User Notice: The old Support number is no longer in use. To reach Support please call +44 (0) 203 8794 460

Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.10 -1.22% 8.10 47,660 09:59:41
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
8.00 8.20 8.20 8.10 8.20
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology -4.94 -1.34 38.0
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
10:01:17 O 5,143 8.01 GBX

Scancell (SCLP) Latest News

More Scancell News
Scancell Takeover Rumours

Scancell (SCLP) Share Charts

1 Year Scancell Chart

1 Year Scancell Chart

1 Month Scancell Chart

1 Month Scancell Chart

Intraday Scancell Chart

Intraday Scancell Chart

Scancell (SCLP) Discussions and Chat

Scancell Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
16/7/201910:44Using immunology to fight cancer.23,117
13/6/201918:12Could this be the end of cancer?771
20/5/201817:25Scancell short thread2
16/8/201408:47Using immunology to fight cancer (LTH W/O Rose Tints - Free Speech Thread)161

Add a New Thread

Scancell (SCLP) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Scancell trades in real-time

Scancell (SCLP) Top Chat Posts

Scancell Daily Update: Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 8.20p.
Scancell Holdings Plc has a 4 week average price of 6.25p and a 12 week average price of 3.65p.
The 1 year high share price is 13.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 3.65p.
There are currently 465,355,867 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 717,373 shares. The market capitalisation of Scancell Holdings Plc is £37,693,825.23.
tosh123: ineptico..... "you have not traded .. that is the point" .... what an absolutely stupid and ludicrous statement... are you really that dense ? How do you think anyone manages to create a free ride ???? You really are a plank. Honestly, every time you post, you just make yourself look more and more stupid ! and then... another pearl of wisdom.... " I just hold for deal ... share price not relevant" Of course the share price is relevant you blithering idiot ! Just how stupid are you ! If your average is 30p and a deal gets done at 5 times today's share price, ( 32p ) which many would take, by the time you've paid costs, you'll be making a penny at best .... you really are very very stupid aren't you. The more you post, the more you show just how little you know about anything... scarily so.
panama7: TF, you state " BUT you don't know what's coming re funding ". Yes we do the share price tells you whats coming and it ain't a deal with Biontech and it ain't a Fundraising at a premium. Holloway is very reliant on getting the share price back to 12p he has stated that on a couple of occasions. Draw your own conclusions IF and it's a big IF the share price gets back to 12p there will be a fundraising at 10p.
panama7: TF, simple question . If the share price is 34p and the CEO states categorically that the Company's future is very short and will be sold for many multiples of the share price and seven years later with the vast majority of II's and PI's sitting on losses and the share price at an all time low should a Company that is working in the field of Cancer that should be a beacon of integrity and honesty still have a position on the BOD for that individual ?
tosh123: Reality = a share price dicing with 4p, plus, every likelihood of another cash raise within the next couple of months, that will drive the share price even lower. versus Clown land = No further funding needed, share price to be £8 any time now. Who in their right mind cant see this ?
inanaco: tosh123 - 02 May 2016 - 14:05:41 - 5333 of 20421 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP Thats nice and easy to sort out... My average is way under the current SP, WHAT IS YOURS ? Is it under the current share price ? nice simple question that will put this one to bed once and for all. And you seem to have overlooked the part of my post about W's bet, once again... surely you need to take him up on his wager after all your posts, because surely you need to prove that you were right, otherwise you'll just continue to look like a muppet. share price 15p .... """ My average is way under the current share price """" so that is one post that you admit .... now considering you are holding for a deal and the share price has hardly moved up from that figure but moved down, and indeed you Did NOT buy in around the 10p lows you told us you would NOT . so who is lying here ... Freebies with an Average or Tosh runs on free shares tosh123 - 28 Apr 2016 - 09:08:56 - 5266 of 20421 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP for the millionth time... i am comfortable as my average is very low ( way under the current share price ) despite a purchase at circa 23p and another at circa 13p, its really not rocket science ! As for declaring my trades, this will never happen you idiot ! I have nothing to prove to you, and the fact that you keep demanding such a stupid thing , only goes to reinforce your arrogance, and total lack of understanding of how things work. Only those with huge ego's feel the need to advertise their holdings and trading activities. Tosh you are just waffle ......... "i am comfortable with my average"
gazza: Inan, you said: "Currency movements which are actually inverse to the stock market £/$ pair" OK, let's work this out. If you are talking about SCLP share price then.. Has gone from 60p to 6p Inverse would be 6p to 60p (x 10 up) £/E was 1.00/1.20 so applying your inverse stock price principle 1 GBP would now be 12 EUR. If that were the case, I'd have bought the house next door to Loz and would now be sharing a 1664 whilst discussing the grass length.
tosh123: Somewhat ironic that the caped crusader ridicules the holders of VAL by saying that he warned them of the share price collapse , when HE himself was warned by many of us that the SCLP share price was going to crash, but still bought more at 45p. The idiot is pointing a finger at people who have done EXACTLY the same as he is guilty of... What a plank.
