![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.02 | 0.10% | 19.50 | 19.10 | 19.48 | 19.94 | 18.80 | 18.80 | 503,121 | 16:35:05 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0342 | 5.70 | 63.2M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
25/6/2024 17:36 | I have evidenced you talking of massive settlements shortly before you left the board..fact.You encouraged scrutiny to prove how clever you were...fact is you are not ..you are everything you accuse others of, just a punter who got over excited. | ![]() kooba | |
25/6/2024 17:30 | This is exactly why you are such losers. As soon as anyone turns up who disagrees with you gang up on them and use every means to bully them off. That's how come you ended up in a bubble of make believe and didn't benefit from sharing group knowledge and wisdom. It wasn't that you were lied to or misled by Tenner at all. It was that you will do anything to control the narrative. Now everyone can see just what you all did to yourselves by being so stupid. ------- I'm not going to go back and check the context of that post because I know that I could find many more posts when I warned about the likely quantum and so can anyone else who's interested, which I doubt. The fact is you're the ones who were wrong all along and still are. | ![]() terrorwit | |
25/6/2024 17:28 | He has a chance to defend the post if he wishes to...it's seems pretty clear to me that they were very very bullish on the litigation outcome and what the settlement could be...They stopped posting in April 2022 shortly after this post so there is nothing much else till after the settlement. Unless there were other accounts in that period...but I don't remember anyone cautioning on the outcome to be honest..there was such a confident messaging from the company and their marketing it all encouraged a very positive outcome.It's not surprising people like Nige got carried away I guess. | ![]() kooba | |
25/6/2024 17:18 | What was the context of the post then? | ![]() chilom | |
25/6/2024 17:18 | Worthless and wrong again..at least you admit you are Nige unlike other reincarnations where you lied ..go get another id try again this one is broken..maybe its not the ids its you !! | ![]() kooba | |
25/6/2024 17:14 | Anyone can pick one paragraph of one post taken out of context from a year before settlement and ignore the rest. It just goes to show how desperate they must be to maintain their credibility in the face of >90% votes for the board since. It must have taken hours to find that and no-one cares anyway. | ![]() terrorwit | |
25/6/2024 17:01 | NigWit 18 Feb '22 - 18:07 - 24073 of 39740None of this short-term trading matters though. It's all about the main event.I mean, what value would you put on a settlement of, say, ?750m, plus ?100m PA license fees and a supply contract with STM?... all of which could quite feasibly be just the beginning. " | ![]() kooba | |
25/6/2024 16:48 | The reply to koobas' post will be an interesting one. Any chance of addressing it nigwitty/nigwit/giga | ![]() chilom | |
25/6/2024 16:46 | Anyone can pick one paragraph of one post taken out of context from a year before settlement and ignore the rest. It just goes to show how desperate they must be to maintain their credibility in the face of >90% votes for the board since. It must have taken hours to find that and no-one cares anyway. | ![]() terrorwit | |
25/6/2024 14:40 | 𝐚𝐟 𝐈𝐭 𝐭𝐡 | ![]() coiin stein | |
25/6/2024 14:03 | “NigWit 18 Feb '22 - 18:07 - 24073 of 39740 None of this short-term trading matters though. It's all about the main event. I mean, what value would you put on a settlement of, say, £750m, plus £100m PA license fees and a supply contract with STM? ... all of which could quite feasibly be just the beginning. “ I did have a quick look at your posting history before you exited in a hissy fit in april 2022..thanks for the advice in looking into what you posted. | ![]() kooba | |
25/6/2024 10:59 | Good morning to you too. Any research into my posting history will only reveal that I have been proved right on Nanoco and that I was the only one who correctly understood and predicted not only the outcome of the Samsung case but the negative effect it would have on forum sentiment. It will also show that I only ever urge realism and sticking to the known facts and analysis. | ![]() terrorwit | |
25/6/2024 07:11 | TerrorWit - the font of misinformation, pompous, arrogant, foulmouthed Clown with his own agenda. Believe him at your peril. A little research will reveal exactly what sort of person he is. | ![]() jph | |
24/6/2024 23:17 | From the LSE BB. TwoGood2Die Posts: 2,759 Price: 19.50 No Opinion RE: Edison update Today 22:43 'While the value of the potential pay-out has not been disclosed, in our May update we calculated that the lost revenue in the US attributable to the patent infringement to date could be in the region of US$200–250m. Any damages award could also make an additional allowance for sales in other territories and for future sales of Samsung TVs using quantum dots.' | ![]() paul planet earth1 | |
24/6/2024 12:56 | I wonder if the buyback has restarted? | ![]() supernumerary | |
24/6/2024 10:57 | More paid for promotion? | ![]() pdwop | |
24/6/2024 10:32 | I'm sorry but when has Edison been accurate about anything? | ![]() chilom | |
24/6/2024 10:22 | "Valuation: Asymmetric risk, skewed to the upside In our view, Nanoco’s EV of £15m undervalues the company’s expertise, IP, facilities and customer relationships, as well as its earnings and cash flow potential. Delivery to either our mid- or bull-case scenarios should deliver significant upside. Applying an achievable 10x EV/EBITDA rating to our FY27 mid-case scenario returns a valuation of 46p, and 152p in our bull case. The company’s IP, expertise, balance sheet and low-cost run rate should help provide downside protection." | ![]() terrorwit | |
22/6/2024 09:15 | You won't be here next Tuesday! | ![]() bones699 | |
21/6/2024 19:35 | 𝐛𝐚 𝐈 𝐢𝐦 𝐡𝐨 𝐇𝐚 | ![]() coiin stein |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions