We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allied Minds Plc | LSE:ALM | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BLRLH124 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 13.85 | 10.05 | 12.65 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
25/4/2024 22:02 | ..an investor call on Friday 26th April at 4pm for the retail.You can register using this linkhttps://www.inve | kooba | |
09/4/2024 11:03 | Quarterly updates were promised, but as ever not really being delivered. I guess it maybe ignorance being a blessing here... | cousinit | |
04/4/2024 16:20 | "optimal structure" Or removal of all those taking a pay packet for doing nowt. | taperkick | |
28/3/2024 09:02 | From Crystal Amber Interims released this morning: It is understood that Allied Minds has sufficient cash to continue until 2027. Nevertheless, Allied Minds has failed to provide positive news flow from its remaining portfolio, with news from Federated Wireless, where Allied Minds has a 24% interest, particularly scant. Earlier in the month, portfolio company Orbital Sidekick launched two satellites, which to date are responding as expected. Given the continuing lack of evidence of realisations and returns of capital at Allied Minds, [Crystal Amber] is currently in discussions with Allied Minds regarding its optimal structure. Good luck with that. | wbodger | |
21/3/2024 19:28 | On Ocuterra, it was a Phase Two trial, and we grumbled about being diluted for not taking part in the cash-call for it, which looks like money down the drain. We now have a smaller slice of a very much reduced pie. It makes the decision much easier for Allied than it would have been if the trial had been a success and further investment was mooted. | wbodger | |
21/3/2024 12:37 | It was always a speculative option and is likely more than offset by the rise in value of OSK. I suppose we will soon find out. Does anyone know when the next investor update call is? | catabrit | |
20/3/2024 19:37 | FFS. hxxps://www.fiercebi | damers | |
07/3/2024 13:48 | Another successful launch by OSK in recent days. | catabrit | |
28/2/2024 07:06 | hxxps://www.globenew | kooba | |
21/2/2024 21:38 | Isn't Elon Musk's company, Space-X the one launching Orbital's constellation? The article doesn't say that MethaneSAT is a direct competitor. You're right to say OSK haven't built their hyperspectral offering yet but they should have a head start in a niche, and I don't see it as necessarily bad for OSK. (There could even be business for them.) At worst a glancing blow as I read it. That Wood Mackenzie quote seems to use words similar to OSK's words in earlier press releases about their specialisation, hyperspectral imaging: ... other satellites typically offer very high sensitivity to emissions at fine spatial resolution or wide spatial coverage that allow the entire globe to be observed within a short time period. Thats a reference to OSK, isn't it. | wbodger | |
19/2/2024 17:37 | OS has no track record of building a business at all and are always late in delivering , also they are out of money just when they should be getting sats 5 and 6 in the constellation up . Google have unlimited finance and sees an opportunity in an area that OS has hardly secured any revenue let alone market leadership in.I like your optimistic take but i find it difficult to think a player of Google's size and commercial reach is anything but unwelcome competition, they can also operate as a lost leader to gain market share...it has been known . Just my opinion. | kooba | |
16/2/2024 15:08 | I view this as incredibly encouraging actually for a couple of reasons. First, competition is welcome as it means the sector has a lot of potential. Second, google do not have the best track record of monetising or growing businesses that are not core. This will be everything to OS and so they will fight tooth and nail for market leadership. | catabrit | |
16/2/2024 13:08 | Federated still going then !!https://www.thefas | kooba | |
11/2/2024 10:28 | I wonder if Ocuterra will be the first cab off the rank, following the release of (positive?) top line data? The spreadsheet tells me that ALM hold an 11.2% interest (giving a NAV of 2.4p a share around the time of delisting). ALM mentioned that this could be a multi-bagger on the last call, so can we expect a pay-out of 5p+? Federated did mention on a recent podcast that some news on the way re new DOD contracts, but agreed all seems very quiet. A nice post from OSK this morning on X. | damers | |
10/2/2024 00:06 | We may be diluted on Orbital, but the constellation seems to be getting launched. I think bobonumber1 posted that the cash runway takes them through this year so we may still have an interest when contracts start delivering. Big numbers, so even a small interest would be worth a bit. (Important that the launch timetable doesn't slip.) Then it's a question of monetising. | wbodger | |
09/2/2024 10:14 | Well so little news..it looks like Federated has disappeared off the face of the planet , virtually nothing out about them for months nothing on social media either..must all be good then ??OcuTerra on the other hand is x'ing like a good 'un so maybe they are excited by the top line results from the phase trial due to be announced in the next 6 weeks or so. All a bit binary on the outcome.https://x.co | kooba | |
21/12/2023 10:54 | I guess the maths I was using, something like this: Raise $72m series D preferred Value of entire equity $72m Pre series D equity = peanuts unless Cerberus willing to pay decent control premium, therefore need to roll dice to drive value | cousinit | |
21/12/2023 10:22 | Oh and love some of your stuff, spec. | catabrit | |
21/12/2023 10:20 | Let us see what 2024 brings. I am just amazed that nobody is running basic math; if your exit revenue multiple halves and your rate of growth is more uncertain, then jam tomorrow is worth a lot less than a fruit pie today in PV terms. Maybe they’re being too greedy and wanting the home run. That is fine but we could always get our money back via a sale of our federated shares to Cerberus and then maintain option value on the rest of the portfolio. It worries me that Crystal Amber are worried / annoyed. | catabrit | |
21/12/2023 09:13 | Randomly woke up in the night and thought "Whatever happened to ALM post-delisting, or Federated Wireless?". Had taken this BB off watchlist. #3383. Seems it's same-old from ALM, only now with less scrutiny. The ghost of Neil Woodford. Sorry to anyone having to waste intellectual energy on this. | spectoacc | |
14/12/2023 20:27 | You should phone Sam Dobbyn if you can find a number. (Missing the Investor Call doesn't matter, it wasn't public anyway, it was by invitation.) Maybe phoning any large shareholder of (formerly) ALM might be productive since you have a large interest. No need for CA to be secretive as it isn't listed now. Maybe they have Sam Dobbyn's number. I don't have many. For me CA is more important. | wbodger | |
02/12/2023 10:06 | There is Crystal Amber who have been on the case for years but can only do so much. They previously offered to wind the business up and as they had significant skin in the game might have been more aligned to getting shareholder returns than feathering their nest ! It was not to be as there has been a supportive fraction that has enabled the farce to continue to where were are today.Shame ..and an example of the dangers of unchecked poor management and governance and unaligned investment managers gambling with shareholder funds.Poor model and a dreadful execution. | kooba | |
02/12/2023 09:06 | It sounds an awful mess. Are there no large institutional investors who can put a brake on those running it profligacy? | zimmie |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions