Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh123] 06/3/2019 15:44

ONW,
I agree... leave him to his insane rants, he's genuinely pathetic.
Nothing he has to say is relevant anyway, all he does is lie and get everything wrong , so his nonsense is far better suited to the other place.

He cant answer any of the questions posed either so whats the point of engaging him.

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:44

My strategy

dig very deep into understanding the science so that i can mitigate or even eliminate areas of concern as predicted by others ...

Tosh has Mouse concern
Myself !! .. No concern, as i actually read the results which do transfer from the mouse to human


so If that data is correct ... and Bermuda i feel would agree with me ...

the odds of synergy between SCIB1 and PD-1 transferred from the mouse into human is extremely high if only we had the IChor FDA approval

so if that is the case ...............

SCIB1 ......... plus keytruda with its proven sales in this area must be

1/ commercial
2/very valuable

3 should command a deal

in which case its all about the number you hold .....

which is what A "core holding means"

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 15:38

Interesting to watch the fervour of Inanaco's posts since seeing there's no more to be said.
Four in a row... ONE AFTER THE OTHER....
On and on and on .....
Talk about hoist with his own petard... LOL
I'd suggest we leave him to it :-)
ATB

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:32

or let's look at it another way

after exhaustive Guess work .. ONW and Tosh predicted a share movement down

but despite that. they felt "holding for a deal" was a better bet ....

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:29

anyway


Tosh Holding shares for a deal
ONW holding shares for a deal

game over

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:28

Tosh

ONW has advised you to give up on it as your are on thin ice .....

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:27

ONW

on the contrary ..

your core Holding ? .. puts you into the same camp ..

thin ice ?

LOL

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 15:26

Tosh, I see there's more attempts to muddy the waters now. So damned predictable.
Pointless posting further on that one I'd say.
LOL
ATB

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:23

Tosh ...

why are you so convinced i am sitting on enormous losses ?


and really you should think a bit harder about the mouse data on SCIB1 ..

perhaps bermuda can explain the importance of the original SCIB1 data in the mouse being proved to translate into human

and the effects on the reliability of replicating that by adding a murine PD-1 which has also proved reliable in transferring to human data

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 15:23

Thanks Bermuda, lets hope so, but the run's on for CF now... not ideal.
ATB

[tosh123] 06/3/2019 15:21

Berm,
everyone wants to see an orderly unwind of their positions, so hopefully there will be an exit plan that doesn't hurt the markets too much.

ineptico.... please try to stay on topic and stop lying.

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 15:21

Inanaco
No, you don't get away with that.
The point under discussion was your ability to predict against YOUR IMPOSED 50/50 chance for Tosh.
The question of the Deal is (as Bermuda also points out) an irrelevancy dragged in by you to muddy the waters.
Your Predictions of the share price have been Completely Incorrect whereas Tosh has demonstrated an ability to predict which is vastly superior to yours and beats not only your completely failed efforts but also the 50/50 rule you imposed on him.
Sorry Inanaco but you've failed even the test you set for someone else, so please stop banging on about waiting for a deal.
IN that connection incidentally, you may have noticed that for many the illusive deal has moved from almost a dead cert to a good chance (Rabbits in hats etc).
Be careful Inanaco, the ice upon which you attempt to base your fallacious argument is getting thinner bwith each post you make.
AIMO
ATB

[tosh123] 06/3/2019 15:18

On the contrary, its of great interest to those who dont want to be sitting on massive losses like you.
As for losing the mouse debate, you cant say that... no one can... the trials haven't even started yet, and im not saying that it WILL fail, im saying that until it is proven, it could fail... again another LIE... Honestly, what is the matter with you.

[bermudashorts] 06/3/2019 15:16

Following our discussions at the weekend re. City Financial and orderly markets (see my 20096), it looks like City Financial have suspended dealing on the Absolute Equity Fund due to a run of client redemptions. So no more sells for the time being.

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:11

ONW ...

"Yes, I hold a core holding BUT I can now (if I wish reinvest from past profits) at a level which is far better than you probably average ""


yes you have a core holding ... so i assume you are waiting a deal .. ?

LOL

the rest of the details relate to your personal preference of how you got there ..

which really is of no interest

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 15:04

Tosh ..

you are correct ...

however the Mouse SCIB1 data did translate to Huaman

you cannot now say that it did not ... or it might not

which is why you lost that one

[tosh123] 06/3/2019 14:59

Ive not ignored the mouse data ! Yet more lies, and once again you make stuff up to try and suit your agenda.... What is wrong with you ?
What i have said quite clearly is that mouse data DOES NOT always directly transfer to the same data / results in human trials... FACT... that is not ignoring it, it is the complete opposite, its acknowledging it.... Now stop lying.

and try to stay on topic.
Funding required, very soon ( not tomorrow )... unless the fluffy white bunny appears.

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 14:54

Inanaco
ACTUALLY,No you're not correct.
Tosh is predicting (Or hoping for) a deal, but I don't believe He or I have ever said anything different.
Where he and I differ from you is simple.
We have stated that the share price does not go in a straight line and other more short term issues can get in the way.
YOU however have always spouted the MANTRA that the share price doesn't matter...
Well to those who want to preserve their capital it does, consequently many have departed from your philsophy (when it suits that is) of buying... All in becausre there's no risk etc. and holding.
There IS a risk, and that is that things don't go to plan.
Those who have decided that maybe things won't go to plan (and there's plenty of signals to suggest that over the years) and have taken some profits are now in a better overall position (and have been proved to be correct (against a 50/50 chance according to you).
Yes, I hold a core holding BUT I can now (if I wish reinvest from past profits) at a level which is far better than you probably average, and still end up with as great(if not greater) holding than you, with the proportionate end of game profit.
However you look at it (and I've incorporated you distraction of "waiting for a deal" ) since we were discussing PREDICTIONS, yours are 100% WRONG and Tosh's are 100% CORRECT against a 50/50 chance (according to you).
I don't think your record's particularly good in that context, Do you?
AIMO
ATB

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 14:36

ONW you are holding for a deal ... is that correct ?

Tosh is holding for a deal
""Yep... of course im holding for the possibility of a deal, ive never said anything different,SO IS EVERYONE you idiot """"

Proven

I am predicting the value to the share of deals

how can i be wrong and tosh be right ...

when we are both Holding for deals .....which we accept will be high if the data from the mouse (ignored by tosh) is proved correct

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 14:33

BTW Inanaco,
I KNOW Why you've failed to be correct over 7YEARS, but before explaining that I can't wait to see your defence...
ATB

[oldnotwise] 06/3/2019 14:30

Inanaco
I've just read a very interesting statement from you.
You've said that,

"when people like Tosh predict a movement down ..

what they are not doing is predicting why it will move down ...

Indeed Tosh has just posted as such .. "history"

it's just pure guesswork as he has a 50/50 chance of being Right"

So, Inanaco, If guesswork has a 50/50 chance of being right, it seems to me that your own particular "Predictions" for the share price since 2012 have always been for the share price to be higher than it was at the time of your posting those "Predictions".

Thus Tosh is 100% right (against your comment) of only a 50/50 chance, whilst you're 100% wrong against the same measure.

So if as you say a prediction from Tosh suggests a movement down even if I give YOU the benefit of the doubt how can it be that if you've been calling the share price higher ever since the infamous 64p peak in Scancell's price in 2012 how on earth can Tosh be 100% correct (Since we're almost at an all time low), yet You're 100% INCORRECT?
However you look at it you must comcede that Tosh must have something to be so diametrically right against your complete failure to correctly predict the share pruce over a seven year period.
How do you explain Tosh's SUCCESS against your FAILURE over such a long period (seven years)?
I'm amazed that you've failed so dismally to be correct in your predictions.
Seems you owe Tosh a large apology.
AIMO
ATB

[inanaco] 06/3/2019 14:29

you have a different strategy of holding for a deal ...



so why have you not got that right ?

[tosh123] 06/3/2019 14:28

ineptico.... " i would say it's simple myself ... we moved to 6p because of a 5m share movement ".

But it had already hit the 6p mark once BEFORE the City revelation and BEFORE the 5 mill... It went into the 6p territory over a month ago, so once again, your theory is fundamentally flawed.