Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[sirmark] 23/3/2023 16:50

Decent closing auction
16:35:18 26.20 306,815 80.39k UT

Let see if the US can look after the batten over night.

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 16:47

Cor blimey, guv!

I take it from your pedantry your intent is to be my troll.

Just like Madd_rip. I miss him and his swearing. I suppose he is on the corner of some street shouting at passing buses and using his pornographic references to cause outrage.

Do you know I've forgotten your post already and couldn't be bothered to scroll up to look at its content.?

Could you post it again?

Be careful.

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 16:28

Right - I’m back vertical again (in this context I mean not horizontal or lying down Helpfull).

Helpfull, you said:

“Have you noticed that the shorters do not sell out and nobody buys 1 million shares”.

shorters do not sell out, they buy back, please Be careful with your language.

I’m sure at least one person (a body, in your terminology) buys 1 million shares at some point.

Please stop misleading others (or are you just misunderstanding what others are writing (again)?)

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 16:18

Cor blimey, guv!

Every day the shorters sell out.

Every day there are two buyers waiting on the sidelines for 1 million shares.

Have you noticed that the shorters do not sell out and nobody buys 1 million shares.

The traders need your money. They will say anything to get it. Mark the names and expect the same tomorrow and every day.

Be careful.

[forwood] 23/3/2023 15:29

Shorts closing or new buys? A few 'O' sellers here and MMs are simply passing them on to the bid. I'm hanging on - the daily chart, as I said a few days ago, is turning up.

[olderwiser2] 23/3/2023 15:17

JakNife 4045
Here you go, this part is the nonsense, but you knew that when you wrote it

"There is also sadly absolutely no proof that it *IS* commercially viable and there are express statements from your BoD stating that it's *NOT* currently commercial but that they hope in time that it will be commercial."

What standard of proof is required to overcome your "no proof" one bit of proof. two or three, an entire jury of 12. No proof would be zero proof, correct ?
Flowing oil
Well data
BOD statements

[sirmark] 23/3/2023 15:15

Don't give up your shares chaps... they are trying to get some sellers to help close their shorts. The two large orders I suspect are part of it and the increasing of the bid trying get a few weak sellers out. They punished us on the way down, we can now only try to make it as difficult as we can by holding on and riding this back up.

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 15:08

I’m well bored - going for a horizontal (that’s a lie down to you, Helpfull)

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 15:02

Cor blimey, guv!

"The RNS clearly states they’ll be testing the vertical wellbore"

How many times. It doesn't say that. It says:

"Future operations at Alkaid will now focus on moving up the well bore and testing the shallower Shelf Margin Deltaic ("SMD") zone in the shallower vertical section of the well bore"

Future/focus are the operative words. However, I'm bored. I'll give you the opportunity of the last words. Your statement was misleading.

Be careful.

[probabilityofsuccess] 23/3/2023 14:49

Helpfull - nice try, but now you’ve adopted the obfuscation approach.

All your previous posts were asking where it said the test would be “vertical̶1;. The fact the you had highlighted the word vertical conveys what you were trying to understand (given your focus on absolute detail of wording, I’m sure you were very careful about this).

As such, I contend that you did indeed misunderstand the wording of the RNS but instead of accepting that (both to yourself, and others on this board), you pushed on regardless because your ego could not deal with admitting making a mistake (which is ironic, because that admission in itself would not only make you feel better about yourself, but could be seen by others as positive self-reflection and an ability to learn and mature………which in turn may help others give more consideration to your views)

Hey ho!

[sirmark] 23/3/2023 14:47

Current book

25.9 22 14:39
25.9 16 14:40
25.94 38 14:41
25.96 1,950 14:39
25.98 20,000 14:22
26 54,316 12:05
26 10,000 14:29
26.12 10 14:39
26.24 12,675 14:40
26.76 15,000 ARDA 14:29
26.84 8,063 14:32
27.18 15,000 STFL 14:29
27.26 15,000 PEEL 14:40
27.3 15,000 WINS 14:41
27.3 15,000 INV. 14:41
27.3 15,000 MREX 14:41
27.3 15,000 SCAP 14:41
27.3 15,000 SING 14:41
27.3 15,000 CANA 14:42

[sirmark] 23/3/2023 14:43

Now Two large BUY orders on the book

total volume today 650,000 shares... two buyers looking for just shy of 1million.

Time to buy

Order book now has two big buyers on the book

4:34 405,072 25.5
14:40 3,459 25.5
14:32 16,089 25.34
14:13 3,744 25.22
14:39 12,812 25.22
14:32 37,342 25.06
14:18 500,000 25

[sirmark] 23/3/2023 14:30

Nice 500,000 buy order on the book

[rabito79] 23/3/2023 14:30

They can't use present or current because the operations are not underway yet.

[olderwiser2] 23/3/2023 14:09

Jaknife 4026

You keep right on spreading disinformation as is your brief, but here is a statement that carries weight v your opinion that has lost any credibility it ever had

My key takeaway really is, that any technical reading of the data suggests that the likelihood of commercial viability of the Alkaid project is higher today than it was prior to the well, we've gathered enough data to address some of the risks identified pre well, and the deliverability of the reservoir has been shown to meet or exceed those pre well expectations, and comfortably exceed what's required to underpin commercial development,

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 14:05

Cor blimey, guv!

Future is the word the company used.

They could have used present or current.

But I'm told a rabbit stuck in the headlights puts all its faith in the future because the present looks decidedly hostile.

Be careful.

[rabito79] 23/3/2023 13:59

Helpful, future is used because they can't do it in the past.

[helpfull] 23/3/2023 13:55

Cor blimey, guv!

"Future operations at Alkaid will now focus on moving up the well bore and testing the shallower Shelf Margin Deltaic ("SMD") zone in the shallower vertical section of the well bore after plugging the Alkaid zone of interest (ZOI) reservoir"

Love to explain.

It means after the fiasco of Alkaid 2 in which the failure of a 5,300ft horizontal was shown to produce only 180 bopd (before inevitable declines), any future operations at Alkaid, if the company eventually decides how it can move on from here, will be at shallower levels or up pipe in the SMD, which is located in the vertical section of the well bore. The vertical section of the well which comes before the horizontal. By necessity the Alkaid zone of interest would have to be plugged.

It does not mean that the company intends to do this. That is why "future" is used. It may or may not. There is no commitment. It is just conjecture on the part of the company because no decision has been made.

Be careful.