We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoco Group Plc | NANO | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.28 | -1.79% | 15.36 | 16:35:27 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.00 | 15.50 | 16.00 | 15.36 | 15.64 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE & EQUIPMENT |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 25/7/2024 18:33 by sikhthetech Barky"I have never tried to persuade buyers….always wanted the best price for myself and family" Exactly, you and mates. Pump/dump so you and your family can live in nice houses, holidays etc.. Given majority of your shares crash, your family obviously not happy with you. Blnx down 90%, Nano down 70%,VRS down 99%, rthm down 80% Your posts. You and your mates with 6 figures couldn't careless who you fleece so as long you are ok. Your posts: BARKBOO - 30 Oct 2012 - 09:25:38 - 23685 of 27952 Listen - I make on average 500-600 bets a day on horse racing indexes, a lot more on big meeting days. I know how to achieve an edge, I vary rarely lose! If that edge climbed to several 100% profit every day as opposed to several %, the betting patterns would show up, and the foul play finger could be pointed straight at me, I would pay the price! THE GANG WITH THEIR MULTIPLE IDS CAN CONTINUE TO LIVE IN NICE HOUSES. BARKBOO29 Jan '20 - 14:25 - 1007 of 1007 With today's news - I have a whole gang of friends with six figures waiting to attack a moody Tosca low volume sting back.... BARKBOO - 01 Nov 2018 - 07:02:48 - 7292 of 7798 "The family manage to have nice houses, cars, holidays and social lives - we have had two or three big pay days here, with the fourth on its way - it sounds to me like you traded your pot like the others on here..and like the rags, you done a bit of swirling! |
Posted at 25/7/2024 11:56 by barkbooo “BARKBOOO - 09 Jun 2024 - 15:10:20 - 39709 of 40032 Nanoco/Dow - 2016 a transformational year for CFQD - NANOThe market is correct - they value management at zero….that is spot on! I told this thread BT would not pay the one-off special divi he promised…spo Finally - the company will not make the same mistake again! Still not sold a single share - this needs a good leader!” |
Posted at 02/7/2024 10:09 by twatcher you need to read exactly what was written"Following customer dialogue, the Group no longer expects to receive a further production order for its validated first generation sensing products during FY24. The Group is working with its customer to understand the range of possible outcomes and any potential impact on Nanoco beyond the end of the financial year. The Group expects to issue a further update with the full year results in October. The Group continues with some small-scale commercial engagements for customers interested in display materials, although no new anchor customer has been signed at this time." 1) NANO expected an order during FY24, it no longer expects the order. What it doesn't say or imply is that the order has been pushed back or delayed. The existing order isn't happening when they thought it would and they do not feel they can say that it WILL be happening. 2) "no NEW anchor customer". That is suggestive to me that at this time they no longer consider STM an anchor customer. Otherwise surely it would have said "no additional anchor customer" |
Posted at 02/7/2024 08:29 by paul planet earth1 The market never lies!Nanoco Group PLC LON: NANO OverviewCompareFinan 13.66 GBX −6.12 (30.94%)today 2 Jul, 08:10 BST • Disclaimer |
Posted at 19/3/2024 18:45 by kooba They have “got involved” because they are a paid financial advisor and broker to the company announced 22 Dec 2023 and are expected to produce some coverage..part of the package.22 December 2023 NANOCO GROUP PLC ("Nanoco", the "Group", or the "Company") Appointment of Financial Adviser and Joint Broker Nanoco Group plc (LSE: NANO), is pleased to announce the appointment of Cavendish Capital Markets Limited as the Company's Financial Adviser and joint Corporate Broker. Note.. Disclaimer This communication is NON-INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND A MARKETING COMMUNICATION under the FCA's Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) and is issued in the UK by Cavendish, the trading name for the business operated by Cavendish Capital Markets Limited and Cavendish Securities plc, both of which are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)| and are members of the London Stock Exchange. In terms of the share price I imagine there is some short term arbitrage buying that will tender 100% to try and lose half the holding at 24p then hope to sell the balance close to 20p..I think they will need to be lucky to make that much of a turn. |
Posted at 12/3/2024 07:07 by paul planet earth1 From the LSE BB the share buyback looks set for failure!TwoGood2Die Posts: 1,871 Price: 20.275 No Opinion RE: Share BuybackToday 07:01 Troublesome "If you look at the current spread 24p versus ask price 21p or 10% to 12% that's little incentive for investors to sell up! I would say the proposed share buyback has already failed regardless of the vote which will simply be a formality ie same 37% pushing it through but hardly any uptake as investors are not forced or induced to sell" TwoGood2Die Posts: 1,871 Price: 20.275 No Opinion RE: Share BuybackToday 06:45 Just to add... "My expectation is that the share buyback will fail to attract many sellers and a special dividend payment time for late June following the signing of the first commercial deal with STM seems the more likely outcome with the share buyback failing to achieve its original objectives reducing the share capital base and making Nanoco a more attractive takeover target" TwoGood2Die Posts: 1,871 Price: 20.275 No Opinion Share Buyback Today 06:42 "If you checked my original posts I cited that a share buyback was on the cards as part of a wider strategy and that was LOAM's future 'exit' strategy by reducing share capital making Nanoco a more enticing takeover target. At the time I suggested a £40m buy backbat 40p a share equating to 100m shares this would be priced above the 37p placement price in 2022 when the company needed operational funding. This I felt was a 'fair price' for the risks investors had faced and given that the share price itself had crashed 70% since the Feb 2023 Samsung settlement announcement was made on the $150m deal struck. It seems the Board have become too aggressive and priced the buyback at 24p having taken third party advice, which in my view the advice offered is fundamentally flawed as its always extremely important to take such matters into the context of the current situation and recent circumstances that Nanoco faced. A buyback at 24p if succesful plus a further £3m but with 90% of shares cancelled would at best lead to around 190m shares remaining in issue. 324m × 38.5% x 90% = 114.74m, post share price £33m/209m = 15.7p Note: 10% of shares won't be cancelled and still in effect counted as in issue. £3m spent on 'open market trading', £3m ÷ 15.7p = 19m x 90% = 17.9m. Total buyback = 114.74m + 17.9m = 132 64m 324m - 132.64m = 191m therefore £33m ÷ 191m implies a 'theoretical' share price of 17p where LOAM hopes Nanoco gets taken out at between 5 and 10x multiple or 85p minimum = 85p x 191m = £160m at 8.75% WACC = implied pre tax earnings = £14m but recent buyers have been using c.5% (or less) for a cash purchase implying earnings £8m which broadly will be inline with likely first Nanoco commercial deal at c.£12m recenues per year. The expectation is the Board believes investors will sell at 24p while current share price has risen 5% to 20p. My view the vote at the end of March will progress ( same 37% pushing it through, just a formality) however not many retail investors will sell and risk being 'out of the market' should positive news get released and then being unable to buy back in sub 24p... Ergo the 24p share buyback price is way too aggressively priced ie too low to induce many investors to sell up. And those that do sell were pribably inclined to anyway regardless of the price. Given the current share price and likely poor take up, evidenced by the number of frustrated posts here, I believe the take up will fall well short of 38.5% as there is no real financial incentive to do so as the buyback price is too low, and way below the 37p placement offer, to make it attractive enough! As always one to watch 'dodgey' LOAM RNS share holdings who would no doubt be buying up off loaded shares cheaply at 17p in the expectation of a future buy out by a third party. Again the Board have executed a poorly thought through plan with substandard third party advice who clearly wern't aware of the previous 37p" |
Posted at 01/3/2024 19:48 by pj84 "jfacwc28 Feb '24 - 09:20 - 38632 of 38666Poor argument to worry about share price drop. Rather have dividend and take chances. More choices. Can always buy more. The future prospects have not changed? Always so much gloom here." jfacwc28 I missed your post at the time but I would also rather get it all as a dividend so that I can choose what to do but that wasn't my argument I was just pointing out that all other things being equal even if the return is all by dividend Barkboo won't then get out unscathed as the share price is likely to drop by that amount as soon as it goes ex-div unless the market then rerates it up or down. My fear is a buyback which would allow LOAM a way to reduce it's holding and whilst in theory a buyback should be neutral or even positive there are numerous examples of it having no positive effect on the share price often with the share price falling. The delay doesn't make any sense as Nanoco was wall aware of all of the alternative's for returning funds to shareholders last year and I would be surprised if for once they favoured small shareholders who have or should have there shares in either a SIPP or ISA and should want a dividend. As I write this I am actually questioning why I continue to hold given that I have long ago lost any faith in what BT says. |
Posted at 15/2/2024 22:57 by rochdae TH would have been a disaster and the end of the company. The science team would have walked and without the people nano has little value. I recall his criticism of Nigel Pickett that he hadn't produced many patents in recent years, as if coming up with a world beating patent happens overnight.You can buy £100 of nano shares today and get £160 back by end of March at the latest. Any takers? Nano 22 years and still going. All of its original competitors in the QD sphere have gone bust. Only one left. And just about, given Samsung's theft. Qdot display is accelerating. The majority though use Qdot light, so just under RoHAS but still containing small amounts of cadmium. I think display could still come good. Some form of collaboration perhaps, though it's difficult to produce Samsung's offering. It's not all to do with the seeding process, Samsung have multiple patents and expertise underpinning their tech. Still some 10 years ahead of the competition imo. Nano's first generation SWIR dots is exciting. Probably in Vision pro. To break into the supply chain is incredibly difficult. You're talking about a new material. Happens very rarely. The problem with Nano and ME was that they thought it would happen overnight. Then the disaster with Marl and horticulture and the premise of the business setup. The ST micro tie up extremely positive. They have 200,000 customers. What they do with Nano's Qd's is impressive, too. I think the Asian customer is almost certainly Sony. Sales to Japan, plus Sony's expertise in SWIR Qdot sensors etc.. Roch |
Posted at 10/2/2024 22:41 by barkbooo Frank - “ Colin:So stick to the other thread....” he can’t, nobody reads it! The authors contribution: “BROWNSTONE22 Dz30700 .. welcome to the thread. Please read the guidelines in the header and post 79, regarding the poster kooba. Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 100 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 23 Jan 2024 10:11 1 BROWNSTONE22 warranty .. please read post 79 Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 79 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 29 Oct 2023 21:39 14 3 BROWNSTONE22 ð��&ld Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 77 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 29 Oct 2023 20:37 1 3 BROWNSTONE22 Take a 72 hour break and come back better. Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 75 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 29 Oct 2023 15:23 3 2 BROWNSTONE22 andycapped, post 73 as per header Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 39 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 11 Oct 2023 12:04 1 BROWNSTONE22 Shapes, have placed your link in header. Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 17 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 04 Sep 2023 07:33 1 BROWNSTONE22 Activmojo, post 36921 your link added above. ADVFN - PROBLEMS - Post 4080 HELP BROWNSTONE22 15 Jun 2023 13:31 BROWNSTONE22 ? Nanoco/Dow - 2016 a transformational year for CFQD - Post 34082 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 12 May 2023 11:55 BROWNSTONE22 andycapped moderated Nanoco Technologies Ltd - Post 14 NANO Nanoco Group Plc BROWNSTONE22 08 May 2023 09:18 4 1 BROWNSTONE22 Quantum Leaper” So sinister - Brownstone could be BT? |
Posted at 18/1/2024 15:59 by seball A summary for new investors:- In Jan23 won a settlement for patent infringement against Samsung, earning Nanoco pre-tax $90m ($15m from a first payment, $75m due early Feb). - 10-12pps will be returned to shareholders in March24, exact method TBC but likely in whole or part a special dividend and/or buyback - During Samsung litigation, Nanoco had core patents challenged, tested and upheld at PTAB, confirming validity of patents for Nanoco's volume QD seeding process. - Nanoco have deep partnerships with 2 global device component/chemical manufacturers partners (one is ST Micro, the other an Asian customer). Both of these have thousands customers. - Big opportunities are in QD Sensors and display. QD sensors have significant performance and safety benefits, independent reports forecast QD sensors to become mainstream. - Nanoco are uncovering and engaging with other possible patent infringers, which could result in additional settlements or licence partnerships. - Nanoco's competition (QD manufacturers) are not profitable and some may have infringed Nanoco's patents. Following Nanoco's patent validation, many will now struggle to raise additional PE funding, one (Nanosys) recently sold. - Nanoco have cash for 4-5 years (after return to shareholders) but will be cash positive from 2025, possibly sooner = no further dilution. - Many announcements suggest that Nanoco's QDs are in sensors in the Apple Vision Pro, would be a huge validation of their tech and result in a huge scaling revenue stream and increases likelihood of Nanoco's QDs getting into future iPhone models = massive. - Other than Samsung (accused of partnering with & stealing Nanoco's methods and knowhow, resulting in $150m settlement and validation of Nanoco's IP at PTAB), QD adoption in devices has not got going. This appears to now be changing, with actual STMicro sensors on sale using QDs. This should snowball significantly over coming months/years. - Recently strengthened board with two experienced advisors with extensive contacts and experience scaling & selling tech businesses. - Nanoco completing build of a device lab, to actually demonstrate tech to customers, instead of talking theoretically, which will de-risk and accelerate customer adoption. - Nanoco is pretty much valued at cash or less than cash, with no value priced in for the core and fully funded business, in the early stages of a new technology adoption across a very wide range of use cases, including sensing, display, lighting, solar panels, medical devices and more. - Directors are now buying - 16th Jan |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
