Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[jfacwc] 20/10/2020 18:10

Keeps everyone on their toes for 12 months then.Hopefully this period will be an opportunity for Nanoco to be more adventurous. Please!

[supernumerary] 20/10/2020 14:50

Jury selection set for 4 October 21, so some time before much emerges. Unless one of the parties walks or is otherwise removed from the case of course.

[smithless] 20/10/2020 12:40

Bought a few today. Obviously risks. Read through patent infringement, as others here most probably have, and it looks compelling in favour on Nanoco. The timing of Samsung's sudden breakthrough and Nanoco's input at the time is compelling, especially it's sudden leap forward in Cadmium free quantum dots. hxxps://www.docketalarm.com/cases/Texas_Eastern_District_Court/2--20-cv-00038/Nanoco_Technologies_Ltd._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co._Ltd._et_al/1/2/

[smithless] 19/10/2020 16:49

I think Samsung never thought Nanoco would pursue them and may have tried to muddy the waters by buying QD Vision in 2016. I'm sure Samsung and others do this sort of thing often. The untouchable. With 5m reported QLED TVs sold in 2019 and a lot more since, the case could cost Samsung dearly, thus a heavy weight US law firm willing to take the case on a 'no win no fee' basis. Time will tell.

[ih_169538] 19/10/2020 16:04

Based on past Edison reports ..are they worth really believing their hype ?

[jfacwc] 19/10/2020 15:04

Significant that Nanoco spent the £49.5K to produce this report. Maybe it is a requirement at this level.Nanoco may well be a long term investment.... but could have been so otherwise ... thanks to alleged Samsung illegal activity.If found guilty, Samsung have defrauded Nanoco about $16 a telly. Was this really worth it to them?? Is this how such companies behave. Makes one despair!I almost hope to be wrong, and it turns out Samsung are true Angels.Given this, it gets me how some people here (or anywhere) criticise Nanoco - almost just for the fun of it. The share price certainly does not deserve the hammering.

[smithless] 19/10/2020 13:14

Not really sure what has fundamentally changed since the fund raise at 17.5p in July. Boredom perhaps? But surely those investing would have known they were in for the long haul. Tempted.

[bagpuss67] 19/10/2020 08:48

New Edison report out.

[ih_169538] 16/10/2020 22:37

Crunch is Crunch ..always have been.Hey in 4 years according to the new CEO there might be some positive news.Hang in there

[weatherman] 16/10/2020 22:21

With 750 patents there is scope to licence the more promising ones out - this was BTGs business model before focussing on pharmaceuticals.

[notimpressed] 16/10/2020 21:56

nigwit post 22776, patents only of use if they have commercial value, there are probably still patents for steam engines, unfortunately the technology has moved on.

[knicknack] 16/10/2020 19:25

Why are you here Bones698 aka Crunch you turn up when the share price falls then spout negatives and vanish when the share price rises...Interesting shorting the share price perhaps?

[bones698] 16/10/2020 18:08

Single digits coming fast . The case against samsung will likely result in a license deal but not for anything like the figures many on here are thinking given the numbers of ubit's and costs involved . That if nano has a decent case which is open to which side of the fence your on . Other than that nano looks like a failing buisness , lacking customers and highly loss making so that looks worthless ,infact will probably hurt the shareprice due to its losses. If the case against samsung was so good then why did nobody but nano just for that ? Funny how no decent offers came in even with that on the table . Some people on here clinging on to very faint hopes of a miracle . Mkt cap ridiculous for a loss making high cash burn outfit .

[jfacwc] 16/10/2020 12:19

Do not worry, all will be fine soon enough!All the many LSE posters will happily buy back in again soon, as they all say so, having all wisely sold earlier, once the share price goes into single figures...

[smithless] 16/10/2020 10:25

From my experience, for a 3rd party willing to take on a potential £10m liability for legal proceedings against Samsung, they would expect the outcome to be a £100m+ win. Raise enough cash to see them through to at least 2022.

[freddie ferret] 15/10/2020 23:32

hxxps://www.h2-view.com/story/oxford-university-turning-plastic-waste-into-hydrogen-and-high-value-carbons/

[barkboo] 15/10/2020 21:55

Bones - I do not need to ramp..I am an investor that relies on my book/system and help from friends that know! I guess I can lose on a stock occasionally - but since 2000, I can honestly say that my investments have given me a great lifestyle. I do what I want when I want..and the last thing I would do is persuade readers to invest in a stock on my say so. If you believe that of me, you are more stupid than even I thought. If you only post on here to protect readers from my evil - you are a noble man..truth is, you underestimate other readers and you also have other more dubious motives. I sleep well for one reason, I would never be part of any sting in persuading readers to part with their family's hard earned....you my friend would love to see investors here, take a hit and cash in at a loss. You want this to be a total wipeout! Bones - I believe you to be the same evil guy that used "scampi" on other well known BB's...I even think I know your real name...unless it was a mistake of yours many years ago??

[nigwit] 15/10/2020 17:11

What utter nonsense. You can't claim 750 patents is 'effectively back to square one'. The share price has dropped by 40% since Edelman left. For the last several years many posters have been rudely demanding his departure claiming that it would cause the price to rise. It hasn't so they were wrong, the market isn't short but it's not lying either. Bunch of amateurs here and on LSE and in the worst sense. I'm not against Tenner and his team, they appear to be competent but Mike floated Nanoco and had real passion. Perhaps his fire got doused by Samsung's perdify, which would be tragic, if understandable. I'll check by again when something happens.

[barkboo] 15/10/2020 12:00

Bones - what is the point of being an ADVFN rag? You make little money posting and you show yourself to be of no substance. Those that are invested here are well aware of the risk reward - you have zero financial interest..and are trying to persuade those that have. Take a step back and think about your life. You have worked these bb in the same manner for many years - what a wast!

[bones698] 15/10/2020 11:14

The business model is pretty much dead in the water and will never make money . Lack of customers and costs mean the business side of nano is all but dead imo . The only thing worth anything is the lawsuit . If you value the company looking at it from that point of view a lot of the possible money from the lawsuit is already being priced in and that's if they are successful which I don't believe they will be . Mkt cap 36m with a loss making business high overheads and hanging onto a lawsuit looks very expensive to me worth about half that imo . Heading to single digits fast despite nigwits hopeless ramping .

[bagpuss67] 15/10/2020 07:16

The share price hasnt gone down because ME has left. In fact there's a good chance the shareholders politely asked him to move on. It's because the reality has sunk in that the company's original main product for whatever reason has not been capable of commercialisation over many many years. ME has proved a very unlucky CEO lets face it. Having his key IP stolen if thats what's happened, the EU being rubbish on the CD ban and also the companies transformational contact being cancelled. But thats the game at that level. Things just haven't worked out. Either way we are effectively back at square one as a development company with years to wait for possible commercialisation.

[howl01] 15/10/2020 00:00

Restructuring should indicate to anybody the outrageous manner this 'company" has been run for years under Mike's leadership. The share price reflects efforts of years gone by. Not convinced this outfit has a future - all reliant on the lawsuit. Single figures shortly to await speculation on IP value 2022. No value here IMO. Snooze.

[jfacwc] 14/10/2020 18:25

Nigwit. Not that I don't wish the same outcome as you, but ...I think Mike can be held responsible to quite a number of significant share price drops, during his reign.Also, he had left Tenner and his team with quite a few problems to grapple with. COVID also not helping.I would hope now, you transfer your encouraging comments towards the current team, going forward.The share is wallowing in the hands of shorters for now. Needs some fresh news release - to BURN them.

[nigwit] 14/10/2020 17:56

The short term price is down from 16.6p on August 31, the day before Edelman left, to 11.7p today, just 6 weeks later. That represents a drop of 40%. Some of you wanted 'Mike' to go so much you posted against him for years. I hope you're still pleased. ------- I'm still because in my view the technology at the core is inherently valuable and with costs under control and no debt my investment should come good eventually. Tenner seems like an excellent manager and anything could happen without warning but the story's lost something intangible but that feels important. Maybe it's missing some inspiration. Let's see if Tenner and his team can find it again.