Oxus Gold Share Chat (OXS)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Oxus Gold	LSE:OXS	London	Ordinary Share	GB0030632714	ORD 1P

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	+0.00p	+0.00%	3.125p	0.00p	0.00p	-	-	-	0	06:30:09

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Mining	0.0	-1.9	-0.4	-	22.11

Oxus Gold Share Discussion Threads

Showing 33301 to 33323 of 33325 messages

Chat Pages: 1333 1332 1331 1330 1329 1328 1327 1326 1325 1324 1323 1322 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
21/7/2017 00:29	That should be forwarded to BDO lawyers imo, they still can use it zaphod99. Imagine only, if that's true, Oxus would be awarded at least a new arbitration attempt!	marmar80	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 22:09	On the subject of White & Case and conflicts of interest, we never did get to hear why the arbitration panel did not acknowledge the blatant conflicts of interest surrounding dodgy Carolyn Lamm in the Oxus case. How can such a decision be allowed to be hidden behind a cloak of confidentiality? Yet another decision that appeared to be biased in favour of the corrupt Uzbek government and their legal counsel and paid lobbyist Carolyn Lamm.	zaphod99	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 21:59	hTTps://www.legalcheek.com/2017/07/acted-recklessly-white-case-hit-with-record-250000-fine-over-conflict-of-interest-breaches-in-ukrainian-oligarch-case/White & Case hit with record £250,000 fine over conflict of interest breaches in Ukrainian oligarch caseA partner was also fined a further £50,000White & Case has been hit with a mammoth £250,000 fine by the regulator after it accepted it had breached rules in relation to conflict of interest and client confidentiality.The financial penalty - set by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and later approved by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) - is the largest ever dished out to a single firm.The fine is connected to White & Case's handling of a multi-billion dispute between Ukrainian businessmen. In 2014, the High Court blocked the firm from acting for Ukrainian client Victor Pinchuk over fears of a conflict of interest, Mr Justice Field concluding: "White & Case will be enjoined from acting for Mr Pinchuk in the Commercial Court action."On this, an SRA notice published yesterday afternoon states White & Case allowed work to be carried out without taking "adequate steps" to ensure that "no conflict or significant risk of conflict existed between the interests of clients." Moreover, it reveals the global giant accepted instructions without taking steps to ensure "the confidentiality of information provided to the firm by clients was protected." In doing so, White & Case admitted it "acted recklessly".In addition to the hefty firm fine, the SRA also hit White & Case partner David Goldberg with an individual sanction of £50,000.Goldberg - a solicitor-advocate specialising in international commercial law - admitted acting for clients where there was a "significant risk" of a conflict of interest. Furthermore, he accepted that he: "provided confidential information concerning the work being undertaken on behalf of a client in one matter to a partner in the firm involved in acting on a matter giving rise to a significant risk of a conflict of interest between clients."The notice then adds:For the avoidance of doubt the SRA did not allege that the firm or Mr Goldberg acted dishonestly. Further, the SRA, having considered the evidence submitted by and on behalf of Mr Goldberg and the firm, did not pursue allegations of lack of integrity against either Mr Goldberg or the firm.A spokesman for White & Case said:While it would not be appropriate to comment until the SDT has published its judgment, we have been cooperating fully with the SRA and accept the orders which will be made by the SDT. We are committed to upholding the legal industry's highest standards at all times, in all of the jurisdictions where we operate.Until yesterday, the highest ever financial sanction handed out to an individual firm was to Clyde & Co. In March, Legal Cheek reported that the City outfit had been slapped with a £50,000 fine for breaching money laundering and accounting rules.	zaphod99	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 06:49	The last I heard he was digging for gold in Kazakhestan with Hambledon mining...	abrahe00	Read Full Thread Reply
19/7/2017 10:22	Where is Bill now?	marmar80	Read Full Thread Reply
19/7/2017 10:12	When Bill made that promise in 2002/3 the share price was 11p, a year later it was nearly 90 p. When bill left at the end of 2007 it was 44p, but dividends in specie of Marakand shares and Kazakhgold were worth 14p. That is pretty much an investment of a lifetime!!!!! He built three mines... Amantaytau.... Vysi..... and Jerooy. After he left......Nothing was ever built again!	jrangy01	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 15:12	53 mate, I suppose that's old. Feels it.	festario	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 14:54	Fest, yes, I know it was Grattan. My mum used to get both Gratton & Kays catalogues. Always looked forward to them.The only porn I could get in those days :0) So you're an old git as well then :0)	lithological heterogeneities	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 14:28	Ha ha, Lith,... that's Grattan, and I should know I used to work there!	festario	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 11:52	Research!? I don't need any research to know that this is a dead-end. PIs get too emotional about these things and I understand everyone's sense of anger at the apparent injustice that's been served against us, myself included. But, this is not about justice or fairness! It's about who had the better lawyer and the resources to buy decisions. If it ever went to another tribunal, I don't expect a different decision. Gretton know it, the administrators now it and most importantly, the Uzbeks know it. Now, I may have gotten the name of the litigation funder wrong, but that's only because I wrote this off a long time ago and only stumbled across the BB after all this time. FYI, I've been invested in OXS since the days of Bill Trew and his "investment of the century" promise. I wish you guys all the luck but life's just too short... AIMHO. E.	abrahe00	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 09:59	Yeah, they might think they are the catalogue people from the 60's/70's.Those were the days as a young boy,waiting for mums new catalogue with the latest lingerie section.No internet then and no tv after around midnight from our 3 channels. Just a white dot or a test card.You try telling the kids today that and they just won't believe you.:0/	lithological heterogeneities	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 09:14	Can't be sure without getting Doc's from the Swiss court, but the court might of been 'confused' as to exactly who Gretton are. I'm not sure Gretton will get anywhere with their appeal.	jack1236	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 08:55	abrahe00-what research have you done here? not much to be honest. all further action in relation to this appeal is funded by the litigation funder. people can keep saying the same stuff but i don't see this as being over...	sos100	Read Full Thread Reply
12/7/2017 08:05	Agreed Colin... Two HUGE "if"s here... IF we get a partial annulment and IF there is further arbitration. OXS doesn't have the money for further arbitration and I doubt that Griffin or anyone else will want to foot the bill this time. Even if they raise the money, another round of arbitration will take many more years to go through the courts with no guarantee of a different outcome. Write it off and move on...	abrahe00	Read Full Thread Reply
11/7/2017 16:29	Ehh - "no prospect" sums it up... "Except to the extent that the Company is successful in obtaining a partial annulment of the arbitration decision and subsequently obtains a significantly larger award in a further arbitration, there is no prospect of funds becoming available for distribution to the Company’s preferential and unsecured creditors, or shareholders."	colinhall	Read Full Thread Reply
10/7/2017 12:39	There is a fighting chance, which is what we've got!	wulber	Read Full Thread Reply
10/7/2017 11:49	Not yet anyway	mudskipper73	Read Full Thread Reply
09/7/2017 12:43	temmujin Sep '13 - 21:28 - 19 of 48 0 0 just heard a rumour that the uzbeks are going to make an offer...also rumour that they are buying oxus shares Yet again TEMMUJIN TYPE LIE "also rumour" WELL they DIDNT BUY so LIE yet again	tevita	Read Full Thread Reply
09/7/2017 12:40	typical TEMMUJIN LIE "NEWS IMMINENT" 15 Aug '13 - 10:55 - 10 of 48 0 0 TRUST ME...NEWS IMMINENT...COULD BE FRIDAY BY WHAT IM HEARING	tevita	Read Full Thread Reply
09/7/2017 12:37	so what went WRONG with this ONCE IN A DECADE OPPORTUNITY 16 Jul '13 - 22:15 - 5 of 47 0 0 EVERYONE TRUST ME ON THIS....ONCE IN A DECADE OPPORTUNITY	tevita	Read Full Thread Reply
08/7/2017 20:50	follow TEMMUJIN and you might end living in a BROKEN down VAN like he does	tevita	Read Full Thread Reply
08/7/2017 20:47	READ this thread and see the LIES he posted CON MAN	tevita	Read Full Thread Reply
08/7/2017 20:20	yes i was wrong on oxus...no one is 100% right not even maestro	temmujin	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 1333 1332 1331 1330 1329 1328 1327 1326 1325 1324 1323 1322 Older