Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[east coker] 26/8/2019 19:26

Has this the post (and the MASSIVE number of thumbs up)finally rid us of Fester?



If that is the case, well done to all involved.

#ArrogantFathead

[jointer13] 26/8/2019 17:12

log...simple question... a yes or a no will do. have you ever had to retract a lie you have put on a bb before.

[willoicc] 26/8/2019 16:04

Something can be a millionth the thickness of something else. It is a physical impossibility to be a million times thinner.

Why are people so idle when writing?

[east coker] 26/8/2019 12:42

How's the back mate?

Still excruciating I trust ..

[east coker] 26/8/2019 12:35

I know you're looking on Pete (the down votes are a giveaway) why don't you say 'hello' ?

[sandbag] 26/8/2019 12:31

Continuity trade agreement signed BY UK and S. Korea last Thursday. Given that VRS are active in S. Korea this agreement can only help.

Important step maintaining trading relationship between 🇬🇧 & 🇰🇷: Today @trussliz & Korean Min for Trade, Yoo Myung-Hee, will sign continuity agreement in London, helping to protect trade flow of £14.6bn (2018) & bring continuity for businesses & consumers.

[loglorry1] 26/8/2019 12:03

Soz Tim - that post was in reply to @Hershk who said that the other producers were all fake. It's good you accept that this is not the case and that there is other competion out there. If you are happy to pay almost 2x the market cap for VRS than for NanoXplore (as an example) because you think they are better positioned to exploit a new potential market then all I can say is good luck.

Looking at comparative valuations in a sector is very useful tool. If one company is an outlier its certainly worth asking why.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 26/8/2019 11:55

####INFESTED BY RAMPING TROLLS - IGNORE####

[tim3416] 26/8/2019 11:49

There you go again with your own disconfirmation bias Tim. I'm not and have not said anything about Nano explore or any other companies as I'm not interested or invested in them I really couldn't give a toss about them to be honest. I have chosen to invest my money in Versarien. No one is saying Versarien will be the only manufacturer of graphene and there will be no competition, of course there will. But at this stage in the 2d revolution VRS are as well positioned as anyone to exploit the opportunities ahead. At the moment they have a product verified by both the US and China as being a quality product and the BIGT and others wanting to take large stakes in the company. Not forgetting of course all the other collaborations in play such as AECOM for example. I've been invested here since 10p Tim and have done very well out of VRS since then. Back then we had a lot less information than we do now and I still cannot see anything to make me change my mind on my investment in VRS despite the cynicism from some. Why don't you come back in 12 months and let's see where we are then.

[jointer13] 26/8/2019 11:46

“It is alarming to uncover that producers are labelling black powders as graphene and selling them for top dollar, while in reality, they contain mostly cheap graphite,” says Professor Antonio Castro Neto, director of the NUS Centre for Advanced 2D Materials

[johnveals] 26/8/2019 11:45

Are you invested in NanoExplore? If so why are you posting here, you clearly aren’t invested in VRS, unless you are short.

The reason why most posters here think you are a Tw@t, myself included, is the disingenuous nature of your posts. There are loads of shares out there I wouldn’t invest in but I do not troll their BBs.

So why are you here?

There really is only one logical conclusion.

[ropey] 26/8/2019 11:41

The below is a statement from NanoXplore website :NanoXplore's patented mechanochemical (liquid exfoliation) production process is low cost, large volume, and highly scalable. We take natural forming graphite through an exfoliation process that is environmentally friendly and sustainable. We are currently able to produce 25 tonnes/year of graphene powder production in a plant that is designed with a modular structure. We are excited in the development of our new 10,000 tonnes/year production facility (fully financed) that is currently being constructed in Ville St-Laurent, Quebec. The plant will be built in two phases. The first phase will allow for a production capacity of 4,000 tonnes/year followed by a second phase that will add an additional 6,000 tonnes/year of capacity. These phases should be complete by Q1, 2020 and Q1, 2021 respectively. To date, we believe this is the largest planned production facility of graphene in the world.Should VRS be concerned?

[loglorry1] 26/8/2019 11:14

OK Tim let's just drill down a bit then shall we. Let's assume you are right and the producers I've highlighted above all have inferior "not the real deal" graphene. Let's take NanoXplore and their GrapheneBlack product. Here is the tech sheet



Are you saying that NanoXplore have hoodwinked their customers who are placing orders at the multi-hundred tonne level? Are you saying their tech sheet is wrong and it is a totally inferior product which will be competed out of the market by Nanene? Are you saying that they have hoodwinked investors by raising $31m in a bought deal to build a facility to produce 10,000 tonnes (targetting $10/kg) of this material a year

If you truely belive that Nanene is the only real-deal and that Versarien have the only real scalable low cost prodcution method locked down then I can see that this might justify the very high valuation. Evidence suggests that's not the case though don't you think?

[tim3416] 26/8/2019 11:01

Sorry Tim but you cannot comment on investors confirmation bias with any sort of authority when you and others display such disconfirmation bias towards this stock.

[east coker] 26/8/2019 07:48

#OutOfForce

[east coker] 26/8/2019 07:48

#HilariousScene

[1teepee] 25/8/2019 19:20

hTTps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_Unr3Eu8RpcI've always needed an ice slicer