Rolls-royce Share Discussion Threads

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:24

Y’all mentioned top Investors and their ways to me before, somehow as a vindication even though they don’t hold . Failed to mention their focus on risk of course but that’s ok. It just slipped your minds

We can rectify that discussing it now

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:22

Ok smurfy

No investment is risk free

What risks are attached currently against a breakout occurring? And why have all the buy reasons failed to breakout ?

[smurfy2001] 19/6/2023 18:21

This has got to break out sometime soon. Once it does I'm on the way to 100% profit lovely jubbly.

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:18

Let’s ponder the buys then

No investment is risk free

No doubt you all bought RR 0.1p off its low, knowing BBs

Ok then

Given nothing is risk free, what risks did you guys identify before buying? Why are none of them mentioned here ? And are those risks eradicated today?

II

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:16

This is the problem on BBs

Those calling buy since the high days are ‘well Informed’ and those mentioning risk, have no life

😂

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:15

CREI is a POS btw

Honestly, what you guys be thinking?

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 18:13

Very odd comments from those trolling advfn and LSE boards for years full time

Perhaps if you guys had something of interest in life, not be here ?

[drew lonmenob] 19/6/2023 18:05

He got sacked driving vans Total loon

[pharmaboy3] 19/6/2023 17:57

11 blocked postings in 5 minutes. You need help.Perhaps a proper day job?

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:38

Q1 was wholly artificial

In essence it occurred when the ceo confirmed it’s a dog

Distribution in full swing

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:34

Recent poster was right. It ought to be 175….however, if all was true to form

Ask yourselves why it isn’t?

Should do

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:33

Which is cute in a way haha

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:33

It’s unfortunately technically and fundamentally ‘designed̵7; to look investable today

But that’s just

“InnocenceR21;

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:30

Best buyers I ever saw, pondered risk more than anything else

So it’s good to see it getting covered, even if by a bear

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:27

Cevodniya19 Jun '23 - 13:34 - 12149 of 12158
0 1 0
Institutional Investments, it's blatantly obvious that you are a bear re Rolls-Royce shares, so simply go with your analysis and short the stock.
If you haven't, why post 20 or 30 comments a day on a share you have no exposure too, it's simply nadness.

…..

Cev, I’m glad it’s obvious I am bearish else I would be disappointed with your analysis 😂

I see nothing wrong with analysing both sides of market

You guys are doing the pump side so il cover the risk side

Balance

[drew lonmenob] 19/6/2023 17:25

Jibber jibber loon

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:23

You are all betting on another ‘pig flying’ future project? Great. Hope history doesn’t repeat itself yet again te worth fk all by the time if all gets going. If ever

In the interim, market must work to what is now, what it shall be like in 2028 based on assured flows and whatnot

Not looking good

[institutional investments] 19/6/2023 17:20

CITYTTRADER19 Jun '23 - 14:06 - 12150 of 12156
0 1 0
Don’t think market fully understands todays news

…..

Maybe market just has a different perspective. Problem is, whether market is right or wrong, none of us can beat markets view

[pyglet] 19/6/2023 15:46

I thought there was a competition on.

[standish11] 19/6/2023 15:41

The current government is guilty of many things but I am not yet convinced that they can do much to advance the SMR programme ahead of regulatory approval.

As I understand it the situation remains as per an article last year in Newcivilengineer.com:

Rolls-Royce is expecting to receive UK regulatory approval for its small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) by mid-2024 with a view to powering up by 2029 – two years ahead of schedule.

[mcunliffe1] 19/6/2023 15:15

I suspect (only suspect mind) that the 'news' is the hope that SMR's will provide the growth for RR.

It is the Small Modular Reactors that caused me to invest in RR initially. However, the current government seems not to be moving quickly enough in support of SMR's and I doubt the next government will be any better irrespective of the winning party.

We seem to dislike nuclear in the UK.

We love overly expensive wind farms and solar power and seem prepared to overpay for such; the same will be true of Hinckley as well.

But SMR's, are less expensive to produce than traditional, large reactors and perhaps, if sited in the correct places, would not entice massive planning objections.

We can only hope.

[drew lonmenob] 19/6/2023 15:11

jibber jibber II loon with your 50 usernames from your pikey caravan

[fearny1984] 19/6/2023 15:01

What news is that?