Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.50 -1.93% 25.40 387,846 16:35:03
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
25.40 25.60 26.50 24.70 26.50
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Technology Hardware & Equipment 3.86 -5.96 -1.76 78
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
17:00:54 O 120,680 25.9422 GBX

Nanoco (NANO) Latest News

More Nanoco News
Nanoco Investors    Nanoco Takeover Rumours

Nanoco (NANO) Discussions and Chat

Nanoco Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
11/6/202118:52Nanoco/Dow - 2016 a transformational year for CFQD23,588
08/11/201916:59value of Nanoco5
05/11/201909:20sp will rise3
30/10/201907:53Apple won patents covering quantum dots display-
23/10/201914:22two big buy positions7

Add a New Thread

Nanoco (NANO) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
17:00:5525.94120,68031,307.05O
15:35:0325.4013,2813,373.37UT
15:09:4125.001,000250.00O
14:45:1925.0050,00012,500.00O
13:52:0425.0110,0002,501.42O
View all Nanoco trades in real-time

Nanoco (NANO) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
14/6/2021
09:20
Nanoco Daily Update: Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Technology Hardware & Equipment sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 25.90p.
Nanoco Group Plc has a 4 week average price of 21.80p and a 12 week average price of 20p.
The 1 year high share price is 30.40p while the 1 year low share price is currently 8.20p.
There are currently 305,686,880 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 200,927 shares. The market capitalisation of Nanoco Group Plc is £77,644,467.52.
22/5/2021
09:25
spastics attack: An IPA should not come as any surprise and an attempt to delay the October hearing can simply be rejected by the judge that such a request is groundless and a time delaying tactic. Samsung's position is simply to drag the process out and attempt to minimise the financial damages by watering down the claims. I see nothing new hear nor do I see the pending court case in October being delayed..The reference of 'up to 12 mths for IPA to conclude' has been taken out of context..This does not mean a minimum of 12 mths. The court case in October followed by judgement which will typically fall into February 2022 would imply a 9 mth period of time for the IPA to be concluded..all very doable in my opinion. By which time STM contract would no doubt be proceeding to delivery as expected H2 22. In terms of funding this is an absolute no brainer institutional investors could easily support a further rights issue if needed, or STM through accelerated revenues under contract, or by litigation funding..There are no issues here..the only issue is time and patience.12 months from now I'm sure Nanoco Group will have a much more brighter and certain future if not sooner with a licence deal from Samsung, the icing on the cake equivalent to £80m post tax cashflow with other new contracts in the pipeline, STM etc, a strong order book and being a key player in the burgeoning QD market as many of the segments, sensing, display, medical, horticultural are growing rapidly. Based on a cost of capital 8.5% the share price will no doubt rise considerably to easily north side of 200p+ without adding in the special dividend awarded under a Samsung settlement. My expectation is that June next year we will cross the Rubican. The only trade off would be the size of settlement versus the licence fees agreement. A smaller settlement figure versus a higher licence fee per unit sold and extended terms using Nanoco CFQD technology. At the end of the day this is just business and Samsung has a track record and a well trodden path in these outcomes. The current situation should come as no shock and this is reflected in the small dip in share price reducing some of the buoyant froth that some quarters had anticipated from an earlier than expected settlement outcome.
20/5/2021
09:30
nigwit: The legal process and expectations haven't changed. It was always going to be a marathon. Today's RNS has not changed the share price beyond the normal fluctuation we might expect on any other day. Just the same as with the Markman RNS announcement it was only a forum-driven, closed-loop dream that it would do anything else. Unless there's a surprise negotiated settlement, Nanoco is still years away from the litigation coming to an end, just as it was the case yesterday and last month. It's good to watch the signal and filter the noise. I like that contracts are building whilst we wait for the arrival of the potentially very large slow train coming down the Texan tracks.
12/5/2021
20:37
millwallfan: The share price peaked in 2013 around £1.80 which would have reflected the value belief of the patents and anticipated commercialisation. IMHO I cannot see a return to such dizzy heights given the genuine competition have had 8 years to continue their R&D which potentially erodes our competitive advantage all those years ago in securing long term contracts. I think assuming we win in court the best we can hope for now is a large lump sum award giving financial security plus the opportunity for a special dividend to reward LTH’s together with future sales contracts. I would guess many holders would in fact be happy for either a takeover at £1 or a share price thereof giving the chance to exit if required. Of course only time will tell how this will pan out but I am reluctantly resigned to a likely several year wait as much as I would welcome a ‘reasonable217; early settlement. Just my views
29/3/2021
07:50
barkboo: You draw your own conclusions - but when NANO come out with, "Our lawsuit against Samsung for the alleged wilful infringement of Nanoco's IP is progressing well" you know there is a certain amount of excitement involved. The share price open should tell us how well the case is progressing - a 50% rise today is the sort of move I am hoping for...that is the guide to how well the hearing went. Good luck holders.
10/2/2021
17:59
jfacwc: As per Nanoco.How does this all fit with your statements?Are these wild valuations?Complaint alleges Samsung wilfully infringed Nanoco's core intellectual property? Five patents cited – relating to Nanoco's unique QD synthesis and resin capabilities? Infringing products are Samsung's range of quantum dot enabled TVs? Samsung estimated to have sold 14 million TVs using Nanoco technology? Case currently focuses on US (largest market), but can extend to other major markets? Substantial third party litigation funding in place in return for share of any winnings (no cost risk to Nanoco if the case is unsuccessful)? Nanoco believe damages should reflect a share of the value created by our technology? Any damages should consider past and future value creation? In most successful outcome scenarios, Nanoco retains over half of any monetary damages after Counsel and Funder fees – increases to three quarters at higher values
29/1/2021
17:52
nigwit: "I think we should all enjoy the nano share price going up in January & February, as it likes to do most years" Except for the 21 Feb peak last year that's not what the five year chart shows. It's been all over the place and is obviously not correlated with anyone's tax bills. It's easy to check these things before writing misleading nonsense.
29/1/2021
16:14
jfacwc: I think we should all enjoy the nano share price going up in January & February, as it likes to do most years, not always on any particular news. Last years reason was putting itself up for sale.The share price generally realigns itself by March, alarmingly sometimes.Isnt it about this time of year ME has to pay his Tax Bills?
20/1/2021
14:38
barkboo: Millwallfan - it is merely a guess, so lets talk hypothetical. If Samsung thought they were likely to loose the case, which they are....they are playing away as well, they would be looking for an out of Court settlement. Lawyers would be looking for telephone numbers...no foal no fee, and ongoing patent value. This would suggest Samsung will probably be shrewd enough to buy NANO, reduce legal costs of the case - and collect the technology for life..with no back payments? Now there is one other move they can make - a win case would value NANO at a minimum of £1, and probably a lot more...If Samsung kept the NANO share price down before the offer.....I'll let you finish the jigsaw. Just a guess - but they do have history of duck&dive.
20/1/2021
13:01
botbot1202: ok, Serious question, have no true idea of the answer. ASSUMPTION....... Let's just say (using a number, for the sake of this calculation only) that Samsung pay Nano £305m, and that's what Nano gets after any fee's etc.etc. So now Nano goes down to it's local Natwest Bank and pays in the cheque, and it clears.!... So now Nano have an extra £305m in it's bank.... What happens to the Share Price/How does that effect/reflect onto the Investors.? Samsung paying Nano an equivalent of £1 a share in damages, would that mean that the share price would go up by £1.00 ? Would Nano need to do a special dividend.? or would it purely be that the market would look at this, and maybe say ok, Nano's got an extra £350m, so now we'll increase the share price to 75p or something.? If anyone actually knows/have seen this before, an answer would be appreciated. DISCLAIMER......ALL NUMBERS USED ARE NO REFLECTION OF MY BELIEF THAT THESE ARE TRULY THE END RESULT OF ANY SETTLEMENT. THEY ARE PURELY FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY.!
29/12/2020
18:05
millwallfan: IMHO all nano need to do is keep their head above water through tight control of costs and small but important levels of ongoing income. The lawsuit is fully funded so no risk to agl and is like a dripping tap with the ‘washer’ slowly deteriorating letting the drips turn to a dribble then a steady flow etc. The mega experienced law firm would not have taken this on at 50-50 or indeed 65-35 so the 80% confidence being touted is probably reasonable plus or minus 5. As the ‘flow’ gets stronger the pressure on Samsung ramps up either to settle out of court or make a pre-emptive bid, probably at about halfway between the then share price and the indicative share price with a successful court decision and related sums due in terms of lost licence fees, damages and costs - which would be significant if we ever get to the end game. However, if the case is lost the share price would likely not be worth much more than the paper of the share certificate. Happy new year all !
Nanoco share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
NANO
Nanoco
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20210614 18:43:55