ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

PANR Pantheon Resources Plc

20.20
0.50 (2.54%)
22 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pantheon Resources Plc LSE:PANR London Ordinary Share GB00B125SX82 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.50 2.54% 20.20 20.25 20.65 20.85 19.70 20.00 1,570,624 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Natural Gas Liquids 804k -1.45M -0.0015 -135.00 186.01M
Pantheon Resources Plc is listed in the Natural Gas Liquids sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PANR. The last closing price for Pantheon Resources was 19.70p. Over the last year, Pantheon Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 10.20p to 45.50p.

Pantheon Resources currently has 944,218,427 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Pantheon Resources is £186.01 million. Pantheon Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -135.00.

Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 40276 to 40295 of 63525 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1617  1616  1615  1614  1613  1612  1611  1610  1609  1608  1607  1606  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/3/2023
06:43
Pro and his strategy lol!! His portfolio is biggest loser on advfn, don't follow ;)
maxxy1
23/3/2023
06:07
Oh and you forgot Texas lol.
mlf51
23/3/2023
05:25
Truant2tb1 4014

What a complete load of agenda driven rubbish, "horizontally vertically makes no difference"

An entire oil production renaissance grew on the fact horizontal makes a difference

What we await is the proof beyond any doubt that it is commercially viable, there is absolutely no proof that it is not commercially viable, for that you need, no oil flow and data to show there never will be.

olderwiser2
22/3/2023
22:46
You can test it horizontally, vertically, inside out or back to front!Makes no difference!!There's no commercially viable reserves here, that's been proven beyond a doubt10p being VERY generous ?
truant2tb1
22/3/2023
22:42
https://mobile.twitter.com/truant2tb/status/1638671826908856321
truant2tb1
22/3/2023
18:06
More lying from fluffer number 3
madd_rip
22/3/2023
17:39
Pos - you're dealing with someone, maybe more than 1, who does not understand drilling wells and hasn't bothered to find out. The engineers who freely give their time and expertise on Discord and sometimes here, will tell you that having cased and cemented the vertical in a 5 and a half inch pipe, you cannot now do a lateral from it. This post from GeodesRrocks49, discussing Alkaid 2, concurs:

'Three abbreviated thoughts. #1.) Existing well is cased and cemented. Can easily perforate and frac. Must however place a bridge plug just below the SMD completion interval to isolate the Alkaid ZOI. Economical standard practice and will be a vertical vs horizontal. Most of Prudhoe Bay wells were / are verticals.
#2.) Can't horizontally drill from inside a cased 5-1/2" diameter well bore. But can complete the SMD because it is behind pipe. Future wells would be horizontally drilled as new wells.
#3.) The SMD Could be a commercial production well - but limited on the ability to flare gas by the AOGCC. Any long term production from the Alkaid pad will require gas injection / disposal. Flaring was granted for testing purposes only - never for producing any wells long term.
Pantheon is fully aware and addressing these advantages and the disadvantages --- period. Me? Long term holding. Birth pains of an Alaska giant field.'

forwood
22/3/2023
17:04
I’m not misleading - it’s as clear as day in the written word.

I repeat, it’s ok for you to acknowledge you misinterpreted or misunderstood, I believe many others have as well, both on here and on Discord (it is they that have assumed something, likely because optimism bias kicked in and they probably ‘hoped’ it would be a lateral as that would likely have more positive impact if the test was successful)…………it’s good to make mistakes (I’ve done it enough times!), because that’s how we learn.

Take a step back and read the words in the RNS:

There is ZERO mention of a lateral/horizontal into the SMD.

There is ONE mention of “TESTING the shallower Shelf Margin Deltaic ("SMD") zone in the shallower VERTICAL SECTION OF THE WELL BORE”

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:55
Cor blimey, guv!

I'm sure that post has some meaning. But it is lost on me. I was simply pointing out you were misleading. Whether deliberately or not, I'm not too sure. I was not debating.

Be careful.

helpfull
22/3/2023
16:47
Helpfull - it’s absolutely fine to misinterpret or misunderstand something, and shows a good level of maturity and humility to acknowledge that, both to yourself and others.

As I said, all the best 👍.

PS - not like you to get caught up in a debate like this tbh, it almost feels like you have an ego and it’s been bruised, I thought you were just one of those posters that does rinse and repeat and didn’t care what others thought of what you write.

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:44
Cor blimey, guv!

No. I have read and understood what was written.

It does not say whether it will be tested vertically or horizontally.

You have made an assumption.

Be careful.

helpfull
22/3/2023
16:43
OD:

The words neo used were “Even of (sic) they do enter smd to test, they still need to drill horizontal well along”

“EVEN if they do” and “still” infers he was referring to previous comments about testing the existing wellbore in the near term.

We can all get caught up in semantics (feel free to debate with Helpfull on that one!).

Can’t comment on the risk sorry, that’d be one for geos and operators.

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:36
Helpfull - you may choose to think that, but you are incorrect in coming to that conclusion.

You (may) have misinterpreted or misunderstood what has been written.

You may argue that I may have also misunderstood or misinterpreted, but you’d be wrong in doing so.

All the best.

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:35
POS think chap was inferring they need to do horizontal and who would disagree.At least it would be (presumably) the same spot as the vertical this time, so less risk?
officerdigby
22/3/2023
16:30
Cor blimey, guv!

I think they are simply telling the reader the SMD zone is shallower. I think you have made an assumption which might be correct or might be wrong. I certainly wouldn't like to chastise anyone based upon that.

Be careful.

helpfull
22/3/2023
16:25
Helpfull - if that was the case, they wouldn’t have used this extract, as it would be superfluous:

“……;.. in the shallower vertical section of the well bore……….”

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:21
Cor blimey, guv!

I think that tells the reader the SMD zone is upwell from the horizontal in the shallower vertical section of the well bore.

It does not say if they will be testing vertically or horizontally.

Be careful.

helpfull
22/3/2023
16:12
20th March - AGM webinar and corporate update:

“Future operations at Alkaid will now focus on moving up the well bore and testing the shallower Shelf Margin Deltaic ("SMD") zone in the shallower vertical section of the well bore after plugging the Alkaid zone of interest (ZOI) reservoir.”

One would hope that people who like to comment so much would read the content of RNSs to ensure they are fully appraised of what the company is telling them.

probabilityofsuccess
22/3/2023
16:03
Cor blimey, guv!

Which RNS are you referring to? Can you give the date the clear statement was made?

Be careful.

helpfull
Chat Pages: Latest  1617  1616  1615  1614  1613  1612  1611  1610  1609  1608  1607  1606  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock