Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[just one more try] 24/3/2023 11:24

The shorts are in over drive – I wonder what has triggered them….

The words from the recent webinar, that I thought were the most illuminating were said by David Hobbs...

If you recall one of the pre-well concerns raised by some people some commentators on Pantheon, was that there wouldn't be enough gas, there was an estimate of around 600 cubic feet per barrel, there was a concern that there wouldn't be enough energy in the system to meet even a 10% primary recovery Factor. In truth what we've seen in, gas is much more compressible than water oil, so it provides the energy to maintain flow without Reservoir pressure dropping as much, and so in simple terms gas volumes that we've seen, and the reservoir being, as close to the bubble point is good news. The flow test tells us there's plenty of energy in the system and that may well translate into higher primary recovery factors.

I understand he knows something or the oil and gas industry. Probably other who are in the Oil and Gas industry will see the facts in the same way. It is clear to me that either Mr Hobbs or Oil and Gas experts know more than the sorters who are merely desperate to achieve a quick buck…

[truant2tb1] 24/3/2023 11:19

WHOOSH!!!!!

[bigdazzlerreturns2] 24/3/2023 11:03

PADAMSTER24 Mar '23 - 10:58 - 4076 of 4076
0 0 0
Haha - soon as I mention Pro
And unhelpful look who who turn up



Well spell your point out without the stupid emoji.

Your desperation of trying to discredit posters is not going to make this stock go up in price. If that’s your only plan you are screwed big time.

This stock is either a dead duck or not.

However betting on one duck over a longer period of time will always result in your account becoming dead that is fact.

Sooner rather than later in E&P stocks.

[padamster] 24/3/2023 10:58

Haha - soon as I mention Pro
And unhelpful look who who turn up 😂

[bigdazzlerreturns2] 24/3/2023 10:48

forwood24 Mar '23 - 10:26 - 4071 of 4073
0 2 0
You're an idiot then! Do you not trade the swings on this?




Forwood I could suggest that message could be pointed at many of the longs on here including yourself. The ones that have been buying at all manner of higher prices and continuing to top up.

To put all ones eggs in a basket is complete stupidity.

If you and others had really smashed the amount into PAnr that’s been suggested you would not be on these boards commenting. As you would be at the point of complete breakdown as life savings would now be showing as worth next to nothing with the very unlikely chance of recovery. The brain would not be able to cope.

[pro_s2009] 24/3/2023 10:40

Pump.... And dump......

[helpfull] 24/3/2023 10:38

Cor blimey, guv!

The 4 week moving average moving down slowly to bottom out at the base of the bearish, ascending flag. It might take weeks to come to a conclusion but the direction is lower:


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com


10p is the target.

Plenty of warning.

Be careful.

[padamster] 24/3/2023 10:37

Forward - don’t say anything to truant as I want him to fail like he is on GDR and NVDA. He must be related to Pro and unhelpful for performance and wording of messages

[forwood] 24/3/2023 10:26

You're an idiot then! Do you not trade the swings on this?

[truant2tb1] 24/3/2023 09:51

I won't be closing till I hit my 10p target!

What a beauty of a short!!

[forwood] 24/3/2023 08:34

The 2 large bids that appeared yesterday have returned this morning:
405k @ 25.5
500k @25

Shorts closing or new buys?

[quazie12] 23/3/2023 23:08

We will see, time will tell fella

[madd_rip] 23/3/2023 19:20

Because he's a fluffer who is always the taker.

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 19:08

You’re busy tonight Helpfull!

Surprised you’ve shown your face as it’s just been proved you’ve been misleading people with your posts and haven’t admitted it or apologised! Why is that?

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 18:47

Cor blimey, guv!

What's all this about then?

"The Board has noted that the votes cast against resolution 5 (22.1%) were slightly greater than 20% of those exercised in total by the Company's shareholders. The Board engages with shareholders on an ongoing basis and reflects carefully upon the feedback received"

Are the seeds of future troubles being sown?

Be careful.

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 18:44

Misleading, misleading…230;………hoist by their own petard!

[forwood] 23/3/2023 18:41

canthelpit - actually, there was a 1m buy day before yesterday, trade no 278 at 12:30 which cost 26.22.

[elhank] 23/3/2023 18:23

In response to 4045 and the question of whose opinion is worth more I can tell you it is olderwiser's. This is without doubt 100% factually correct.Good luck.

[olderwiser2] 23/3/2023 18:22

Gotcha again Jak, sleep it off if you must

[olderwiser2] 23/3/2023 17:57

JakNife 4052
Don't go changing your context now, you posted

"There is also sadly absolutely no proof that it *IS* commercially viable"

And there is doubt there is some proof, that it is commercially viable, if you wanted a binary outcome statement you failed

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 17:32

That’s cutting Helpfull, ouch!

In answer to your questions:

1) I didn’t know that. How could I?
2) I could, but I won’t