We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.10 | 9.70 | 10.50 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.83 | 93.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/3/2019 17:17 | I did read it... your message said " TOSH ... IN your opinion "... so how is that directed at Berm ? As to whether i am buying or selling or staying put, its got absolutely nothing to do with you. What ive said is that im very happy with my current position, the risk / reward profile is very much as it should be.... I'm not sitting on any losses so I have my tickets, now i just wait for the draw. | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 17:10 | End of the year ... because even if the SCIB1 program starts it has a feed in time safety wise, as we know the bulk of the costs will really kick off next year as the tracking of shrinkage is expensive Modi1 again not till end of year as per your posts ... clearly this is all down to trial design ... and is subjective till the IND is approved. Modi2 manufacture may be a catalyst to seek funding ... | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 17:03 | Inanaco, You say that it's too early to consider funding which implies that you have an opinion as to when funding will be required - as per my 20263, when do you think funding will be needed based on what we know today? | bermudashorts | |
05/3/2019 17:03 | Tosh please read what is written it was a reply to Bermuda ... would "he" sell ... i can expand that to YOU So would you sell ? or are you holding for a deal ... tosh ? so rather that You posting as being the "market" ... why don't you post what would YOU do | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 16:56 | No... not my opinion, the market has been selling... FACT | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 16:51 | TOSH ... IN your opinion | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 16:41 | Lots of people have been selling at these levels, hence the share price decline, so thats not a relevant question, its already been answered by the market... we're talking about the fact that money needs to come from somewhere, and quickly. | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 16:39 | To early to consider, i have posted as such without the details of the Biontech collaboration being announced you could be posting for days the various options and still be caught out by CRUK funding Modi1 question is would you sell at this level ? as that really is the fundamental question | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 16:25 | P S - Just to remind folks Funding Thread... NOT all are welcome ...ONLY intelligent folks are | the real lozan | |
05/3/2019 16:23 | What's your take then Inan? When will funding be required and what is the likely source? | bermudashorts | |
05/3/2019 16:23 | Tosh - I agree, although, I would add = Someone HAS to put in place "a big fluffy bunny rabbit into the top hat.. for it 'to be ABLE to jump out and surprise us'. The last OO was under-subscribed It is hard to see IIs would be 'happy' to be 'tapped-up' again, especially in the 'same old terms/ way'... Something HAS to change. Which is why I believe the next few weeks - March might prove 'pivotal' It is also 'hard to believe' the BoD are not aware of the REAL situation. The present 'situation' cannot continue indefinately Which is why I believe the next few weeks - March - April at the latest, might prove 'pivotal' / REVEALING. | the real lozan | |
05/3/2019 16:21 | Just remind folks Funding Thread all welcome | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:59 | Loz, IMHO funding will be required before Mid Summer ( probably sooner ). I genuinely hope that there is a big fluffy bunny rabbit hiding in a top hat somewhere, just waiting to jump out and surprise us. The fact of the matter is, if we can identify that cash will be needed soon, the BOD will be even more aware of it. I struggle to believe that they have not got some kind of action plan in place, other than just another cash call. I doubt that the II's will be too impressed being asked to throw more money at Scancell, especially with the share price performance over the last 5 years. Any fund manager has to justify his investments ( as well as getting paid on the back of them ), and to be honest, i think they will have struggled to do so over the last few years, so to now invest even more of your clients money, would take a lot of justification. With all of that in mind, as well as the fact that the last placing was actually under subscribed ( contrary to some peoples views ), i honestly cant see another discounted raise being an option, there has to be something else, especially as the BOD have done nothing to protect the current share price There must be something in the background... there has to be. | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 15:39 | The point is = FUNDING is 'On the CARDS' - I see more and more folks are coming-round to 'my reasoned way of thinking', that the question of FUNDING may need to be resolved sooner rather than later. Certainly, T'would appear more than a few 'dismiss' the CLAIMS that FUNDING does not need to be addressed for 12 to 18 months. Is it WISE to speak in terms of "having enough cash to START trials" Reasoned folks would think it UNWISE not to have FUNDS in place to COMPLETE trials - BEFORE any trials were even started. AND Keep the 'lights on' for the duration of said trials. . Never mind the time required for results of said trials to be analysed. . However,as *WE ALL* know, some people / trHYPERS and WISDOM = are strangers. | the real lozan | |
05/3/2019 15:31 | Loz, i think it was the chart that scared him off... knowing that he's lost a fortune is bad enough, but seeing it on a graph that looks like a childrens slide must be even more painful. | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 15:26 | i will leave you discussing "funding" Lozans Thread ... | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:25 | YOU still here ??? Why ??? NO ONE is interested in YOUR LOW ESTEEMED ranting | the real lozan | |
05/3/2019 15:22 | Today .. hysteria Tosh not sure of himself Gazza suggest CFD should be off the table Bermuda changes subject to SCIB2 .. I join in ... tosh takes it back to CFD Lozan clutters with Funding .. again PMSL... | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:18 | don't have to Tosh ... your winding yourself up ... you agreed with me now You don't ... which post should i research ... the one that agreed with me .. or the latest one that tries to overturn that ? | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:18 | I see more and more folks are coming-round to 'my reasoned way of thinking', that the question of FUNDING may need to be resolved sooner rather than later. Certainly, T'would appear more than a few 'dismiss' the CLAIMS that FUNDING does not need to be addressed for 12 to 18 months. | the real lozan | |
05/3/2019 15:16 | dear oh dear.... still you dont understand... please just go back and read my posts, the answers to your stupid questions are all there. And you did confuse it with spread betting and you absolutely did not explain what a CFD was, otherwise you would not still be asking silly questions...now please go away. Just go back to your own BB, your poison is not wanted here. Now im going to let the poison ferment in its own humble juice.. Proven WRONG yet again. He must get so bored of it... i hope. | tosh123 | |
05/3/2019 15:14 | one way you could find out .... search for a deal between CRUK and the delivery system CRUK don't have to announce, but the delivery system may be from a PLC | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:11 | I agree with you Bermuda ... SCIB2 .. could be very interesting, but as we have assigned it, we may have to wait for the transparency of the trial itself | inanaco | |
05/3/2019 15:03 | well again i go back to my original post ... no mention of confusion on it regarding spread betting i even explained what CFD stood for and Today you agreed i was correct ... then changed your mind .!!! inanaco5 Mar '19 - 14:47 - 20242 of 20245 Edit 0 0 0 found the original first reply to Researcher1 on the LSE SCLPRE: sp6 Feb '19 CFD don't show up at all !! its a "" contract for difference """ not a contract to buy a share on your behalf | inanaco |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions