ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

22.50
-0.90 (-3.85%)
Last Updated: 08:12:11
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.90 -3.85% 22.50 22.85 23.95 22.50 22.50 22.50 73,526 08:12:11
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 6.56 72.76M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 23.40p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 23.40p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £72.76 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.56.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 54851 to 54870 of 54875 messages
Chat Pages: 2195  2194  2193  2192  2191  2190  2189  2188  2187  2186  2185  2184  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
14/4/2024
16:06
No not genuine but I sincerely believe you are thick if that helps!
paul planet earth1
14/4/2024
15:54
Do you have genuine cognitive impairments or do you just act thick?
terrorwit
14/4/2024
13:43
Sorry I missed adding 'habitual compulsive liar' Terror Tit!
paul planet earth1
14/4/2024
10:00
Kooba


You write unremitting, toxic, hate-filled rants day in and out and have been demonstrably wrong on all the major points since you started. Your posts are nothing but a manifestation of your own imagination and ego.

You have ruined all decent discourse.

No-one with any sense is listening to you or any or your pathetic acolytes. Sound contributors just give up when faced with your intimidation and bullying. You claim to be in favour of free speech. You aren't, you insist on shutting down anyone who doesn't share your distorted worldview.

-------

Nanoco is a rare example of a successful university tech spin off. It consists of about fifty hard-working expert people operating from simple premises on a small industrial estate in Cheshire. The very idea that any of them are so-called "bad actors" is nonsensical.

--------

The public announcements Nanoco provide do not benefit from your constant over-thinking analysis and conspiracy thinking.

Please leave Nanoco alone and leave all the other hundreds, possibly thousands of content small shareholders alone too.

We do not need nor want you.

-------

I do not post on any other Nanoco forum or use any other names or aliases. Anyone else saying the same or similar to me is just another fed up shareholder who desires a better dialogue with others.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
22:51
"𝑲𝒐𝒐𝒃19938; - 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆 9938;𝒓ү40;𝒉 𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒙𝒄𝒆 9949;𝒍ү42;𝒏𝒕;, 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒍𝒘𝒂 9962;𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒈𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒂 9951;𝒄ү42;𝒅 𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘, 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆 9955;𝒔ү57;𝒂𝒏;𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒄 9948; 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒂 9944;𝒆ү50;𝒆𝒏;𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒗𝒆 9955; 𝒂𝒃𝒖𝒔 9946;𝒗ү42;"
.........................................................

𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐭 9841;𝐞Ү51; 𝐬𝐪𝐮𝐞 9838;𝐳Ү38; 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐮𝐛𝐞 𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐊 9832; 𝐚𝐧𝐝 .... 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮'𝐥19845; 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐚 9853;𝐲 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐰 9847; 𝐧𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐭 9841;𝐞Ү51; 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐮𝐩 𝐬𝐤𝐨𝐨 9835;𝐲'w852; 𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐞
..........

It's almost as if the self obsessed 𝐠𝐨𝐛𝐬 9841;𝐢Ү53;𝐞 skooby, wrote that post herself.
but NO ... that's not possible innit ?
BARKOOBA is a completely different username ..

coiin stein
12/4/2024
19:11
I have enjoyed your humiliation on LSE today Kooba.

You're a self-righteous loudmouth who's always full of opinion and all of it wrong - and now picking me up on a trivial point even though the substance of my point was entirely correct.

I hope no-one was freaked by your post-tender valuations of 17p and sold out hoping they could buy back in cheaper since it's fast looking like that might have been a very expensive mistake.

Time for you to apologise I think.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
17:57
Think folk should really check their information before posting!
..the highest shall be the higher of i) an amount equal to 105 per cent. of the average of the market value for an Ordinary Share as derived from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five Trading Days immediately preceding the day on which that Ordinary Share is purchased; and ii) an amount equal to the higher of the price of the last independent trade of an Ordinary Share and the highest current independent bid for an Ordinary Share on the London Stock Exchange at the time the purchase is carried out.



So “10% above the most recent independent purchase price” is simply not true, in fact if they are unable to pay more than 5% premium over 5 day official list average they will likely not be able to pay these levels even. These figures are set just so companies can’t chase their own tails driving a price up “indefinitely” ffs!
You are so dismissive of others yet can’t read the documents.

kooba
12/4/2024
17:38
Love to hear MORBOX views.
arsenal1948
12/4/2024
16:52
This is because the company has our agreement to buy back shares at prices up to 5% above the most recent independent purchase price. Consequently, the price will rise to at least 24p because no-one will want to sell at less (otherwise they would have taken the tender offer).

In my view it's likely to go on an upward streak at least until the buy back is complete and possibly indefinitely.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
16:28
As if by magic the offer is now 24p.
katsy
12/4/2024
16:25
"Those numbers look lovely, but do not in themselves represent how much each shareholder will benefit, when no one knows where the share price will land afterwards, and thus what the value of the remaining un-tendered shares will be."

--------


This ignorant remark just goes to show how unfit you are to be on the Stock market without professional advice since no-one ever knows where any share price will be next.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
15:42
"Yes, I can.
38.5% x 24p = 9.24p per share. (A)
£3million by back at 22p = 1p per share (with circa 300 million shares in circulation).(B)
Total (A+B) = 10.24p per share returned.
No wonder you guys are always complaining. You can't do even simple maths. Idiots."

Those numbers look lovely, but do not in themselves represent how much each shareholder will benefit, when no one knows where the share price will land afterwards, and thus what the value of the remaining un-tendered shares will be.

But then again terrorwit landed on this forum out of nowhere on the 4th of March, posts on no other thread but this one, and always includes some disparaging remarks, so I guess I'll pay his posts all the attention that they deserve.

twatcher
12/4/2024
14:25
It's Cavendish settling the tender you lamebrain.
terrorwit
12/4/2024
14:12
I would have thought that impossible- only 324 million shares in issue ?
wheeze
12/4/2024
14:01
125 million buy at 24p
johnyee 7
12/4/2024
13:28
"I would have thought any buy back would have waited until those that tendered got their unsold shares back, clearly not."

-------------


There's nothing stopping anyone buying more shares at this price except themselves. It's yet more blame-shifting from irresponsible fools.


-------------

Call me a clown all you like, you can't fault my maths.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
12:06
Clown.Smoke and mirrors.Dividend, as implied by Nano, would have been simpler, cheaper & more transparent. And 10-12p real return.The more complex anything is, the bigger the shafting intended.
jph
12/4/2024
11:38
23.6p to buy right now (was 23.8 earlier). Maybe the company share buyback is going to send the price over 24p, in which case the tender offer looks less then generous. I would have thought any buy back would have waited until those that tendered got their unsold shares back, clearly not.
noccer
12/4/2024
11:36
"Can somebody explain how that is “returning 10 to 12 p per share to shareholders”?"

----------

Yes, I can.

38.5% x 24p = 9.24p per share. (A)

£3million by back at 22p = 1p per share (with circa 300 million shares in circulation).(B)

Total (A+B) = 10.24p per share returned.

No wonder you guys are always complaining. You can't do even simple maths. Idiots.

terrorwit
12/4/2024
10:11
If the share price exceeds 24p at least we have 2/3 (or more) of our holdings getting a good price. And the strategy has worked.Plus 1/3 at a better price than it was.If less than 24p we have the option to buy more (using our new cash) at the lower price, so making a profit.Dont see a problem with that.First time nano has paid out anyway.Also good prospects ahead.
jfacwc
Chat Pages: 2195  2194  2193  2192  2191  2190  2189  2188  2187  2186  2185  2184  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock