We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00125 | 1.18% | 0.1075 | 0.105 | 0.1085 | - | 2,227,946 | 16:35:06 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 11.64M | -8.07M | -0.0244 | -0.05 | 363.86k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/12/2017 15:43 | Tim Just to clear this up once and for all I've looked a little further into what you posted earlier and suggest you read this from 1 February 2017 - Note in particular the last sentence in paragraph 1 - 'This process offers numerous advantages over the conventional graphene manufacturing solutions currently on the market.' Also note the details given in the last two paragraphs. It's quite clear that the patented, proprietary production system for Nanene is, as I suspected, a long way from the generic process posted by you which was published over 3 years ago. It is clear that there are multiple production options to achieve stated scalability. In addition, once we know which company does and which does not meet the ISO specs for VOLUME production - NOT for selected analysis of lab samples - then we can truly compare companies and their offerings. And to date VRS with Nanene is in pole position as far as I'm concerned judging by the commercial 'heavyweights' knocking on VRS's door. | vasilis | |
20/12/2017 14:45 | luckyorange why would I care about AOR going down ? | the stigologist | |
20/12/2017 14:25 | I do not know why we have all started talking about Nanene production processes and quantitities of ingredients used, since TIMBO poked his oar in? While most of it is probably ill-informed, its the last thing NR would want or need! | ridicule | |
20/12/2017 14:04 | Looks like the care home wifi password leaked out today I'll ask them to change it. | superg1 | |
20/12/2017 14:03 | AOR and MSYS doing worse Stig, just the Christmas sell off isn't it! Shorts will close on IQE because it makes economic sense. | luckyorange | |
20/12/2017 13:56 | What "happened" or still happening within 8.5 hours trading or 1 day does not define the space time of a stock. I'll rather look at what's going to happen in 1 to 2 years either to IQE or VRS. Then we could see the difference in share price An engineered artificial share price spike in a day will be a drop in the ocean within 12 months. But one thing is certain: Anything taken by deception and trickery, will lost in very quickly in double volume. Regardless I will still there owning both, VRS and IQE while the tricksters leak their wounds. | fuji99 | |
20/12/2017 13:46 | I told you from the (almost) start. It was a profit warning. Companies do not issue 'Trading Updates' when the City is on holiday if they have a clue. They do it during quiet periods to hide bad news. | the stigologist | |
20/12/2017 13:45 | 'what happened'? you mean... 'what's happening' ? | the stigologist | |
20/12/2017 13:41 | Stig - What happened to IQE today was a systematic work of shorters to kill any positive recovery in the stock because they were so massively exposed that it could be a disaster to both, their job and their Christmas bonus. I am not worried about IQE future at all as today share price forced behaviour does not affect any prospect for long term investors. | fuji99 | |
20/12/2017 13:32 | Use the filter... | richardc77 | |
20/12/2017 13:31 | >>>Phoenix I suggest you put me on filter, that way you won't have to reply and it will help clean the thread up which will be to everyone's benefit >>>>LO I will make this my last post for now, assuming there are no more provocative posts from others which require a response. | timbo003 | |
20/12/2017 13:22 | timbo... it's getting bloody boring again, you don't know that they still use the 'old' Ionic liquid method, NR said at the AGM that the method is very cheap and I would guess that they found an alternative, I don't know either but he does.... ask him, although I don't think that he will give away trade secrets. Talga = Aussie company - enough said. | luckyorange | |
20/12/2017 13:18 | sadly timbo..you are really boring me now.... better you stick to posting on your favourite stock.. there must be so many people interested in you posts over there not.. | phoenixs | |
20/12/2017 13:15 | fuji and superg please tell us again how the IQE shorters got it wrong? fuji99 - 20 Dec 2017 - 08:14:04 - 15954 of 16017 Versarien Developing advanced materials and enabling engineering exploitation - VRS superg I am sure that the IQE fiasco will give a lot of thoughts to the "big time shorters". They need to cut their losses and would need every penny to close the year before being sacked. So my take is they will close every position with profit before they lose all arms and legs. IMO if anyone is shorting VRS, he/she must be mad because there are so many obvious shorts out there and less volatile, than an RNS unpredictable and very volatile VRS. superg1 - 20 Dec 2017 - 07:57:44 - 15952 of 16017 Versarien Developing advanced materials and enabling engineering exploitation - VRS Fuji Yes a spectacular F up there by them and upped their shorts in the last few weeks it shows it's all about trying to scare folk into thinking that they know something. Perhaps also they didn't expect an update pre xmas to screw them up. The news sounds highly promising all round and hopefully the pain will just increase in the coming weeks and months for the funds short. | the stigologist | |
20/12/2017 13:12 | IQE really tanking now Have you noticed how all the experts on the 'IQE shorters' have gone very quiet now? | the stigologist | |
20/12/2017 13:07 | And SG is on record (on the haydale thread) as saying he knows 10x more about graphene than Ray Gibbs, so Ray must be wrong. That's according to SG's twisted, egotistical logic. Also I still don't understand why SG couldnt explain why first graphene resources' graphene looks as good, if not superior to Nanene with respect to most of the important physical parameters, yet can be produced for circa 10p/g (or less) | timbo003 | |
20/12/2017 13:06 | Qfi have a long history of over promising and under delivering - things may about to change if a much heralded rns is issued re a very likely huge fuel trial in Saudi - qfi could quite literally go from being a 100mill cap co to a £3 billion cap at least on Saudi contracts over a couple of years alone - that’s why people are in & including my measly 250k shares - combined with vrs and iof I am quite happy with my aim stock spread for the coming year - only need one to come in.... | pcjoe | |
20/12/2017 12:33 | Strange, I have 5 stocks on my monitor all down by about 5.5% today. | woodpeckers | |
20/12/2017 12:21 | They could recover it useing a Nanene filter ! | loveder |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions