Rolls-royce Share Discussion Threads

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 19:39

I was looking at sone modelling for default forecasts into 2024, and it all makes 2008 look small. They can’t help like in covid or it just makes inflation fly in a default crisis and so on

It’s rather messy

I can see shares like RR hitting 10p

It may seem far fetched but not long ago, expecting 70p was too

[wish i wasnt in rbs] 19/6/2023 19:26

Vlad and II are the same person

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:45

Yes I saw SR do the same a while back. A bear on one platform and a bull on another. Exact same post count each day on each. And the bull version was a hero despite the share falling 77%😂

Was a good point he made for what he was doing it for back then

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:42

Agree Vlad. Market doesn’t really give a fk who you are. It will reap anyone it can. And very good at it too it must be said

[vlad the impaler] 19/6/2023 17:41

That’s unless any of us appear

Well, as you know, sheep and all that….

I have seen brain surgeons unwittingly transform into market trolls


Money and Mind does that

[vlad the impaler] 19/6/2023 17:39

But you can’t be hard on them II

BBs are comfort blankets for them.

“Threads of Justification and Intellect Confirmation ”.

Lol

[vlad the impaler] 19/6/2023 17:37

I did 175 posts in five hours for fun. They just all agreed with my great wisdom

It’s hilarious

[vlad the impaler] 19/6/2023 17:36

Practically all thick knuts II. I’m a bull somewhere else for a laugh and they all think I’m great. If only they knew where I was posting all that 😂

Impaler

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:34

The longer y’all just rattle on about II, rather than address risk, the sooner we all realise how dim y’all are and can’t address said

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:31

Be a lot less posts if addressing the questions wasn’t with replies about pikey’s and caravans you know

It doesn’t reflect well upon selves

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:28

Being a technical investor you will probably quote me rsi or stochastic on 6 month chart or stuff like that? Or today and the week etc

Albeit the risks there are the multiple failures of said for RR spanning decades

So fundamental risks

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:24

Y’all mentioned top Investors and their ways to me before, somehow as a vindication even though they don’t hold . Failed to mention their focus on risk of course but that’s ok. It just slipped your minds

We can rectify that discussing it now

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:22

Ok smurfy

No investment is risk free

What risks are attached currently against a breakout occurring? And why have all the buy reasons failed to breakout ?

[smurfy2001] 19/6/2023 17:21

This has got to break out sometime soon. Once it does I'm on the way to 100% profit lovely jubbly.

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:18

Let’s ponder the buys then

No investment is risk free

No doubt you all bought RR 0.1p off its low, knowing BBs

Ok then

Given nothing is risk free, what risks did you guys identify before buying? Why are none of them mentioned here ? And are those risks eradicated today?

II

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:16

This is the problem on BBs

Those calling buy since the high days are ‘well Informed’ and those mentioning risk, have no life

😂

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:15

CREI is a POS btw

Honestly, what you guys be thinking?

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:13

Very odd comments from those trolling advfn and LSE boards for years full time

Perhaps if you guys had something of interest in life, not be here ?

[drew lonmenob] 19/6/2023 17:05

He got sacked driving vans Total loon

[pharmaboy3] 19/6/2023 16:57

11 blocked postings in 5 minutes. You need help.Perhaps a proper day job?

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 16:38

Q1 was wholly artificial

In essence it occurred when the ceo confirmed it’s a dog

Distribution in full swing

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 16:34

Recent poster was right. It ought to be 175….however, if all was true to form

Ask yourselves why it isn’t?

Should do

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 16:33

Which is cute in a way haha