Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +1.90p +4.99% 40.00p 39.70p 40.00p 40.00p 39.10p 39.10p 220,835 16:29:57
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Technology Hardware & Equipment 3.3 -7.4 -2.2 - 114.37

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 34451 to 34470 of 34475 messages
Chat Pages: 1379  1378  1377  1376  1375  1374  1373  1372  1371  1370  1369  1368  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
22/5/2019
22:49
There’s an interesting response to the cadmium ban exemption extension application to the RoHS from the Swedish Chemicals Agency (KEMI) on this link hxxps://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/fileadmin/user_upload/RoHS_Pack_15/3rd_Consultation/contribution_SE_CA_KEMI_RoHS15_ex_2018_1_and_39a_20190513.pdf In summary. The agency does not produce QDs (It’s not a commercial organisation hxxps://www.kemi.se/en ) and opposes the application. I imagine this will weigh heavily against the application
nigwit
22/5/2019
22:23
it rose 317% from September 2017 to it’s most recent high of 55.5p. Big profit-taking pull backs are to be expected.
nigwit
22/5/2019
22:20
Thanks - your maths is fine I suspect ;)
howl01
22/5/2019
22:06
About 73% (64p, Deutsche bank)
andycapped
22/5/2019
21:57
What's the percentage increase required to get to target of the expert brokers we're supposed to take note of?
howl01
22/5/2019
18:03
What I meant was a 46% rise from the current price, if returning to the mid fifties.
andycapped
22/5/2019
16:47
The drop isn't welcome but it's always been a possibility since the results were not clear on timings and then Edelman's sale was bound to cause doubts no matter how it's explained or miitgated. ± 30% swings on no news over a few weeks are not uncommon on small caps that have risen fast so I don't see it as a cause of concern long term and I don't believe anyone knows anything they shouldn't. I don't claim to know what will come next, and I don't pay attention to anyone who says they do, but, plainly, it can recover just as fast as it dropped, or faster. If another director buys in or there's a broker's update, perhaps from Jefferies, or better still, a purchase order it might spring right back to 55p or even higher. (You might want to check your maths by the way)
nigwit
22/5/2019
16:08
I think there may be a bit more to it than simply sentiment to justify a 46% price drop in the last month.
andycapped
22/5/2019
11:59
Everything will be okay so long as the company executes its strategy so I tune out the day trades and concentrate on the science and the market potential. All the time Dow, Merck and the US Partner, likely Apple, stay committed to Nanoco I'll see no reason not to feel the same way and I still see a full recovery in due course. Meanwhile, trying to make fast money by influencing weak minds on message boards is not a viable strategy and it's unwise to let those charlatans who attempt to do this influence you. They don't have a mass audience and can only effect things temporarily, or not at all.
nigwit
22/5/2019
11:03
Volume a bit higher some slightly bigger trades going through?
bagpuss67
22/5/2019
06:31
Nigwit. What's your take on the debate on another board about the quality of Nanoco dotscoming out of the ROHS letters?
bagpuss67
21/5/2019
20:11
Looks like the start of someone offloading to me.
howl01
21/5/2019
18:37
A lot of sells but not huge volume overall. And a very odd steam of 500 share sales to start things moving down this am
bagpuss67
21/5/2019
17:36
Either a lot of PI's have been spooked by ME's sale, or there's a larger holder offloading once more.
andycapped
21/5/2019
11:12
Nanosys and DuPont submissions in PDF format added here today. hxxps://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/index.php?id=316 Scroll to the bottom. Unsurprisingly, Nanosys are for the extension and DuPont are against. Nanosys claim that cadmium-based QDs will lead until 2022 when they expect Cd-free dots to catch up. However, this is because they’ve continued to develop cadmium-based dots during the extension to the exemption instead of focusing solely on Cd-free materials, which is against the intent and principles of ROHS. We know that they are massively behind Nanoco and Samsung in relevant CD-free patents. Nanosys go on to claim that until 2022 Cd-free displays with equivalent gamuts to those Cd-based will achieve use more energy, which will lead to greater cadmium and CO2 emissions from power stations more than offsetting the benefits of banning cadmium outright in EEE. It’s clearly going to come down to a balance of legal, political and technical arguments. I’ll keep an eye open for more submissions and for the consultant’s report to the EU and post links here when they appear.
nigwit
21/5/2019
08:42
Wow. Odd trades. Any explanation for that?
bagpuss67
21/5/2019
06:28
Https://statnano.com/news/66048
howl01
21/5/2019
00:27
Http://wdcnews.com/56067/global-uncooled-infrared-imaging-equipment-market-2019-flir-systems-us-fluke-us-sensors-unlimited-us-leonardo-drs-us/
howl01
20/5/2019
22:29
More cynical mocking. All the opposing stakeholders submitted their responses at about the same time at the end of the consultation. hxxps://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/index.php?id=307 And hxxps://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/index.php?id=316
nigwit
20/5/2019
22:00
Glad they finally got their finger out
howl01
Chat Pages: 1379  1378  1377  1376  1375  1374  1373  1372  1371  1370  1369  1368  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
NANO
Nanoco
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20190525 09:53:50