Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|
21/5/2025 18:19 | Dr Quack, those who wanted to did so above £1.50. Their proprietary system involved reading the accounts, listening to the CEO and meeting him. The myriad announcements at the time made it a slam dunk. Our collective grandmas are very familiar with eggs as I've previously informed you. |  kemche | |
21/5/2025 18:01 | If you are bearish on Versarien, your chance has come: lending fee that you have to pay for borrowing Versarien shares for short selling them catastrophically slumped from 124.6 percent to a very low 0.4 percent per annum. Thus, you can sell them short and just wait for a longer time till Versarien's collapse. Why don't you do it and according to my data has nobody done it for days? |  drjos | |
21/5/2025 16:52 | Buying or selling what exactly ? Dead wood per chance ? There is absolutely nothing related to what we call "business" in any shape or form. It is an empty shell covering a well planned Ponzi Scheme. |  fuji99 | |
21/5/2025 11:41 | They worked out the wrong numbers yesterday ffs, and people use these clowns :-)) |  squire007 | |
21/5/2025 11:20 | Laffable!!! Selling down already ?!! Ffs you couldnt make it up ... too quick boys! Trades are minimal and more buys :-)) |  squire007 | |
21/5/2025 11:10 | kemche20 May '25 - 18:28 - 20827 of 20837 Edit 0 2 0 Peel Hunt also bought into ZED yesterday as a long term institutionalised investor and have begun to sell some today after a long term holding of an entire 24 hours.
According to my cheap proprietary stock lending database.
Gla lth'ers. Including Peel Hunt |  kemche | |
21/5/2025 11:09 | My expensive proprietary model told me they were a long term institutionalised investor. My students are going to be livid.
Bloody long term holders. Grrrr. |  kemche | |
21/5/2025 11:08 | Definition of "Strategic":Relating to the identification of long-term or overall aims and interests and the means of achieving them. |  zydecoco | |
21/5/2025 11:04 | Peel Hunt selling down already |  zydecoco | |
21/5/2025 07:52 | That’s a classic |  davemac3 | |
21/5/2025 07:47 | senden,
I see the Kool-Aid hasn't worn off. So many diverse irons in diverse fires & 7 years later not a one of them has come to anything. Haven't you wondered why?
Proven to be limitless potential downward with the sp, which was 130p when you posted this embarrassing twaddle.
Haven't you lost enough money on this POS? It's not going to come good.
senden11 18 Jul '18 - 12:54 - 21549 of 155084 0 5 0 Added this morning on the welcome drop - I keep telling myself it's the final top-up!Past experience has often made me wary of pre-results buys but this share, somehow, has a very different feel to it as the company appears to have so many irons in various diverse fires, apparently offering limitless potential. Am banking on a solid, forward-looking statement first thing tomorrow and even a slight maiden profit would be a welcome bonus! |  bbmsionlypostafter mk2 | |
20/5/2025 22:05 | Never mind bbm. It’s up to those who are willing to risk. Let the rest… |  smcl | |
20/5/2025 19:22 | No, bbm, it wouldn't suit you and your narrative very well if this were to actually come good, would it? Perish the thought! |  senden11 | |
20/5/2025 19:22 | Yeah, and he's found a new section in the FCA Handbook dealing with optional TR-1s - the rest of us only know about the mandatory ones :¬(
As for the 'costly proprietary stock lending database' - wouldn’t it have been easier, quicker and cheaper to immediately rule out a short as a stupid idea, just as we all did?
DM - except for the incoming whale of course, who's happy to pay a premium :¬) |  supernumerary | |
20/5/2025 19:07 | 16% of the company is about £100k |  davemac3 | |
20/5/2025 18:28 | Peel Hunt also bought into ZED yesterday as a long term institutionalised investor and have begun to sell some today after a long term holding of an entire 24 hours.
According to my cheap proprietary stock lending database.
Gla lth'ers. Including Peel Hunt. |  kemche | |
20/5/2025 17:21 | I believe that Peel Hunt would not disclose its holding if they intend to sell those shares on the open market. So, I expect them to have larger buyers otc eventually or they anticipate higher prices to be able to take on such high inventory risk. I do not believe that their position is hedge by a short position because naked shorts would have been covered at once or covered shorts would have been recorded in my costly proprietary stock lending database. |  drjos | |
20/5/2025 13:17 | Have we been correct since you've been here Mango? |  reality3 | |
20/5/2025 12:31 | Welcome back mango! Hope all is well with you. |  kemche | |
20/5/2025 12:29 | Cornerstone long term institutionalised investor now in. Could they launch a hostile takeover??
Gla lth'ers. |  kemche | |
20/5/2025 12:19 | #20817 DrJOS, in answer to your question, all the prolific, multi-times a day posters on here, would be classed as bears. Certainly not long. All chummy and cheering each other along sarcastically, complacent in being on the 'correct' side as far as has been the case historically, and with the comfortable assumption that this situation can't change.
You'll find very few on here prepared to keep an open mind on the possibilities going forward. |  bluemango | |
20/5/2025 11:38 | PI takes his stake :-)) |  squire007 | |
20/5/2025 11:20 | Peel Hunt have over 16%.
Were they underwriters? |  willoicc | |