knowlesi: The share price here has been hammered so hard, the trend is so strong which tells you there are a lot of investors who have given up over the last 5/6 years. The company has failed to progress at a pace that shareholders expected (whether that's shareholder expectation or the company that miscalculated is up for debate) - given the AGM comments I struggle to see anything really changing over the next 12 months re meaningful re-rate news. I don't think your average AIM investor is looking at the market cap and comparing our platform with others and saying there is a disconnect re relative values, rather they are seeing delays, a long risky road ahead and saying no thanks. This is why the share price could half again, in fact probably down is more likely on no news. Owning scancell feels a bit like being an option buyer - every day there is time decay which pulls the value of the option closer to zero - it's like everyday there is no news, more sellers. Probably not surprising considering the large retail holder base here, I have long been critical of the bod for not being more active in increasing their II ownership, which is generally smart money and in theory longer term capital. Your average retail guy doesn't want his money in a risky 5 year play. The bod seemed very clear at the AGM - and I actually agree with them, focusing on the share price is just a distraction for them and they should concentrate on getting IP into clinical trials and managing the business (we really can't have any more delays). Given this and the comments from JC - they see value coming from data and that's 18-24 months away - this therefore presents a you with a timeframe and it's by and large binary on success of clinical trails. Either investors wake up and look at the market cap vs. others and say this is too cheap or Scancell embark on more friendly share holder comms - being more proactive, get out to II's and present and get that institutional anchor base we desparately need - without those two actions (and I think the later is unlikely based on AGM comments) - the downward pressure will persist. Now all this said, I think this is exactly the time to buy - being a contrarian a good indicator of when to buy a stock is when everyone hates it/pessimism is strong. No good news whatsoever is priced in, there are many disgruntled existing holders and ex shareholders nursing losses - holding scancell has been a lesson in the power of sentiment and this seems to override fundamentals in this share (strong retail % ownership) - you can see if from the BB - when there is high fiving and gloating - the share punishes. When there is bickering amongst the bullish regulars - the share price goes on a burn. It's a classic sentiment gauge. Buy when investors hate and sell the stuff that is loved - sentiment become disconnected from the fundamental outlooks in both cases, given that I think it's hard to think of a better time to buy...
drdobson1: ONW-Personally thought what a great post. I have been thinking along same lines re Inanaco.Is he a lot cleverer than I have given him credit for. Create the impression of being a long term holder but all the time is he has been trading SCLP-probably only revealed when his ego could not cope with the beating it was taking from the declining share price and he thought I have to be seen as a much better investor/trader than the ASTUTE. On the VAL board he was called a shorter and that he and C7 were part of a boiler room crew.Well I thought that a load of nonsense but perhaps he is a secret trader as you say that stock is a lot more volatile than here. Good traders are often perceived as being devious and only out for themselves and he certainly fits that bill By portraying himself as a self taught science guru he has sought to distract from his game plan which is to destroy investor sentiment and cause maximum bulletin board disharmony. He probably wants to get the SCLP share price to fall so he can buy and trade in fact he may not have much of a holding at all. He is as cunning as a cartload of monkeys and slippery as an eel and has me totally fooled or am I being too kind t9 him. Anyway all have a happy new year
inanaco: ""if you make a statement that i cannot reason against then your statement becomes the lead policy which i then support "" yes because most of the intense discussion are on the science that impact IP value """There are plenty. Here's just one: share price down from 60p to 12p. Isn't that a negative? I make it negative 48p."""" That's sentiment has the science stood still in all that time, ? ""the Shareprice is not relevant as all i am trying to show is it's cheap relative to the IP.<<br /> Two fatal flaws in one sentence: 1) How on earth can you say the share price isn't relevant??!! It is very relevant if you have invested and need to sell.""" You have now added a third party ie somebody that needs to sell, that is not my position. """It is relevant to how easy it is for SCLP to raise new funds and at what price those funds are raised and therefore relevant to the amount of dilution of our investment.""" Very true, But like you have done, you can then look at the shares in issue and assess the likely outcome of capital growth based on the resultant influx of cash and how the science develops from that Dilution so has a result on both sides of the equation Ie A bigger increase in capital growth than was forecast without that expenditure. """ all i am trying to show is it's cheap relative to the IP.<<br /> Well you haven't! """ I have but maybe you have not understood the years of comparing and understanding of the science of others with wildforce allowed us to pretty well place Scancell into the market place and place reasoned value to the IP """" lozan/Tosh, Mr W cannot explain why the IP has a lower value to the share price <<br /> The IP has a lower value to the SP? Are you saying the IP is not worth 12p? """ actually the buying of the share by Loz at 47p and selling at 53p would indicate Loz buying at the level was cheap and selling at 53p produced a true value event. to then argue its only worth 12p with that evidence would be difficult ... but Loz would have to show comparative value to the IP .. being 12p .. which i suspect would be impossible """not a point worth discussing as No conclusion will be ever drawn from it as its not linked to IP only market sentiment on any particular day ...<<br /> You have a point, why worry about a share price of 12.3 when it could easily be 12.5 tomorrow."" I am not worried about the share price, i already feel the value way exceeds this level, and indeed the Board of Scancell accept that, hence they want to raise the big amounts not based on share price but IP .. however they will always have the fall back position of market priced cash raising which again is Not Ip priced cash raising like a deal """thus all the posts can be dismissed as not relevant, <<br /> In YOUR opinion, which here does not command a very high level of respect"""" then show me posts that you feel are of High Value that i have missed, like i said I debate for my own investment position ..I defend Scancell because I am invested not because your invested,
Scancell share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20190716 10:22:15