Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[bermudashorts] 05/3/2019 15:03

Gazza/anyone,

any thoughts on SCIB2? Now over 14 months since announcement was made - would be great to hear that delivery method sorted and manufacture at least started together with anticipated timescales for trial. Commencement of the SCIB2 trial is actually a bigger deal IMO than the IND given the scale back in patient nos. for SCIB1. From memory the SCIB2 trial is around 75 patients - and randomised!!!!!!

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 15:00

just go away... you have had everything explained to you many times now, even the FACT that a CFD is not necessarily a leveraged position, and the science behind that, if you cant take in basic information, you're snookered, now please just go back and read all of the posts, all the answers to your questions are there in black and white.
Not stressed, just feel sorry for you as your ability to grasp FACTS is lacking by an alarming amount.
Now stop wasting peoples time, just go back and read, everything you need to know is there for you.
NEXT

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:52

Gazza getting stressed ...

Chill man .. Tosh thinks he is right and wrong ...

as he agreed with me then didn't ...

I hold my hands up...

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:49

SCLPRE: inanaco6 Feb '19
researcher 1 ...... by the way you have not purchased the full contract as its a leveraged position which indicates you are gambling from a small capital base

best of luck with that one

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:49

Gazza,
apologies.... its the poison again.

We need to get rid of the idiot.

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:47

found the original first reply to Researcher1 on the LSE

SCLPRE: sp6 Feb '19
CFD don't show up at all !! its a "" contract for difference """ not a contract to buy a share on your behalf

hope that answers your question

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:47

On the contrary.... you are agreeing with me, because thats what i said... it was you that denied that a CFD trade would appear on the book.
Go back and read your posts and you will see that YOU are now agreeing with me.

What an oaf.

NEXT

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:45

Oh no it wasn't.... your statement to researcher1 was that CFD trades would never be shown on the order book, because they were like spread bets .... THAT WAS YOUR STATEMENT.... So i educated you because YOU WERE WRONG.

Go on, go back and look at your posts.... you tried to ridicule Researcher and failed miserably, because the hedge to some CFD trades will most certainly appear on the blotter... simple as that.

I even gave you the reasons why that would happen, which confused you even more haha.

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:43

I dont need to ...

you have already agreed with me once today ...

you appear to be in conflict with your own post

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:41

It was YOU that confused CFD's with spread betting.
I merely educated you to the reality... it appears though, that any information provided has since been wiped from your memory banks... but like i have said many times before, you cant put 2 pints into a 1 pint pot.... or in your case, a thimble.

Just go back and read your posts.... you were totally confused and WRONG ( for a change ).

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:37

the question was ...

How do you know which trade on the exchange originated from a CFD

you cannot tell ...

so like i said to researcher1 ... how do you know ?

and i kept asking you "provide the evidence"

... and you get all Huff and Puff again

let's face it your post today agrees with mine ....so get real

and you cannot prove CFD to Trade link ...

impossible

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:33

for clarity... a single "trade" ( CFD's are NOT options, as i have told you many times before )could very well be the only trade on the brokers book, especially when volumes are thin, hence a single trade = a brokers net position... its really not rocket science provided you have an intellect superior to a grass snake.

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:32

Tosh nobody is supporting you

you shot yourself in the foot by agreeing with me

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:30

The answers are all there for you... you just need to grow an IQ of more than 2 to be able to read and understand... unfortunately nature has seen fit to deal you a short hand and deprive you of sufficient grey matter, something that, on this occasion, i cant help you with.

My posts are absolutely consistent, unlike yours, which dance around trying to cover your lack of knowledge and the fact that you WERE WRONG.

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:26

Gazza,
its an attempt at a power thing.
He thinks just because he has a few hundred thousand shares , that it makes him important.
Of course the reality is that his few hundred thousand shares are firstly, vastly more expensive than anyone else's, and secondly im absolutely certain 100% , that there are other people on here that hold more shares than he does.

He is obsessed with himself... His posts to Researcher1 yesterday reinforce the content of your post re him being more interested in other peoples holdings than his own, and that is that. Its all there in black and white... as are his posts about not understanding CFD's.

NEXT

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:25

you have provided no facts

what i have said

I will repeat the post



and just to remind you ......


inanaco - 06 Feb 2019 - 14:38:15 - 19455 of 19483 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP
No ...

Tosh is talking about hedging the difference between all the CFD options on the table


Researcher 1 ... is talking about a single option on the table

Huge difference

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:23

Tosh ...

you already explained in your post today my mistake .. ?

are you now saying your post today was wrong ?

FFS man make your mind up ...

[tosh123] 05/3/2019 14:19

On the contrary.... If you read back through YOUR posts, you started off by denying that any hedging took place, mainly because you were totally confused about the difference between a spread bet and a CFD.... you got it ALL WRONG.

You were trying to say that positions were taken naked by the providers. It wasn't until i pointed out that there were fundamental differences between spread bets and CFD's in that the exposure is totally different, that you then changed tack.

I said ALL THE WAY THROUGH that any broker will only hedge his net position via the physical, i know, i used to do it !

You just slithered and squirmed away from your original position, desperately trying to change your mind without anyone noticing, but yet again, the idiot has to eat humble pie.
YOU WERE WRONG.... just go back and read your posts.

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:05

never asked you how many you hold .. ? Bermuda has never been asked,

only Lozan

wonder why ?

[gazza] 05/3/2019 14:04

Inan,

Why are you so obsessed with other peoples trades/investments/shorts?

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 14:03

yea ...A hammer blow to Tosh credentials ...

has Tosh crawled under a Rock ?

oh Dear !

decapitated by a mouse post ..

and now his CFD journey has ended in a car crash

i won't make an issue of it ...

as at least he is holding for a "Deal"

........

next

[the real lozan] 05/3/2019 13:59

In case *WE ALL* needed to be reminded -
It was made clear yesterday by the vast majority of posts / posters, that inane'n'co, is held, by the vast majority here...In such LOW ESTEEM.
Today, HE endeavours to show *US ALL*...Why that is so.

[inanaco] 05/3/2019 13:32

just to remind you of Toshs post

tosh1235 Mar '19 - 13:10 - 20218 of 20221
0 0 0
only any " net " positions are hedged in the market... You've been told this a million times, which is why the orders are sometimes shown on the tape, and other times they aren't, it all comes down to a brokers NET position, yet you still cant grasp it... oh well, you cant put 2 pints into a 1 pint pot.

Anyway, back in the real world.

posted on the 5th march by me ...................

""""""when most business that trades in CFD uses a Balanced system

ie sells try to match buys while the hedging the difference """""


anybody spot the difference ... ?

well there is none .. !!

tosh just does not read what is written ................

proven