Nanoco Share Chat (NANO)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Nanoco	LSE:NANO	London	Ordinary Share	GB00B01JLR99	ORD 10P

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	+0.25p	+0.65%	38.75p	38.50p	39.00p	39.75p	38.25p	39.75p	224,914	16:35:00

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Technology Hardware & Equipment	0.5	-12.6	-4.5	-	92.31

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 29276 to 29297 of 29300 messages

Chat Pages: 1172 1171 1170 1169 1168 1167 1166 1165 1164 1163 1162 1161 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
23/7/2017 17:07	A contract in itself is no good to anyone. Yiu need sn agreement to sell a profitable product in significsnt quantities to sustain s commercisl enterprise. Funny enough, all those points were lacking in their entireity in Nano's 'contract' announcemount.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
23/7/2017 16:39	And the answer is, yes they can now they have contracts.	loldemort	Read Full Thread Reply
23/7/2017 13:49	Ernest Hives, once the head man at Rolls Royce, said 'If the Engineers are wrong, then we're all wrong'. I think that applies to today with any tech company producing something of worth, it's the product that will decide the fate of a company. Nanoco seem to have a good product, else it wouldn't be attracting the interest from so many companies. The question is can they deliver on commercialisation before they run out of capital.	andycapped	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 23:36	slip, you need help fella... The market can be a cruel place. Find your priorities in life and look after yourself...	kuss1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 21:07	I smell fear here from a certain poster,some news from DOW this week? Or a robust trading update in a few weeks?	syd7777	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 21:05	"Bragging is a sign of insecurity.."Bang on.	wigwammer	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:56	There is no lies kuss. The dmoke and mirrors are from the compsny. We will no who is right very soon. So sut tight.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:47	slippery, exactly... a trader. I don't mind that. It's part of the market. But why all the lies and the pretence. Is money that important to you? Anyway, back to Nano. I expect some significant news soon. Another contract, Merck factory build or Dow commercialisation orders. All imminent.	kuss1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:38	Kuss Just becsuse I short today doesnt mran I will when faced with fresh evidence or change of sentiment.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:20	slippery, OK fine. But that sums you up. You're a trader. You think you're smarter than the market. In and out, long and short. An opportunist. Good luck if you can do it year in year out. Probably lost your shirt index trading, or gold or some other nonsense. Seen it all before. Bragging is a sign of insecurity... you've been found out... And if you were holding PAYS, does that mean you were wrong to justify your short?	kuss1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:12	A rolling stone gathers no moss kuss.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:12	Read my posts on Pays over last 3 weeks you will see I was holding.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 20:11	Kuss I then bought bsck snd shortef with IG the day news of regs come snd closed out. Do yiu reslly think I stsnd still snd just except s loss. I am trading constantly. And what about when I tipped Safecharge and Worldpay months ago. They srent looking too bad are they. I got it wrong on GVC granted but I didnt say I was a genius.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 19:55	slippy, you lost a fortune on Plus as it plunged. I recall your bullish posts then it tanked. Then if I recall you became massively bearish, only to see plus rise to where it is now. IG you were shorting at £4 now £6! You were short on PAYS, just received an offer on Friday. A shocking record if you ask me... But you made money on Nano and can't leave it alone ... but you're going to get fried... As for Globo and Quindell, we were all short on those.. You can always spot the novices in this business. They come and go in the end. The market chews them up and spits them out. And with Nano you shouldn't be shorting a company with a near 20-year record of existence and excellence in the field.	kuss1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 19:45	And WW i made mega money on plus and IG Not to mention Globo, Quindell, Monetise, Bnn, Seeing Machines to nsme a few.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 19:20	Funny old comments from slippy.... thought this was going to 10p by Xmas 2015? Then 15p in a matter of months. Now if they can get a loan he might buy in! The management issue is an irrelevance to me. ME isn't great but he isn't a criminal as slippy suggests. It's the product that counts as I've posted many times. Remember Yell and all the great managers they employed? All came to nothing because the product was already history. Management is operational stuff, but with Nano it's the science. To say the Philip's deal is not important is nonsense. A first class OEM are buying nanoco's tech for their premier line of TV's and monitors. That validates the tech. It open's up the very real prospect of further orders. TCL and Hisense are next in line. I think there will be 3 major OEM's with Nano's tech in their flagship products come Xmas 2017. Dow have already said they have an operational large-scale plant in Korea with an existing cad free offering. That is major news. Nano expect a five fold increase in Dow production this year with confirmation of commercial orders imminent. Merck factory build is coming soon. They have no choice as the industry is accelerating. Merck used to dismiss Qdots but now they are fans because existing suppliers hate change being forced on them. Then they convert and champion the cause. 3M are out of the running, so are QD vision, so are Nanosys. Nanoco's main competitors are gone. Samsung has made a good fist of their cad free tech, but they don't own the IP and their components are semi carcinogenic. Hansol's scale up is not efficient and will eventually be phased out imo. As for the value of Nano's IP, you only have to look at what the Chinese were willing to pay for QD vision. Pretty much the market cap of Nanoco. And that was for a defunct technology. Really just for a few patents in fact. You really have to take an industry perspective which is often lacking on this board. Have some respect for the decisions of major players such as Dow, Merck and Wah Hong. They know their business. They know what's coming. Nano have made errors though. Mainly over-estimating the disruptive potential of Qdots. There is massive inertia in the industries they targeted. Because industry doesn't like change, a bit like Yell. But those companies in the end have to come into line. Look how BASF are now pro cadmium free products. They've had to change, just like Merck have done. Nano now of the verge of a transformation. The share price will follow.	kuss1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 19:04	As you will one day learn. You cant win em all	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 19:04	Not going too well but after 3 yesrs of repeatedly shorting Nsnoco I have enough to retire on.	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 18:59	Yes, yet you are incapable of answering a simple question about valuation. "Hey slip, how's your short going in PAYS and GVC... never mind IG and PLUS. Must have lost your shirt with those."Not always so lucky, it seems.	wigwammer	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 18:01	Yes, there are so many obvious parallels with NANO.I guess in the absence of an intelligent line of argument, then arbitrary scaremongering will have to do. Best wishes now.	wigwammer	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 17:30	Made a few bob on an investment WW. Feeling bullish. Go for it time eh? Talking of Edison, why not look at the Fusionex notes in the run-up to the share price collapse and the managment taking it private snd shafting holders. Hmmmm come to think of it.........	slipperysidewinder	Read Full Thread Reply
22/7/2017 17:21	Yawn.Interesting running through the 1H16 posts on the IQE site, just before it 5 bagged. Particularly relevant to NANO given the background in material technology and that both investments have been a long haul. Typically - those who lost out and sold focused on a perception of weak management (I doubt many concur with that view now). Those that won focused on valuing the assets and technology. Below is a typical bear post... management giving "the same excuses", they "don't understand the market", "wittering on" about being a growth company, the "top table" are looking after themselves, its "jam tomorrow" etc. Don't let BS like this stand in the way of a decent investment. swiss paul - 22 Mar 2016 - 21:23 - 28100 of 29598 - 0Help a poor boy out here: The growth in revenue was partially tempered by the widely reported weakness in the smartphone market, which was exacerbated by inventory adjustments - was that not the same excuse they used previously - can they not understand how a market operates. In the event that it reached 30 p - I will have my Stetson roasted with a slice of humble pie - quite large for afters. They have been wittering on for ages now about being a growth co - growth for who? Yep Dr Drew and those on the top table who will award themselves a shed load of options.Yet another day of jam tomorrow.	wigwammer	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 1172 1171 1170 1169 1168 1167 1166 1165 1164 1163 1162 1161 Older