/10/2021 22:42 | Thank you also Scot for your continued expert analysis. I completely agree that the PANR BOD will have all the various pieces of the winter testing programme in hand alongside ongoing funding negotiations. PANR are "laser focussed" (their words not mine) on getting the job done. Can't ask for more than that. | steved | |
26/10/2021 22:23 | Thanks Scot for your post. I am pleased to still be waiting for a funding announcement in late October. This for me is a sign that the BoD is negotiating this down to the wire - as any good negotiating team would do. I also suspect a farmout is more likely than a placing although the thought of the latter may have dented the share price lately. I recall the market response after last year's placing though - it was pretty quick and positive - this year PANR is in a better place as is the wider O&G market so I would expect an even stronger share price reaction post-funding. | zeusfurla | |
26/10/2021 20:03 | Scott126 - many thanks for your soothing comments. Certainly I agree that the environment for the negotiations is better than in the past couple of years. A medium term price for crude of $65/brl seems pretty conservative in the light of the energy demands in India and China (combined populations of 2.7 billion compared with about 800 milion in North America and Western Europe) which will have to be satisfied with more coal, oil and gas. No-one builds coal fired generators expecting them to be redundant within 15 years. And I agree with you that we should be able to rely on the BoD to secure the least dilutive financing - farm-in v equity raise. Intellgentia8 - thanks for your helpful reference on CNN. | responsible investor | |
26/10/2021 19:21 | On another note worth watching this short clip : CNN: Energy crisis will set off social unrest, private-equity billionaire warns. | inteligentia8 | |
26/10/2021 17:53 | Spot on Winner66, couldn't have summed it up better!.... :-) | nigoil | |
26/10/2021 17:43 | Every post on here could be considered to be of self interest . Forwood I think the problem some people have but not all is that the tone of your posts could create a feeling amongst the less or no experienced investor that you are some kind of guru. I offer this and it’s on every spread bet and cfd companies small print. 70 percent of people loose money trading. If your objective is short term swing trades then the point is the market has a 70 percent chance of taking your money . However if there is no need for short term sell , then research is key . If you like what you see research wise then take a position and be invested for the medium term at least . That way the market has less chance of taking your money . | winner66 | |
26/10/2021 17:32 | You're like a stuck gramaphone record forwood! WE have no problem with traders as WE trade! The difference between US and you is that WE don't have an agenda and WE don't feel the need to keep telling every man and his dog how good WE are!... :-) | nigoil | |
26/10/2021 17:29 | Sorry responsible investor. I fully agree with you. I don't like ad hominem attacks but I don't feel I can ignore them either. I probably can't say any more than in the post above, so let's hope my detractors accept it and give over. | forwood | |
26/10/2021 17:20 | Oh really, pos, what I said is that EVERYONE talks their book! It's hard for anyone not to be biassed in the direction of their pecuniary interest. But let me make myself clear, yet again, I simply point out what I see as the direction of travel. And there have been umpteen occasions in the past when I have pointed out the potential increase in price,again based on the charts. I don't think anyone complained then or questioned my motives. Because I am a technical trader, I am often positioned accordingly. So when I see the charts suggesting a fall, I will point that out. I find those who then object to those posts in personal terms rather than technical or fundamental arguments, because they wish to see the price increase, as somewhat perverse, as well as rude. I was also frankly angered by your ascribing certain motives to me along with a spurious argument presenting it as a moral issue, as there is nothing moral about it. Moreover, unless you are blaming me for all the downside moves in the past week or so, what I have pointed out could be seen to be helpful to those who wish to preserve, if not enhance, their capital position, which is the whole object of investment here. In denying my observations or encouraging people to ignore them, you could be said to be doing them a disservice. If you thought this morning's post was subtly arguing for a fall, then you are mistaken, as I genuinely did not know which way the price would move. The fact that it has fallen and that daily MACD appears to have resumed its downside move, while the up trending stochastics appears to be checked, does point to continued weakness. I say 'appears' because again it is not sufficiently clear. There is no way I could argue a negative case if there wasn't a supporting technical position. Some have criticised the insights and said I don't present the whole story. My own skills on the technical side are broadly limited to those I talk about, as I think I've been clear to say in the past. But so far as I am aware, I have not wilfully ignored a possible mitigating factor. Whether you choose to believe me is entirely up to you. Finally, you will gather that I am not fully invested here at present. So I am hoping for the best possible re-entry price. I may or may not get one much below where we are now. I don't have a particular price in mind either, but it is likely to be when I judge that the scope for further downside moves are limited. | forwood | |
26/10/2021 17:04 | Already done Michaelsadvfn, left my coat at home though 👍. | probabilityofsuccess | |
26/10/2021 16:54 | michaelsadvfn unlike forwood who is on this forum all day and everyday, WE dropped in at market close and read the rubbish the likes of you and forwood have been posting today ! After reading the postings WE think it's you and not US that need to go out for a VERY long walk and take forwood with you while you are at it... :-) | nigoil | |
26/10/2021 16:49 | Well said Sir.. :-) | chris0805 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions