We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jadestone Energy Plc | LSE:JSE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BLR71299 | ORD GBP0.001 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.25 | 4.95% | 26.50 | 26.00 | 27.00 | 27.25 | 24.90 | 25.00 | 2,264,247 | 14:31:17 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 323.28M | -91.27M | -0.1688 | -1.58 | 136.56M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
17/1/2024 08:48 | Unreal share price - fingers crossed for a bid to come. Even 55-60p will do.... JSE Share Price: 27.00p Brent: $77.00 JSE Current Share Price vs 52 Week low of 21p on 18 Aug 23: 28.57% JSE Current Share Price vs 52 Week High of 93.2p on 8 Mar 23: -71.03% Shares Outstanding: 540,693,017 GBPUSD: 1.2650 Jadestone 2024 Production Mid-Guidance (20,000-23,000 Boe/d): 21,500 Current Production -> Past 4 week average (As per 15 Jan 2024 RNS): 20,000 Jadestone Production Average for 2023 (Including Montara Shut-Down): 13,800 Production Average for 2022: 11,487 Debt (USD) (USD 200 Million Reserves Based Lending (RBL) Draw) as of 31 Dec 2023: $157,000,000 Cash (USD) 31 Dec 2023: $152,000,000 Net Debt (USD) 31 Dec 2023 : -$5,000,000 Available Credit (Remaining USD 200Million RBL Available + USD 35Million Standby Facility): $78,000,000 Market Cap (GBP); £145,987,115 Market Cap (USD): $184,673,700 ENTERPRISE VALUE (Market Cap + Debt - Cash) (USD): $189,673,700 EV/Barrel(USD) 2024 Mid Guidance Production 21,500 Boe/d $8,822 EV/Barrel(USD) -> Current Production -> Past 4 week average (As per 15 Jan 2024 RNS): $9,484 EV/Barrel(USD) Jadestone Production Average for 2023 (Including Montara Shut-Down): $13,744 JSE Decommissioning Expense Liability i.e. Asset Restoration Liability per HY 2023 Results: $574,656,000 EV/Barrel (USD) JSE 2024 23,000 Boe/d Production [Added Decommissioning Expense Per HY 2023 Results to Enterprise Value]: $33,232 EV/Barrel (USD) JSE YEAR END 2024 26,000 Boe/d Production [Added Decommissioning Expense Per HY 2023 Results to Enterprise Value]: $29,397 2P Reserves (Boe) as of 31 December 2022: 64,800,000 EV/2P: $2.93 Bloomberg Analyst Summary -> JSE Target Price (Avg of all 5 Analysts Reviewing JSE per BBG) as of 16 Jan 2024: 71.50p % Upside to 12 Month Analyst Target Price: 164.81% | ashkv | |
17/1/2024 08:40 | The days of 100p seem a long time ago now... | winnet | |
17/1/2024 08:35 | baby out with the bathwater as usual Nigel | sea7 | |
17/1/2024 08:35 | Dunno I agree with you Nigel, I'm not laughing... | winnet | |
17/1/2024 08:28 | It makes no sense. UK inflation has absolutely no bearing on JSE - funny to watch but stupid. | nigelpm | |
17/1/2024 08:23 | Heading for previous lows. Surreal | banksy | |
16/1/2024 21:49 | Ahh, missed the abandonment payment & didn't fancy criss-crossing reports for g&a, tax durastictions etc. So, carbon taxes were assessed, it seems earnings should be negative to the tune of maybe 20M$, plus taxes.I think they should insure & have a fire or something at stag but hey ho.https://www.jades | t_headder | |
16/1/2024 20:57 | If you include the $77m abandonment payment and $30m carbon taxes mentioned in the guidance then you're down to zero.Take into account the $40m+ G&A not mentioned in the guidance and you're negative.That's what's not to like.. | bradvert | |
16/1/2024 19:45 | Or Livermore come to that.. ?https://twitter.com | bradvert | |
16/1/2024 19:38 | Bit of a rough calc, I got around 500m$ revenue forecast for 2024 using 75$ bwent (50% hedged) plus 6 months of akatara. So assuming 100m$ is left after guidance costs, what's not to like? | t_headder | |
16/1/2024 19:12 | I do wonder what Tyrus are thinking...... -- Possibly the same as me!! | winnet | |
16/1/2024 18:07 | Hopefully that they can find a buyer north of 65p for JSE :) Would make sense for Enquest, Serica, Neptune etc yasX16 Jan '24 - 17:46 - 20683 of 20685 0 3 0 I do wonder what Tyrus are thinking...... | ashkv | |
16/1/2024 18:07 | Thanks all. Bit of an emotional outburst earlier due to market frustrations (not just JSE!). I need to take a proper look at the presentation later. I feel this has to be near capitulation price atm.. | king suarez | |
16/1/2024 17:58 | rimau1 VLE does seem insanely cheap. MT/others any insight as to why VLE is so cheap? Any factors or even more severe mispricing as compared to JSE's plight? So much value in the sector... And to think TLW, highly leveraged with assets in banana republics and tax claims in arbitration has an EV/Barrel including Decom around US$ 50,000 per boe at a share price of 33p. ITH in super high tax UK has an EV/Barrel including Decom of US$60,000 per boe at a share price of 142p... Relative pricing doesn't appear consistent even accounting for variables.... | ashkv | |
16/1/2024 17:58 | Baillie Gifford sold no shares last month, their holding remains at 7.2%. | pughman | |
16/1/2024 17:46 | I do wonder what Tyrus are thinking...... | yasx | |
16/1/2024 17:39 | IMO as another regional SE Asia producer VLE on a broadly similar marketcap and production profile to JSE is much cheaper with net cash of $150m and a $220m market cap and far less operational risk. VLE today is where i thought JSE would be 12 months ago. | rimau1 | |
16/1/2024 17:33 | Per my calcs 66% of the 2024 lower Opex figure can be attributed to the oil assets CWLH (including 2nd CWLH acquisition) 4,200-5,000 boe/d and Penmal 5,000-7,000 boe/d. Akatara 6,000 boe/d in regular production only from late Q2 2024 per guidance, Sphorm 1,100 - 1,500 boe/d.. Given CWLH recent acquisition is forecast to pay off its close to US$100mn abandonment costs in 2024 - one can estimate how much the prior acquired similar CWLH ownership stake is forecast to generate in profit... Moreover, Penmal assets infil drilling success (Current production 7,000 boe/d 100% to JSE) has been a very welcome dose of good news for JSE.... That appears to be entirely overlooked by the market :( As MT conveyed - spike in Opex for Stag and Montara in 2024 to set right the mismanagement of the early years of JSE operatorship. Reassuring that production should continue if any Montara tank issues come to fore given a dedicated shuttle anchored to Montara.... | ashkv | |
16/1/2024 16:49 | Cheers Ash- The shares I bought in the mid 20's were after montara shut in for the 2nd time with a view it wasn't a serious problem, but they were only a top up unfortunately bringing my average down. imagine simply entering at 25p MT- Thanks for the insight, that is a good sign also with DNV. they have opex $33.5/boe I think, again averaging down by mixing the akatara gas opex in with their oil assets. It's a bit misleading, as the revenue weighting isn't even. King Suarez- Yes it's annoying, slide 7 is almost laughable in the presentation. Like I said above it's misleading when the revenue value of comparable gas boe and oil boe are so different. They would maybe argue that profits per boe are closer but it makes working revenue/profit out a bit confusing. If someone used slide 7 alone to work out financials how out would they be? | 1ajm | |
16/1/2024 16:49 | KS, Actually they did. The non Stag/Montara assets will have an opex of around $12 per barrel this year.This was helpfully provided on page 7 of yesterday's presentation. | bradvert | |
16/1/2024 16:46 | Yes KS I follow your points exactly and was concerned regarding obfuscation as well, because we also held other companies where at best that has happened (!) and whereas the experience profile significantly greater here, I have lost trust in the CFO and become paranoid that the full management team could be becoming similar to "elsewhere" as well! Hopefully very wrong as there is very good diversification to fall back on whilst the weaker assets become irrelevant. IMHO. | dunderheed | |
16/1/2024 16:07 | I feel that JSE quoting an opex/boe is farily meaningless as we are mixing oil, gas and NGLs - the lower opex/boe of the gas developments skew the metric downwards. JSE management can say, "Look y-on-y we've lowered OPEX per barrel aren't we efficient?" er no, your costs have gone up for the assets you have been managing, you've just acquired some lower cost and lower revenue/boe gas assets to dilute the opex/boe and offset this! The reality is that Stag and Montara profitability has been revised downwards due to far higher costs (c$60/bbl?!) and we don't have a separate, clearly indentifiable, opex and revenue/boe metric for the 'non-Montara/Stag' assets to work out their respective profitability - at least not without some work to manually calculate (converting gas price/mmcf into boe etc). Whether deliberate obfuscation or otherwise, it is annoying making things harder than neccessary to evaluate true value - anyone else feel the same? | king suarez | |
16/1/2024 15:12 | 1AJM - 'Do you believe JSE have changed their mindset on how they are going to operate and maintain their assets?' With reference to the Montara Venture FPSO, this has been forced on them - Australian regulator NOPSEMA instructed Jadestone to appoint a high quality Classification Society surveyor to oversee the inspection and maintenance regime and, to assist JSE's onboard team to develop the future standard required to ensure the FPSO can be safely and efficiently operated through to the end of its commercial life. That Jadestone appointed a DNV surveyor to carry out this role speaks highly as to their determination to put in place a much better inspection and maintenance regime - as DNV are one of the world's leading Classification Societies, and used by many of the leading shipping companies, as a result of their very strict interpretation of the rules and the high standards of compliance they expect from the ship owners who appoint them. If you charter a ship that has the likes of DNV or Lloyd's Register as the Classification Society, you can rest assured it will have been inspected and maintained to a very high standard - such ships invariably command a premium charter rate. The likes of Shell and BP only charter ships with such provenance. By 2025, Montara's current $60 opex/bbl should experience a step change drop, since the circa $6 opex/bbl shuttle tanker charter cost will fall away, as will most of the hefty FPSO inspection and maintenance costs incurred in 2024 to bring the remaining sea water ballast and cargo tanks back into an operational condition. AIMHO/DYOR Edit: Valeura Energy has given opex/bbl guidance for 2024 of $26. JSE's opex/bbl at $33.5 mid point is fairly reasonable by comparison considering it includes elevated contributions from Montara and Stag. | mount teide |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions