Tomco Energy Share Discussion Threads

[riverdiver] 23/3/2012 18:33

harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:32 - 7432 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 17:41 - 7433 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:46 - 7434 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:49 - 7435 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:53 - 7436 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:00 - 7437 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:02 - 7438 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:08 - 7439 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:09 - 7440 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:11 - 7441 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:19 - 7443 of 7445 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:22 - 7444 of 7445 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:30 - 7445 of 7445 (Filtered)

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 18:30

MIKE_COSTER - 23 Mar'12 - 17:23 - 23180 of 23182


At last a day of great posts. I find it really interesting people's differing thoughts on a potential share price. When cb come to toms rescue there was talk of his target for tomco of being £1. Ski who is as well informed as most has put in his header "at least 50p and possibly £1" Peter Epsteins thoughts are anything between 15-20p. He claims that the board want between 20p-30p. I have seen an email from Sk stating he thinks the holiday block is worth uupwards of $5pb. There is little doubt the closer RL get to production the more our shares should be worth. We have had absolutely no hyped up share price at all. There are so many companies with massively inflated sp's. We dont have to search for our resource. I just can't see the board accepting anything less than 20p and if RL are close to production why would they sell the oil for anything less than $10pb?


Get away with you?

Is that a fact? And you say TOM is worth 100p a share


And skidboy agrees with you so it must be true then!
TOM has 1.5 BILLION SHARES IN ISSUE so according to you and skidboy TOM is now worth £1.5 billion. I believe you!

(It is always best to agree with out and out nutters - otherwise they might turn nasty and start stalking you)

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 18:22

riverdiver - 23 Mar'12 - 18:17 - 7442 of 7443


Something rattled their cage?

.....................

YOUR CAGE HAS JUST GOT A GOOD RATTLING - LOSER!

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 18:19

"Peter Epstein left a $3 billion hedge fund where he was a senior analyst to focus on, and invest in personally, a handful of natural resource companiesin which he has a high conviction.. In each case, the company in question has a lot of cash on the balance sheet, is in production or close to it, has a relatively simple or at least proven logisitcs chain and in most cases is an ideal takeout candidate. The risk/reward profile on these stocks is heavily skewed to the upside"
.......................

lol! Is this guy for real or what?

Where exactly does Tomco fit in to his investment model?

A lot of cash in the bank? No!

Is at or near production? No!

Has a relatively simple or at least proven logisitcs chain? No!

Is an ideal takeout candidate? Definitely NO!

[riverdiver] 23/3/2012 18:17

Something rattled their cage?

harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:32 - 7432 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 17:41 - 7433 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:46 - 7434 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:49 - 7435 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 17:53 - 7436 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:00 - 7437 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:02 - 7438 of 7441 (Filtered)


harrissen - 23 Mar'12 - 18:08 - 7439 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:09 - 7440 of 7441 (Filtered)


FuManChuChu - 23 Mar'12 - 18:11 - 7441 of 7441 (Filtered)

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 18:02

MOCKINGJAY AKA PETER EPSTEIN BULLSH+TTING INVESTORS ABOUT TOMCO 6 MONTHS AGO!

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 17:53

....................


LOL! MOCKINGJAY IS EVEN THE NAME OF HIS COMPANY! HOW ORIGINAL IS THAT?

[arsene5] 23/3/2012 15:16

Somehow I doubt it. Stocks always go higher and lower than anyone can rationally imagine.

Always.

[rmart] 23/3/2012 15:14

PURDY1,

best of luck to you, but imo, this will probably be your worst timing ever to sell.

[riverdiver] 23/3/2012 11:19

Nothing wrong in selling and best of luck to him/her but they were such childish posts. I'm surprised he didn't end with 'so there!'

[riverdiver] 23/3/2012 10:49

PURDY1 - 23 Mar'12 - 10:38 - 7423 of 7424


spec 7 good post agree 100% also harrissen good post.after getting band i am now selling the rest of my shares in tom. and that is why you cant sell many shares at the moment as i have a sell order in and all the peps on skiboy thread can blame him. when it drops to 1p. even at 1p i will be in profit so i dont care.anyway i made a large profit when i top sliced at the highs. then i will be laughing gb234 at you... he he.... because after thinking about it long and hard as harrissen says in his post its still a risk.... and also i can invest else where at the moment for a better return.. so good bye tom...

PURDY1 - 23 Mar'12 - 10:40 - 7424 of 7424


oh by the way there will be more sell orders to follow when mm have filled this one...


Childish...

[purdy1] 23/3/2012 10:40

oh by the way there will be more sell orders to follow when mm have filled this one...

[purdy1] 23/3/2012 10:38

spec 7 good post agree 100% also harrissen good post.after getting band i am now selling the rest of my shares in tom. and that is why you cant sell many shares at the moment as i have a sell order in and all the peps on skiboy thread can blame him. when it drops to 1p. even at 1p i will be in profit so i dont care.anyway i made a large profit when i top sliced at the highs. then i will be laughing gb234 at you... he he.... because after thinking about it long and hard as harrissen says in his post its still a risk.... and also i can invest else where at the moment for a better return.. so good bye tom...

[harrissen] 23/3/2012 10:17

Yaris, noli, rmart, etc., do NOT mean well their aim is to deceive potential investors in to believing all is plain sailing once the permit is ratified - this is untrue!! The permit now in dispute is only a conditional permit anyway but those individuals will insist that it is a full permit and RL can go in to full commercial production once they get 'living rivers' off their back. This is not the case - the conditional permit when ratified only allows RL to set up a full scale production demonstration to prove that the ecoshale system will work without the use of water or cause toxic contamination to the ground water and the flora and fauna in the surrounding area.
IMO, the JV partner will not sign any deal or invest money until RL first prove ecoshale works at full scale commercial level. If a multinational has signed as claimed by the rampers why has this important news not been announced officially? Questerre have said they will invest but only when the partner put the $400m in first so if Questerre have not invested we can assume that the multinational has not done so either.
There are too many if and buts with Red Leaf to invest in TOM for the long term at this stage. If Red Leaf fail TOM is done for - TOM's future depends entirely on the success of RL - TOM have no control over their destiny and for that reason is not a company to invest in until they are in control of it.