Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[alchemy] 09/1/2020 10:24

So we're people to want stock the price would have to raise far enough to cause some selling. Yes . So that demand will arise on news . Concrete news. MAS has been something of an outlier but every day , Buddy! Holly, it's a getting closer. We've had the big Dip er

[superg1] 09/1/2020 10:19

Stig

You back for round 2?

There has been whole lot going on since you left, good timing.

Such is the nature of a good thing when the global companies see it's real they want. piece and so the bartering starts.

1 in China turned into a daft amount in a flash.

[alchemy] 09/1/2020 10:18

I left SEEing machines fully and came here fully. Out of the 3s into the 5s . I could have bought more of these but I ain't worried none.Per ardua etc. Lots of ardua!

[pshevlin] 09/1/2020 10:16

True Clubbie but that much we already know. I was hoping for specific mentions. Just generalisations for now.

[tini5] 09/1/2020 10:14

Has the sponge peddler made good on his threat yet?

[dudishes] 09/1/2020 10:07

I guess closing short at 82p, of no matter?

Damn good fun, but rather boring all around

[club sandwich] 09/1/2020 09:57

"we're moving from a fossil fuels economy to a materials economy..."

[club sandwich] 09/1/2020 09:56

pshevlin - au contraire. I think the comments about 'circular economy', waste elimination / re-use are highly relevant. For example, these arches - at the end of their lives presumably the polygrene could be reused in new products? You can't really re-use concrete (except for ballast, foundations etc), but you can recycle polymers...

[1teepee] 09/1/2020 09:54

Super g string is still flossing his bumhole with wool directly from his flock, apparently. Just passing on what I heard. A bit like when you lot chat to shorters

[pshevlin] 09/1/2020 09:52

Nothing worth mentioning in the podcast. All about recycling and planning for changes in use of products, structures etc. No materials mentioned.

[club sandwich] 09/1/2020 09:34

But I thought you knew everything?

How very disappointing...

So where are these HUGE deals then Graham?

[superg1] 09/1/2020 09:30

NO, no ego quite embarrassed by it really, city traders quoting PRG points and knowing the guys that lost money, then various other shares, took me by surprise how much they knew.

But interesting to know they are not just robotic traders they actually pay attention to what is going on. In the PRG case they had no pleasure in watching some clients lose everything to a fraudulent scumbag called Manduca.

The post was about showing the guys in the city are not oblivious to what goes on. They know analysts don't really cover the AIM and know various PIs that do a fair bit of work on various shares.

It was a surprise to me.

[adejuk] 09/1/2020 09:28

i wouldn't hold my breath for aecom
the kind of deals they're looking for will take months, a year, to finalise.

[pshevlin] 09/1/2020 09:28

I managed to open it. Just go to first of all and navigate from there.just listening now.

[66sequoia] 09/1/2020 09:24

hTTps://twitter.com/Tweetingbanksy/status/1215179466579873792?s=09 ...... I cannot open the podcast as it's in apple format. I dont know if AECOM will mention the arch or VRS but you never know. Perhaps someone could listen and lets us know if anything worth noting.

[superg1] 09/1/2020 08:42

Bobbie is in a meeting

[grabster] 09/1/2020 08:41

"I have an open invite to their offices."

So does the office cleaner ;-)

[superg1] 09/1/2020 08:34

Well the detail has been sent though.

It seems it's all over something which isn't sensitive. A new player on the block in China which has already been released in news.

Not signing something isn't news, signing something that is price sensitive is.

Roll on if news is forced to say, look the new interest is so bloody good we are considering it pre signing BIGT.

But then it's not news as there is so much China interest x many with the government and Chinese huge companies then it's, just a drop in the China news ocean, hence it was slipped into the interim results. That's the decision of the nomad.


VRS doesn't actually need China at all when you look at all the deals pending.

No I'm not suggesting in any way that China is not on the table.

VRS are in for a very prosperous future

[russ42] 09/1/2020 08:15

I can't see fests sells yet, probably more hot air from him

[superg1] 09/1/2020 08:14

I include Bids in that too.

I don't have to look to know they will thrown in some lies to gild the lily.

I'm not a fan of Bids and have covered the point where I think they misled the market, they were definitely assisted by the nomad, I know I spoke to them and they refused to clarify the meaning of publicly released information.

They were told some investors had misread the information as a positive and thus the point needed clarifying for those buying on negative news.

The nomad refused to explain what it meant saying it was obvious but would not state whether obvious was a positive or negative point.

So no doubt Bids have been harassed too with lies.

[superg1] 09/1/2020 08:08

It's madness

Can I ask that VRS holders contact the nomad and complain that the nomad does nothing at all to combat lies and deceit posted publicly on a daily basis by well known fraudsters.

It causes people to sell on the lies and that is price sensitive.

Not once has the Nomad done anything about it at all. They leave the CEO to defend himself and then give him stick when he left to do it himself.

It's not on. Contact details are in news, I have been ringing this morning.

[loglorry1] 09/1/2020 08:04

Re comments on EU Reach and NanoX. I'm told it can be increased when required. I don't think demand is there yet anyway.

On less than 5 layers. It's been shown that if you go to 5 layers properties get worse for the usual applications of strength as additives for polymers etc. Also that usually means a reduction in lateral size. This is the reason NanoX gives for their sweet spot of predominantly 6-11 layers. I think this view was reiterated by Graphene council or similar and perhaps why VRS did make a small sale of Graphene HP rather than Nanene once.

It may be all BS from NanoX. At the end of the day it comes down to sales for both companies and relative valuations.