Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[pshevlin] 05/11/2018 13:39

I think anyone expecting orders to happen over night is underestimating what any company would have to put in place before committing themselves. Firstly they would have to have trialled the material on a small scale and then would have to plan a large manufacturing facility depending on the end product.This is a minimum on top of market estimates potential customers etc.

[grabster] 05/11/2018 13:38

Noticeable that timbo and loggo have made a concerted effort to shift discussion away from today's topic. Unfortunately they've chosen a subject they got nowhere with in the past, and everyone recognizes it's a repeat script. Have they conceded defeat on China already? Or were they taken unawares and don't have an argument ready?

[club sandwich] 05/11/2018 13:37

Chimp - yes, and it came back down again when no hard news materialised. only an order will get it back up there.

[luckyorange] 05/11/2018 13:34

The only downside of being in VRS is having one of the supposedly long term shareholders continually whingeing and moaning .

I have Club Sandwich on filter for that very reason , please don't engage with him he has been extremely rude to everyone who has tried to give him support and deserves nothing off anybody on here.

[cheek212] 05/11/2018 13:33

Looks like Mr Hyde has reappeared!!!

[chimpandy1] 05/11/2018 13:30

"it seems crystal clear than NR comments in podcasts no longer move the price. RNSs about collabs no longer moves the price. The only thing that will move the price is AN ORDER!"

Except the time the share price rose to 180 on no news? Looks like CS is off his meds again

[evanjon] 05/11/2018 13:29

rovi... me too.

[tini5] 05/11/2018 13:15

Did you listen to the podcast CS? The district will do a lot of the work on VRS' behalf.

[festario] 05/11/2018 13:15

Has someone shut the stock market without telling me?Never seen such a gap with no activity.

[mj10] 05/11/2018 13:13

sounds to me like this is almost the first phase to commercial orders and not the end game,but I am happy to hold

[woodpeckers] 05/11/2018 13:12

Take time to finalise the China deal it may well and that is fine by me, let's get it right.

Don't let anyone think though that this means that the share price will be static in anticipation...the company will gradually come under the radar of other investors and reality will start to dawn on the investment world...

I think it's very hard to get your head around the phenomenal potential of this company and if you have then it's equally hard not to become complacent about it. The market cap may, or may not be a fair reflection of the company as it stands. I personally don't think it is anything like a fair reflection of the likely future of the company and as such it is an incredibly exciting opportunity.

[chimpandy1] 05/11/2018 13:09

Neill seemed very confident at then end that the share price will be much higher! "I know where I think we will be" followed by a little chuckle. Happy to wait this one out!

[cheek212] 05/11/2018 13:02

A like the word 'significantly'.

[chimpandy1] 05/11/2018 13:01

I don't remember Indonesia being mentioned before

[potsol] 05/11/2018 13:00

I agree mryl. I got the impression what was described as 'tangible' at the AGM was the non-RNS from this morning. Hey ho, plenty of irons in the fire though.

[mryl] 05/11/2018 12:56

From what NR said in the podcast I don't really get the feeling that the China deal is near.. "takes as long as it takes" and "first real tangible stage in that whole process" doesn't sound like it's imminent... But I'd be delighted to be surprised. As usual NR says they are overun with interest etc and I really believe that the potential is staggering but imo it's gonna take time.

[chimpandy1] 05/11/2018 12:56

"Significantly more than 30" I like That bit!

[realcooltrader] 05/11/2018 12:55

"over 30, significantly more than 30"

[borg45] 05/11/2018 12:54

Not enough

[loglorry1] 05/11/2018 12:45

@schmally I (and @timbo) have shown today (post #45633) that the patent which was applied for
by VRS in 2015 which certainly looks like a patent describing the production of Nanene has been withdrawn becuase it failed the prior art criteria. Ironically
there seemed to be prior art developed in China!

VRS have another granted patent. This may be sufficient to protect the process which they have for Graphene it may not be. I'd have thought it at least requires clarification.

I am not disputing that patents take a long time to be granted and protection exists from the point the application is made. However there do not seem to be any other patents applied for or granted that protect the Nanene IP other than theses two. I may be wrong though and I would be happy to be corrected if others can point them out.



----------------------------------
For those that may be tempted to pay any attention to the resident shorter brigade on here and Twitter, they will now be focusing on the strength of VRS IP protection and patents. Please be aware that Neill has covered this on a number of occasions and it's been discussed at length on this board.

Essentially, patents can sometimes take years to get granted, so although a patent has been lodged by VRS, the process can take a long time. However, as Neill has explained, VRS can't wait for completion of the patent process before forging ahead with building the business. The key to protection for VRS is that only 5 people (I seem to recall this was the number quoted) know the secret of the production process and all are 100% trusted.

The shorter gang have decided to change tack and will now try to insinuate that in the absence of a granted patent for Nanene, that VRS is vulnerable to IP theft. However, those that have followed the story closely, know this is patently untrue.

Yet another dead end from the shorter scum

[potsol] 05/11/2018 12:42

The podcast is out:

hxxps://audioboom.com/posts/7073264-versarien-reabold-resources-and-union-jack-oil

[schmally] 05/11/2018 12:39

For those that may be tempted to pay any attention to the resident shorter brigade on here and Twitter, they will now be focusing on the strength of VRS IP protection and patents. Please be aware that Neill has covered this on a number of occasions and it's been discussed at length on this board.

Essentially, patents can sometimes take years to get granted, so although a patent has been lodged by VRS, the process can take a long time. However, as Neill has explained, VRS can't wait for completion of the patent process before forging ahead with building the business. The key to protection for VRS is that only 5 people (I seem to recall this was the number quoted) know the secret of the production process and all are 100% trusted.

The shorter gang have decided to change tack and will now try to insinuate that in the absence of a granted patent for Nanene, that VRS is vulnerable to IP theft. However, those that have followed the story closely, know this is patently untrue.

Yet another dead end from the shorter scum