We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.30 | 11.58 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0548 | 2.10 | 23.32M |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
08:42:50 | O | 17,379 | 11.508 | GBX |
Date | Time | Source | Headline |
---|---|---|---|
20/11/2024 | 12:40 | ALNC | Nanoco Group unveils restructuring plan amid profit decline |
20/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Preliminary Results |
15/11/2024 | 11:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Posting of Circular and Notice of General Meeting |
30/10/2024 | 07:01 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Completion of Buyback Programme |
30/10/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Transaction in Own Shares and Total Voting Rights |
29/10/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Transaction in Own Shares and Total Voting Rights |
28/10/2024 | 12:43 | ALNC | IN BRIEF: Nanoco shareholder wants to put two of its people on board |
28/10/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Receipt of General Meeting Requisition Notice |
26/10/2024 | 12:48 | ALNC | EXECUTIVE CHANGES: New Scancell, Nanoco and LPA CEOs; Coral CEO exits |
23/10/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Nanoco Group PLC Transaction in Own Shares and Total Voting Rights |
Nanoco (NANO) Share Charts1 Year Nanoco Chart |
|
1 Month Nanoco Chart |
Intraday Nanoco Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
20/11/2024 | 10:45 | Nanoco/Dow - 2016 a transformational year for CFQD | 40,341 |
11/7/2024 | 17:00 | Nanoco Technologies Ltd | 115 |
18/3/2024 | 15:19 | fum value | - |
25/7/2023 | 14:36 | Nanoco - Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots - World Leader | 15,688 |
28/3/2023 | 19:17 | Directors/officers who went to jail | - |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
08:42:52 | 11.51 | 17,379 | 1,999.98 | O |
08:21:28 | 11.51 | 4,756 | 547.32 | O |
08:19:51 | 11.96 | 40 | 4.78 | O |
2024-11-20 17:05:22 | 11.52 | 450,000 | 51,840.00 | O |
2024-11-20 16:34:39 | 11.46 | 450,000 | 51,574.95 | O |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 21/11/2024 08:20 by Nanoco Daily Update Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 11.52p.Nanoco currently has 202,388,487 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £23,315,154. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 2.10. This morning NANO shares opened at - |
Posted at 29/10/2024 15:25 by kooba They are also stake building in TENT"Milkwood Capital has built a stake in the winding-down Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT) as it makes a second attempt at obtaining an investment company to run.The Windsor-based activist investor has established a 14.9% position in the £85m trust since it started buying shares in late August, stock exchange filings show, in a move similar to its failed attempt to prevent the wind-down of Downing Strategic Micro-Cap (DSM) earlier this year."Sept 24There was some performance data given in the DSM tilt."Big performance claimIn a letter to DSM's board earlier this year, he claimed the UK assets of Milkwood Fund had generated a 137% return in the three years to the end of 2023, beating all existing micro-cap funds, including 83.1% from Rockwood and 0.7% from DSM.He said Milkwood would not a charge a management fee until it had restored DSM shareholders' losses by returning the share price to 100p."I would be interested in holding a listed fund that gave that performance !! |
Posted at 28/10/2024 07:07 by bones698 Lol infighting and power struggles . Now an attempt to turn it into a cash shell and get kick out the current board . Always said this was ran by charlatan's. Unable to create a viable business seeking dots nobody wants especially from nano . Going to meet a messy end soon share price likely to head back to 10p with all the politics involved and trying to get rid of the current bod that have done nothing |
Posted at 03/10/2024 06:29 by paul planet earth1 Agree that RNS is contradictory they should drop the tag line of leading manufacturer as Nanoco are manufacturing nothing.The biggest failing of the Board was getting into bed with bad company and dodgey dealings with LOAM and RG who clearly given their track record didn't give a fig about Nanoco's future and instead pursued an ongoing licence agreement with Samsung which would have secured its future and funded organic growth given that product delivery can take years and looking at ST Micro outcome runs high risks of failure. The nonsense about other companies using their IP to date they haven't gone after anyone else even tbough they had the settlement funds from Samsung to do so another blatant lie. The sum of today's RNS a reflection on very poor business management and commercial judgement and a lack of integrity in the Boards various undertakings leading to their cummuppance the business being sold off as the management team have failed to deliver anything.. As to continuing and even increasing the return of value that's just camouflage for syphoning off the remaining cash before the fire sale completion. The cash placement in 2022 was 42p current share price 12p so they can drop the nonsense regarding rewarding return of value as well they are an abject failure and the mgt teams treachery has come back with avengence to haunt them! |
Posted at 04/9/2024 05:21 by paul planet earth1 PWhite73"Sorry I don't see the black hole ahead you do. 99% of AIM/small cap companies would kill to swap places with NANO to have a cash balance of £19m and no debt." Nanoco has no customers and is burning through £7m cash a year with just £19m cash left...20 months cash runway at most..the development and roll out of new customer products can take years and there is a high risk that the unnamed Asian customer walks as well as GEN 2 materials requiring at least another 2 years until available.. What Nanoco should of done is mitigated this risk with ST Micro where if they wanted production to progress they shared that financial risk through a working capital and capex funding agreement until a point that manufacture reached an agreed volume and Nanoco repaid the loan and in the event that ST Micro were to cancel they would forfeit that loan.. Nanoco stupidity deployed all the funding itself with no contingency plans other than to cut costs which was very foolish and short sighted as ST Micro have now walked leaving Nanoco holding the baby. This clearly demonstrates BT and the Boards lack of commercial experience, poor business judgement, and amateur business strategy which is now shown to be inept and incompetent. No wonder he is leaving soon but not soon enough! |
