We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxus Gold | OXS | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 3.125 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.125 | 3.125 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 08/8/2022 15:16 by maytrees Even if OXS had held strong in Russia, its "assets" would now have zero value and the company nationalised anyway.The above is the least of the problems caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the hideous crimes against humanity being committed there. |
Posted at 22/3/2022 09:17 by maytrees I wrote my OXS holding off years back but find all the comments above interesting - tx. |
Posted at 30/4/2020 19:44 by festario No special dividend was ever paid to me, I'll tell you that. |
Posted at 30/4/2020 19:05 by bufala when was the special dividend paid? |
Posted at 30/4/2020 11:10 by heardowt I think they sold the project and paid out a special dividend if my memory serves me right. |
Posted at 25/4/2020 15:27 by marmar80 Very good. I recovered some, but still in red with Oxs. Gambled too much but lesson learnt. Today a lot of cheap shares around but hard to decide which one will can do well. |
Posted at 24/4/2020 00:46 by festario Trying to make it back.... in IOF and GAN.Actual cash generating companies with healthy balance sheets which are undervalued.OXS was a scam, and I'm trying avoid any more such disasters. |
Posted at 07/6/2019 08:44 by sos100 Possibility of an appeal to the supreme courtNo mention of the significant dividend error in this appeal but struck out because of the use of some documents and dates of letters and no conflicts of interest! |
Posted at 30/4/2019 16:13 by wulber CHL gone, now just OXS for me left as an arbi play. One's got to come good surely! |
Posted at 28/3/2019 13:28 by nick2412 The arbitrators evidenced their 'no expropriation' finding based on AGF being so profitable that it allowed a 65.7m USD dividend to shareholders. Factually incorrect and the dividend was nothing to do with AGF or even Uzbekistan. This alone surely requires a 'set aside' decision:-749. None of the events prior to 2007 reach, either separately or collectively, the threshold of depriving Claimant of its investment. The fact that the State actions taken in 2006, including the Complex Audit 2006 and the change in the VAT regime, may have had adverse effects on AGF’s operations and profit is per se not sufficient to constitute an “expropriation that Claimant paid out in 2007 a dividend of US$ 65.7 million to its shareholders as a result of its operations in Uzbekistan (see above para. 555). |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
