Oxus Gold Share Discussion Threads

[weegeordie] 14/12/2015 06:25

You missed one - BWTFDIK!!

[wulber] 14/12/2015 01:23

Its not fact, as fact = RNS.Its my expectation, DYOR, NAI, IMHO etc

[wulber] 14/12/2015 01:22

PennyfallsCheck out the case law - average award being 1/3 of highest of dcf range, being $1250 mn plus compounded at Libor + 2%.Calunius figure n range of 6 - 8 times amount invested minus 50% of legal fees paid.Go figure!

[wide boy] 13/12/2015 23:52

Think even 10p is pushing it.

[pennyfalls] 13/12/2015 23:46

Wulber...are your posts actually serious??

On your calculations based on other awards??? You either can't read, are ramping it up to high heaven or just spouting nonsense.

Anyone with half a brain can see it won't get near that on "past awards" unless we are one of a very select few.

You've no credibility in my eyes when you say such things as fact.

[wulber] 13/12/2015 23:26

As we know, deliberations and case closed.BoD waiting for panels verdict and award.By my calcs and based on other awards looking at circa 40 - 60p ps

[hairballradical] 13/12/2015 23:08

GS,

very helpful to all on the board, thanks.

By my reckoning its $32M as at 2006 but then they were making profits prior to loss brought about by a reduction in quality of ore recovered.

[giant steps] 13/12/2015 22:30

HBR, the sums were done years ago on this thread if you care to look

[hairballradical] 13/12/2015 22:12

GS,

so that's a no from you. Anyone else done the sums?

[the stigologist] 13/12/2015 21:37

The longer term weekly chart...

[apfindley] 13/12/2015 20:43

CutandpolishRossann If you note the metal tech case, they didn't have jurisdiction Fortunately Oxus DOAnd their case is with merit, so its essentially all about coming to a final provable figure for the value of the assets which were, ahem, misappropriated.

[festario] 13/12/2015 20:23

Dave, there is a big question of how it is all handled. It could be quite a while to resolve.

[dave444] 13/12/2015 19:58

What will tomorrow bring?
I am going on holiday for 2 weeks next Sunday so could do with this being sorted this week!

[giant steps] 13/12/2015 19:53

HBR, you could make the obvious trawl through historic accounts

[hairballradical] 13/12/2015 19:30

Does anyone have a solid figure for sunk costs?

[pennyfalls] 13/12/2015 14:32

Yes, unfortunately cutandpolished61, you may not like the answer to your(unintentionally) back- loaded question. The answer may surprise you to an extent you should have asked the question the other way around.

Unfortunately, over-arching systemic corruption can meander down through all levels in the system. That's how it prospers.

[cutandpolished61] 13/12/2015 12:25

reflecting on the above do we actually know of an arbitration case won by the uzbec government?

[papillon] 13/12/2015 10:53

1zabrina. This is what the RNS dated 30/9/15 states. It specifically states that:

"The Group currently awaits the decision of the Arbitral Panel with regard to the merits and the quantum of the UNCITRAL arbitration claim against the Republic of Uzbekistan, the arbitral hearing having taken place in Paris in late April / early May 2014."

Is that statement contained in the RNS a lie, 1zabrina? Is that what you are saying?

I think you are being very devious, 1zabrina and your posts are NOT to be trusted. You are posting your conjecture as fact; you are implying you have inside information.

1zabrina? Filtered.

[wulber] 13/12/2015 10:39

I was told the same last week Nick.

[1zabrina] 12/12/2015 21:38

who did you speak to Nick????, disciples can be quiet now, let nick post his source at oxus.

who did you speak to??

[giant steps] 12/12/2015 21:15

Reminder for Central

13 June 2008 Richard Shead
joined the board as a non-executive director.

Total Package prior to arbitration

2007 None
2008 $35K
2009 $336K
2010 $449K
2011 $250K