International Consolidat... Share Discussion Threads

[ny boy] 11/8/2020 09:44

Anyone noticed the double bottom this year off 155p, very bullish technicals, no wonder we are breaking higher, stay long, stay 💪

R1 the medium term target


Support1: 155.10p. Support2: 129.04p
Resistance1: 282.59p Resistance2: 361.40p

[jailbird] 11/8/2020 09:37

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2020-08-08/buffett-s-grim-view-of-air-travel-realized-in-10-billion-charge"In our judgment, the timing and extent of the recovery in the commercial airline and aerospace industries may be dependent on the development and wide-scale distribution of medicines or vaccines that effectively treat the virus," Berkshire said in the filing.

[jailbird] 11/8/2020 09:36

I agree regarding the lack of quality of the product offered... this allowed a lower offering in comparison to other airlines because of the stronghold over Heathrow Interesting about giving up slots, I thought that was unlikely as these are with a lot of money. Unless they are forced to . There is no serious competitor at Heathrow Their nearest rivals are the low cost airlines Buffet said the other day that airline airlines are not investable until a vaccine has been found .

[applepieinthesky] 11/8/2020 08:09

What a vile company corporate greed and corporate manslaughter springs to mind

[lufty] 11/8/2020 08:08

Resistance at 190p clearly breached and the next resistance at 210p already being tested this morning.

[ny boy] 10/8/2020 15:44

Many got duped into selling on the move to 150p, a right royal mugging lol

Idiots, led by this prize chump


davethehorse6 Aug '20 - 11:49 - 19101 of 19156
0 4 0
Going down to 150p folks, suckers rally

[take_that] 10/8/2020 13:05

I do not think I have forgotten, Jailbird. British Airways HAD a monopoly and that was how they got away with the reduction of the product that they offered the business and economy traveller. The marketplace has changed drastically, Heathrow is operating just one runway and still has significant capacity for many more movements before opening up the second runway.Many airline have heavily reduced their frequencies or even ceased altogether. As you say BA have/had a monopoly but if no one wants what you are selling, it's not nearly really valuable. Previously, there was no room at Heathrow for any sizeable competition. That is likely to change going forward. Even BA have said that they may have to hand back some slot pairings, as they have no need for them with the route cutbacks.

[jailbird] 10/8/2020 12:46

But you forget BA has a monopoly of Heathrow Spanish Airlines have monopoly of Spain

[m1k3y1] 10/8/2020 12:41

take_that.....good points

[take_that] 10/8/2020 12:30

@Davidoff, think your missing part of the point those guys are making. I see both as relevant. If the workforce are content, they will be more efficient, more flexible and more productive. Ergo, this increases the profitability of the Company and the shareholders either get a better dividend, more value per share or both.You can have the best pulling cart horse in town but if you keep loading it up unnecessarily, it will go lame and then you will have nothing. WW and AC have cut costs every which way but their own pay. The product is nothing like it used to be. Many important customers and contracts have left in their droves I am told and can well believe. Unless serious TLC is performed now, the BA product will be past the salvageable point. It is this that seriously concerns me. As an investor and a general interest in the transport sector, the way many other airline CEOs have coped with this catastrophic event is like night and day compared to the bad press that the current board have brought on BA. If you look at some of the US CEOs, they really engender support from their workers. This to me is like comparing the Victorian mill owner management, to tech sector, door always open management.I'm desperate to see IAG shares turnaround for my personal gain, I just think that the board need to be innovative, forward thinking and ethical in their decisions, rather than only knowing how to cut everything to the bone....and then some.

[davidoff150] 10/8/2020 12:05

I simply don’t care. You’re irritated and irritating at the same time. I care about making money. How ‘vile’ the company may or may not be is irrelevant to me.

[jailbird] 10/8/2020 09:16

Yes distribution of wealth is a problem that is a widespread problem everywhere If the Co does not want to pay consolidated pay rises which adds costs to basic and pension pay then why not pay non consolidated bonus' to everyone instead IAG are paying themselves both !

[applepieinthesky] 10/8/2020 09:05

Yes completely true share the wealth seems like the company is built on the ethics of the slave traders

[jailbird] 10/8/2020 08:59

Did you IAG Stagg were paid between 10-20% bonus' per year over last 3 years I know of , yet ppl doing the same job on BA contracts were not rewarded the same way All swings and roundabouts if everyone gets their pay rises , just a shame that a strike actions have to take place to get what many deserved

[jailbird] 10/8/2020 08:56

I disagree BA staff were just asking for deserved pay rises that brought in record profits over last few years Why should only IAG staff and BoD pay themselves rises / bonus' /share options with dividends tooDo not all staff working for the group to deserve these bonus'?

[applepieinthesky] 10/8/2020 08:51

I'm only letting you all know how vile this company is

[trikytree] 10/8/2020 08:44

Applepie. Why do you feel the need to come on here every day and call IAG vile? So you’re ex staff and are bitter and twisted. We get it. But move on. Invest elsewhere and leave this board to the investors. Not bitter ex trolley dollies.

[applepieinthesky] 10/8/2020 08:32

Absolutely vile company total greed by its leadership financed by a country with a bad human rights record and links to terror need I say more.

[action] 10/8/2020 08:21

Remember BA Staff went on strike in December holidays pick season and customer suffered. Power is always misused by both parties.

[hamhamham1] 10/8/2020 07:29

Is it true that the managers are only having their pay reduced temporarily? Whilst for cabin crew it is permanent?
A tad unfair, if true.

[davidoff150] 10/8/2020 07:15

This entire board is about pay, benefits and hating on the board. It’s a bunch of lefty liberals hijacking what should really be only about stocks. The discussion should be about valuation, peak to trough thru cycle comparisons, conjecture around supply and demand, broader value vs growth rotation even.. we should be talking levels, where is it overbought, oversold. Technicals, Demark counts, government policy.

Please hold back on the lefty posts that contribute zero to the debate of where to buy, and where to sell this.

[davidoff150] 10/8/2020 07:06

Who honestly cares? This is a board for people who want to make money on stocks - long or short. But what it is not is a place to debate ethics. I couldn’t care less about staff, pay, conditions.. I care about share prices.

[m1k3y1] 09/8/2020 23:41

Watford.....Directors creaming the business while making 10,000 plus redundant is not acceptable by any standard.

They need to be called to account

[watfordhornet] 09/8/2020 12:35

Are you sure it is not bitterness? There are some that are expecting a IAG to carry on as normal and make no one redundant or leave wages as they areThayer are very few people that are not being impacted by COVID - why should IAG be immune from this especially given their industry is impacted more than most.The only argument I see coming back is that the directors are still creaming money out. If so that is bad but it does not justify no action taken on rest of business

[m1k3y1] 09/8/2020 12:20

Triky...what Apple is saying is so true