Iofina Share Discussion Threads

[neddo] 12/3/2015 15:42

April? what year?

[freshvoicem] 12/3/2015 11:26

My guess is by 30th April.

[arlington chetwynd talbot] 12/3/2015 11:08

cb5, everyone else? ffs LOL, well done ;)

You about Banksy? Or is it purdah? lol

[superg1] 12/3/2015 09:54

There is a chance that the official decision would be known before an rns. Whether that would be days, weeks or up to 3 months is a lottery.

In standard circs I'd expect a result in 6 to 8 weeks. In the circs of asking for closing briefs, and knowing the evidence situation, I consider the conclusion could be swift.

[superg1] 12/3/2015 09:35

jbe

Not surprised as such as a nomad will only authorise an rns for material news, and it seems for sure the advice is to reduce the amount of news flow.

I was just wondering if they would as the hearing date was not confirmed, but as we know has taken place, both dates of the 19th and 6th have been confirmed by PI's not the company.

Pure speculation but perhaps indications have been given that there will be a quick conclusion, so they will wait for that outcome rather than waste an rns now.

There could be one explaining about the hearing coming tomorrow for all we know.

Guesswork, but we all know the hearing has gone ahead, so it's not news to us.

The 6th March closing brief hasn't been mentioned officially either, but we know it was on the cards.

[roundup] 12/3/2015 09:20

Until we have definitive news an Rns would not be helpful at all.

[jbe81] 12/3/2015 09:11

Superg are you suprised there has been no rns? You mentioned you thought there would be one to clarify the state of play on the water hearing.

[cityboy5] 11/3/2015 16:44

Hope you had your money on Dodging Bullets at Cheltenham today ACT - everyone else did.....

[woodpeckers] 11/3/2015 11:10

Someone has far too much time on their hands when they vote down a post saying thanks!

[superg1] 11/3/2015 09:55

Aha thanks monet.

[monet] 11/3/2015 09:52

SG1
Have a look at ISDX, one 10/03/2015 08:34 57,160 @ 34.9

[jbe81] 11/3/2015 09:51

Interesting rns from ORM today, share price has been performing terribly but last few RNSs paint an interesting picture, multi bag potential in a short period of time.

[superg1] 11/3/2015 09:49

I can't be that cruel I spent a long time looking for the legislation.

For depots as you say all they have to do is stick a sign up saying not for sale for water transfer into ND. What the buyer does with it is down to them.


As for legislation to deal with the buyer taking water over the border. I can't find a thing.

I did spot a hearing examiner comment on the topic for an historic hearing. His comment led to a form which is not relevant, and has interesting obligations on it, all loaded onto any potential complainant.


More on that when the outcome of the hearings are known.

[awolagain] 11/3/2015 09:42

I love a good quiz...-)

Ok I would post up my permit all around the depot....and maybe get the driver to sign a disclaimer to say he had read the permit....if he wants to take it to the moon is up to him...!

You gave the answer above...
"All Montana have to stop that is policy and conditions in the permit. Legally all the rights owner has is show is the demand"

[superg1] 11/3/2015 09:29

The 4th.

Tim won the prize but no one got the 4th.

John Ames had a hearing on that date for one of his permits. He is seeking permission to sell water to companies that want to take it into ND.

Legally it's hard to see how they can refuse him. All Montana have to stop that is policy and conditions in the permit. Legally all the rights owner has is show is the demand. The other part is that the use is one that would match allowed beneficial uses in Montana, which it is.

So an interesting outcome awaited there too.

Next quiz

You own a depot, and your buyer unknown to you is taking water into ND.

Who is liable?

What is the legislation covering that?

[superg1] 11/3/2015 09:19

round

I've been hunting for a buy of near 60k yesterday and I can't find it so, who knows what they do with trades. 2 days ago anything of that size they wanted 36p plus, so it's always a bit of a game.

[awolagain] 11/3/2015 08:50

Well IG and III are showing us up 4% this am....so if we do nothing say nothing and don't trade we could do quite well after a few months lol!!

[roundup] 11/3/2015 08:46

No trades, no postings, this is glorious. Oh!! I've spoiled it.

[serratia] 10/3/2015 19:55

Thanks monts12.

[monts12] 10/3/2015 19:47

serratia
Someone with DMA (direct market access), usually a spreadbetting client picking off buyers to sell to at a specific price, 33.5p in this case

[serratia] 10/3/2015 19:08

Thirteen small sells today all at 14.40 pm , what's that about ?

[crazycoops] 10/3/2015 17:33

Bogg1e, they are clearly in a bit of trouble. As SG says, it's not likely to be a problem for IOF because someone will want these assets (most likely Chesa) if MPO need to sell but I think it's worth tracking at a high level what's happening.