ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

VRS Versarien Plc

0.1075
0.00125 (1.18%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Versarien Plc LSE:VRS London Ordinary Share GB00B8YZTJ80 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00125 1.18% 0.1075 0.105 0.1085 - 2,227,946 16:35:06
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec 11.64M -8.07M -0.0244 -0.05 363.86k
Versarien Plc is listed in the Chemicals & Chem Preps sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker VRS. The last closing price for Versarien was 0.11p. Over the last year, Versarien shares have traded in a share price range of 0.08p to 6.66p.

Versarien currently has 330,779,690 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Versarien is £363,858 . Versarien has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.05.

Versarien Share Discussion Threads

Showing 194976 to 194995 of 195550 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  7810  7809  7808  7807  7806  7805  7804  7803  7802  7801  7800  7799  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/3/2024
23:14
It was a classic pump and dump, they even kept the news back an extra day to fill their boots ... :-0..
squire007
25/3/2024
22:54
1retirement - "Pre placing pump."

There is no such thing as a pre-placing pump. This is just an ignorant myth spread by PIs who don't understand what's going on.

Placings only work if they are pitched at a price that PIs sellers cannot compete with. That's why they are always at a discount to the current price.

The MM had 492 million shares to sell for which they paid 0.125p. If they pump the stock up to 0.26p prior to the announcement of the placing PIs who bought well under 0.26p cash in their profits so the MM can't shift the placing shares because they are competing with PIs for buyers.

In fact since the announcement of the first deal on 11/03/24 up to 19/03/24 the day before the placing there were 240 million buys and 265 million sells. So about even.

The markets took a genuine interest in the two licenced deals and rerated the stock. There was no placing related pump.

Indeed the last placing was on 19/01/24 at 0.080p. This was a near 50% discount to the previous week's price of 0.15p. There was no deals announced before that placing or any of the other placings since Hodge became CEO. For a placing to work the MM cannot have competition for buyers.

Don't let me hear or catch anyone of you talking nonsense about pre-placing pumps again.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
19:48
Dunning-Kruger. He can't see it, everyone else can.
1retirement
25/3/2024
19:46
Pre placing pump. You not seen this before? You should have arrived on this share a few years ago, you'd have seen it repeatedly.
1retirement
25/3/2024
18:11
Was the re-rating and traction last year also spoiled by a placing when the price went from approx 1p to something like 6 or 7 at the pump peak? Seem to remember you saying a similar thing at the time.

But it's different this time? Pretty sure it was different last time, until it wasn't.

smokeyjohnson
25/3/2024
18:07
Ok smart alec why did the price move from 0.09p on 08/03/24 to peak of 0.26p on 19/03/24 if the markets thought nothing of the deals. What caused the near 200% jump?

That's your homework for evening. Feel free to call a friend.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
17:22
After a decade of fake RNS announcements the markets are not concerned about the size of the deals what they want to see is real traction from real commercial deals signed with real companies. This the market assumes will lead to greater things.

On 08/03/24 the Friday before the Korean deal was announced the price closed at 0.09p

On 11/03/24 when the Korean deal was announced the price closed at 0.11p.

On 14/03/24 when the Brazilian deal was announced the price closed at 13p

On 19/03/24 the price peaked at 0.26p.

So the peak price of 0.26p was reflective of a re-rating until the placing was announced on 20/03/24. Even at 0.12p today the price is between the Korean and the Brazil deal dates, still holding onto the gains from the first deal.

This will rerate again.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
17:03
They stand on their own in that they're separate entities. The value of the licensing deals don't really stand on their own though compared to the debt mountain and the amount they're raising through placings. I would say there was a certain element of timing to the announcements for sure.
smokeyjohnson
25/3/2024
16:46
The two licensing announcements stand on their own unless Montana based in Brazil and MCK Tech based in South Korea were in on the pumping fraud and timed the signing of the deals to coincide with the year end going concern results and the placing.
pwhite73
25/3/2024
16:27
The placing threw a spanner in the works of the rerating after the two licencing announcements but unfortunately it was a necessity to set the company up for the longer plan.

Down again today but I sense we are now at the dregs end of the placing.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
13:56
And it's patently clear that you live in your own fantasy world. As a matter of fact, it's not a question of someone owning more than 3% but of someone going across a reporting boundary. Not happened in 2 years. lol.
supernumerary
25/3/2024
13:31
They pre sold all of them this is just fekking about time again MMs made a killing as usual ffs :-))
squire007
25/3/2024
13:16
Its patently clear you don't know how equity issues work, who gave VRS £615k and what role the MM, brokers and nomads play. Literally all of VRS's new equity would go through the hands of MM. The MM then sell them onto PIs.

There is no TR1s in the last two years because nobody has declared a holding of 3% or more and why would they given what was going on under the previous CEO.

With the new CEO in place and real IP commercial contracts being signed I expect this to change.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
13:00
It's still rubbish - no TR-1 for 2 years! I suggest you find yourself a market maker and ask him what are the odds of him taking on over a billion shares of this dross.
supernumerary
25/3/2024
12:18
supernumerary - When there is a placing the MM advance the money to the company in this case £615k and sell the shares onto PIs, the majority forward sold. They are not in the business of holding placing shares themselves for the very reasons you have quoted.

So although the 492m shares represented a 50% increase no TR1 is required if the MM are the ones holding the shares until they sell them onto PIs. You misunderstood my response if you thought I was implying MM had been accumulating VRS shares. They are certainly not. I hope this clarifies the matter.

pwhite73
25/3/2024
09:57
PW, Will you stand by "never had the chance to buy at the placing price and I doubt if they ever will."?
kemche
25/3/2024
09:54
smokey,

"History rarely dictates the future" made me laugh too.

bbmsionlypostafter mk2
25/3/2024
09:39
But "History rarely dictates the future" so how do you do this?
smokeyjohnson
25/3/2024
09:28
Pretty quiet here today so I was having a flick back at old pots, thinking of doing a TDIH.

Do you know what I discovered?

I discovered that I have the gift of foresight. I could foresee what was going to happen here with eerie accuracy.

Would you like to see some examples?

bbmsionlypostafter mk2
24/3/2024
23:50
pw,

You said "Companies that have an endless supply of mug PIs can get up to 300 posts a day on LSE chat without any specific news."


Well there seem to be many posts on ADVFN every day without any specific or significant news, so that proves your point.

the cronk
Chat Pages: Latest  7810  7809  7808  7807  7806  7805  7804  7803  7802  7801  7800  7799  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock