Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[terrorwit] 19/5/2024 08:12

The difference between you and me is that I've fought commercial litigations so I know and you don't.

If the company hadn't taken the offer it would most likely no longer exist. Certainly, it wasn't worth taking the risk of trial and if it had done and if it had then not won as much as Samusung's offer it would have been liable for all the legal costs from the time of the offer.

The problem here is that people got a romantic notion of some massive, unprecedented David v Goliath battle in their heads instead of listening to wiser people and they can't drop it even now. In truth the dispute could have been lost altogether.

[millwallfan] 18/5/2024 22:43

TW. I feel you are being somewhat disingenuous - as a small PI my feelings are very much in line with PPE. There is quite a degree of documented evidence from the company and others ( including the Markman outcome and detail of Samsung worldwide sales profits) that the Samsung settlement should have been significantly higher than the settlement. So to state ‘none of that is true’ is in itself completely inaccurate!

[paul planet earth1] 18/5/2024 06:41

From the LSE BB

TwoGood2Die

Posts: 2,527

Price: 17.80

No Opinion

A question of integrity!

Today 06:36

"Successful businesses build positive relations with all their investors, treating them all fairly, and providing accurate and timely updates on commercial progress.

With Nanoco we have a CEO who lacks both a scientific background, doesn't have relevant qd industry experience, nor is a well respected industry leading figure...This must to an extent put off would be customers....

We also have the Samsung debacle, a poor financial return, way below what the company had been alluding to through it own broadcasts and through using third parties such as Edison, and reflected at the time through leading financial papers.

We then have the integrity issue, firstly all the misleading guidance leading up to the settlement and the shenigans behind closed doors with the likes of both LOAM and RG who dumped their shares while retail investors were being fed inaccurate and untrue information....

We then have the financial outcome way below industry experts analysis...add to that the unwarranted sale of 118 patents without I might add share holder prior approval...

What's infuriating for many is not having a vote on the Samsung deal and knowing what exactly was being given away...

We are now just treading water, the share price is drifting back down to the 12p cash price, and the market has lost all faith in the Board, while Nanoco is not seen anymore as an exciting high tech potentially global leading business but more of a drab, dull, poorly managed firm, drifting along, with a Board completely out of touch and ignorant to the concerns of its multitude of retail investors who the CEO liberally and arrogantly refers in a derogatory manner as 'speculative gamblers'.

Think this sums up BT's performance 5 years into the job....In my view he should have stepped down shortly after the shambolic Samsung settlement deal was signed....IMHO!"

[terrorwit] 17/5/2024 12:42

What are "the prints" and why should genuine investors care about them?

I can only see £12k worth of transactions for the whole morning so far. They're totally irrelevant to anyone with an attention span longer than a gnat's fart.

[kooba] 17/5/2024 09:58

No sellers around after the tender they said..just looking at the prints..

[terrorwit] 16/5/2024 11:46

Medical stocks are extremely risky. Their whole model relies on complex, expensive drug approvals so they fail very fast and when least expected. I wouldn't go near any myself.

Anyway, buying one stock shouldn't stop you buying another too so I'm not sure why you keep mentioning it.

[bones698] 16/5/2024 10:56

And to think you could have bought agl cheaper and now look at it oh dear. Same old nano stuck in the past and going nowhere.. Such a shame propel don't listen on these boards.

[terrorwit] 16/5/2024 08:57

So you're saying that they're going to drop to 12p but we should keep them anyway based on what you say on the other forum using a different pseudonym?

You must be the thickest dullard on the internet.

[paul planet earth1] 16/5/2024 08:35

12p on the horizon BT did a pretty good job of destroying share holder value and referring to retail investors as speculative traders doesn't help things...TG2D on the LSE BB sums up things nicely...put the shares in the bottom draw and forget about them for the next six months!

[terrorwit] 16/5/2024 08:18

What example? All you did was tenuously refer to another stock to try and draw a parallel where none exists.

The simplistic idea that stocks are valued on their cash doesn't conform to any precedents and is nonsensical.

[supernumerary] 15/5/2024 20:51

lol - example given, story changed

[terrorwit] 15/5/2024 20:02

So it's not valued on its cash but on its prospects. Same as every other share.

When you cut through all shares are valued on jam tomorrow.

[supernumerary] 15/5/2024 19:54

Posters on MHC reckon it's got £8m in the bank and a market cap of under £5M... Perhaps you could go and sort them out?

[terrorwit] 15/5/2024 19:09

Why? Name a single company that's valued only on its cash.

[beeezzz] 15/5/2024 17:29

With £23m in the bank share price should slowly reach that valuation...nothing else driving share price

[terrorwit] 15/5/2024 14:09

... Calling people "fatty"

How old are you? Three?

[terrorwit] 15/5/2024 11:41

Moronic both.

You've no business here or anywhere else on the market

[jph] 15/5/2024 10:52

Clown.Who lost money?Not me.Who spends their life trying to impose their opinion on others?Not me.Who is foul mouthed?Not me.Grow up.

[terrorwit] 15/5/2024 08:16

I'm sorry if you lost money but on the stock market there's no one to blame but yourself so you need to grow up if you're going to continue to participate.

[jph] 15/5/2024 01:33

Clown.Emphasising 18p Wow.

[terrorwit] 14/5/2024 13:29

Emphasising

Dr Jalal Bagherli

Co-Chair

[terrorwit] 14/5/2024 13:29

Dr Jalal Bagherli

Co-Chair

Dr Jalal Bagherli brings broad experience of working with a number of the world’s largest brands in the electronics industry. Jalal was recently appointed Co-Chair of the UK Semiconductor Advisory Panel, representing the views of the UK semiconductor industry. He was the CEO of Dialog Semiconductor plc (“Dialog”;) from 2005 until the successful sale of the company to Japan’s Renasas in 2021. Under Jalal’s leadership, Dialog became a world leader in mobile power management and connectivity products, selling to most of the major companies in the consumer electronics and mobile phone sector. His earlier career included roles as CEO of Alphamosaic and before that at Sony Semiconductor and Devices Europe as Vice President and Managing Director.

[terrorwit] 14/5/2024 13:27

Dieter May

Non-executive Director

Dieter was appointed to the Board in February 2024.

Skills and experience

Dieter was Chairman and CEO of Osram Opto Semiconductors GmbH, one of the world’s leading optoelectronic components companies, participating in electronics applications such as facial and iris recognition, health monitoring, vehicle navigation, and virtual and augmented reality as well as uLED displays. As CEO, Dieter developed relationships with leading companies throughout the sector. His earlier career spanned Senior Vice President positions in semiconductor technologies (Infineon), and connected devices and digital consumer services in both mobile consumer products (Nokia) and automotive (BMW).