Posted at 02/9/2024 10:27 by pwhite73 The fall is well overdone. The termination with the European partner will lead to a fall of revenue of 25% to year end July 2025 that's all. Revenues to July 2025 are expected to be £9.5m. The reduction in the number of shares is important for the payment of any dividends and the value of the company were it subject to a takeover.Yes there has been crass incompetence in the past and even that's a gross underestimation but the fall is well overdone given the cash pile and IP prospects. The share price is being manipulated down so the purchase of its own shares are cheaper. The share price will recover when the £3m buyback is complete, new management is announced and an update on the second generation sensing materials with their Asian partner. This is without the announcement of any new contracts. |
Posted at 30/8/2024 11:43 by sikhthetech The warnings were there, going back years....Yet again, another share pumped/dumped by Barky and his scaffolders gang crashes. It's not a coincidence, is it? Barky/PPE and blnx mob are simply trying to divert away from their pump/dump by blaming management. Shameful... I 1st appeared here 2 years ago, warning of the red flags. It's not a coincidence that bones698 and I were posting the red flags, Barky/PPE/Supern then appeared on AGL/TLY and desperately deramped them. Blnx down 90%, rthm down 80%, trmr down 80%, GBO bust, VRS down 99% etc etc... sikhthetech - 24 Jan 2024 - 14:59:05 - 38151 of 38678 Buybacks don't always work in increasing the share price Much better to have the cash and let PIs decide whether they wish to reinvest or use elsewhere. Buy backs can be stopped at any time. If the company publishes warnings, lack of sales, biggest shareholders selling etc, at any time then any potential gains from the buyback are wiped out and the share price could be lower than today. Buy backs here will be the worst outcome. Ask the blnx gang Barky/Gino/PPE etc etc. Trmr(ex blnx) have had buy backs for years. The share price still crashed from 850p to 150p, as I predicted, after repeated profit warnings. Same for Rthm. Losing 80% on trmr AND rthm AND Nano. |
Posted at 30/8/2024 09:30 by kemche All I am going to do is point out you're making the same mistake rochdae is, but from a different angle. First off, lose the childish refrain about the meaningfulness of 'speculating' on forums. Its such a monumental self-own, it is truly beyond mockery. Second, [READ THE FOLLOWING VERY, VERY CAREFULLY. WHAT'S COMING IS AN AREA YOU CONSTANTLY FAIL TO UNDERSTAND]: The fundamentals - and the debate over them - of the business and management's guidance regarding them - are NOT the only major factors at play here and NOT if fact what I am commenting on at all. The other crucial pillar is the share price itself, what kind of value it represents, what it is discounting and what it isn't, and how are major buyers and sellers positioned in the market at present. It's the latter that provides the context of everything frankly, and it clearly needs repeating here: the operating business in NANO is currently valued at less than nothing in the market and that alters EVERYTHING when you are discussing the company. In short, the bar is now so low that an announcement about a change of address or hiring a new PR company might cause the share price to rally 10%. I'm mainly joking, but only just. NANO's share price is at level that it is almost a bit of touchpaper now, where just about any good news could ignite it. |
Posted at 06/8/2024 18:38 by andycapped The actions of the company prior to 2019 crash in share price was one where they thought they'd never run out of money.They were blowing through around £12m a year back then, with no firm contracts. We'll see, but the timing of BTs departure does not suggest a move to greener pastures. Share price is rock bottom, and has everything to do with the 2nd July RNS, which may have been the last straw for his tenure. |
Posted at 24/4/2024 16:04 by sikhthetech I see the same messing has continued.Majority of the time, buy backs don't work. They benefit the BoD more than PIs. As said before, far better to pay a special divi and let PIs decide what they want to do with their own money. sikhthetech24 Jan '24 - 14:59 - 38151 of 39419 Edit 0 3 1 Buybacks don't always work in increasing the share price Much better to have the cash and let PIs decide whether they wish to reinvest or use elsewhere. Buy backs can be stopped at any time. If the company publishes warnings, lack of sales, biggest shareholders selling etc, at any time then any potential gains from the buyback are wiped out and the share price could be lower than today. Buy backs here will be the worst outcome. Ask the blnx gang Barky/Gino/PPE etc etc. Trmr(ex blnx) have had buy backs for years. The share price still crashed from 850p to 150p, as I predicted, after repeated profit warnings. Same for Rthm. Losing 80% on trmr AND rthm AND Nano. |
Posted at 11/4/2024 15:27 by twatcher "The Capital Reduction will facilitate the previously announced return of capital to Shareholders of between GBP33 million and GBP40 million (or approximately 10 pence to 12 pence per share) using the second tranche of the proceeds of the Samsung litigation ($75 million) which is expected to be received during February 2024. No decision has yet been taken as to the method of any such return of capital."As someone else asked earlier, how is giving the company a share worth 21-22p in return for 24p, returning 10-12p per share back to shareholders ?, and then it is only some shares, not all. Not only is a participate getting only 2-3p per share for part of their holding, they are also surrending that part of their holding. So when all the dust is settled, if the share price drops as a result of the corporate action, then everyone, including those that participated will be worse off overall, and if by some magic the share price increases, those that participated will be worse off compare to those that did not (because they have less shares) Scratches head. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions