Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[millwallfan] 24/1/2021 10:34

Apologies I’ve missed something. What is the ‘marksman̵7; hearing in relation to our case. Thanks in advance

[barkboo] 24/1/2021 09:43

44 of 419 "False markets must not be created in the securities of: (a) the offeree company; (b) if the offeror is a company, that company; or (c) any other company concerned by the takeover bid in such a way that the rise or fall of the prices of the securities becomes artificial and the normal functioning of the markets is distorted."

[barkboo] 24/1/2021 09:14

I think we discussed this at the time - "a number of interested parties" could mean two, but it does suggest more than two?

[barkboo] 24/1/2021 09:10

I think it is also worth remembering that less than a year ago the Company rns'd they had received takeover interest from a 'number' of parties. Nanoco said, "it had received takeover interest from a number of interested parties and invited them to conduct due diligence." Now if one of those interested parties have come back for a second look - that would be bad news for Samsung and good news for us and the share price imo.

[piratepeter] 23/1/2021 12:34

Markman scheduled for 26 March at 1330 hrs local time in Texas

[malcrane10] 23/1/2021 11:03

So when is this Markman hearing sheduled for? Does anybody actually know the true date of it?

[nigwit] 22/1/2021 20:21

“Simple case of being oversold and due a return to fair value as far as I can see” I agree completely. Any rational discounted valuation of the legal case and patents would show fair value well above today’s mCap and there are no cash concerns, a decent R and D pipeline with early potential and no downside risk in the litigation due to heavyweight insurance. Whilst generally on these boards it’s considered clever not to believe anything we’re told I think the better skill in life is to know when you’re being told the truth. However, they would be far less popular and entertaining without all their half-baked conspiracies about manipulation, insider dealing and tenuously contrived reasonings. The normally more sober LSE board is a comedic fantasy today. Still, if that’s what it takes to get the price up.

[longshanks] 22/1/2021 17:50

Doubt it. Simple case of being oversold and due a return to fair value as far as I can see.13-15p looks a good short term target (~200d moving average)

[barkboo] 22/1/2021 17:32

Pleasantly surprised - I agree, i think today has come off the back of decent news...

[activmojo] 22/1/2021 17:09

Weekend news article maybe?

[millwallfan] 22/1/2021 16:58

Best one day performance for some time and also to hold the intraday rise.

[barkboo] 22/1/2021 13:18

escapetohome/longshanks - It looks like we have a nice group of investors here, that are very strong in their thoughts... Looking forward to a tasty return here.

[longshanks] 22/1/2021 13:14

You are not alone @escapetohome ;)

[escapetohome] 22/1/2021 13:11

Very much so Barkboo. Ive watched this share for years and finally saw it was bottoming so dipped a toe. Always respected the tech here.

[barkboo] 22/1/2021 12:46

escapetohome - I hope you are correct..I am nicely invested here, so I want up.. but I think this price will be capped until closer to the hearing or an agreement with Samsung is reached.

[escapetohome] 22/1/2021 12:32

Seems to be building a base above 10p. Great.

[millwallfan] 21/1/2021 21:15

Perhaps our biggest challenge is timeline - how long (years) will Samsung be able to duck and dive, Bob and weave, shimmy and shammy, twist and turn,to defer the day of reckoning ??????

[barkboo] 21/1/2021 17:31

Yes - I understand that their previous is for all to see and judge, they after all stole our product. I was more trying to make the point that these markets are manipulated on a regular basis....and all the time regulators get their wages from those they regulate, we will never have straight markets. If this share price stays at around 10p - we could be shafted for a 60p take out.

[millwallfan] 21/1/2021 17:13

Barkboo. I don’t think anyone here has ever contended that Samsung are whiter than white as far as nano or any other transactions are concerned. However, we are NOT judge and jury here and it is for the court to determine if there has been any patented IP infringement in our specific case.

[barkboo] 21/1/2021 17:06

It is strange that we refuse to believe a rogue company like Samsung would not play underhanded with the market - and yet BlackRock, the largest Asset Management business and Goldman Sachs a leading global investment bank.. securities and investment management outfit - cheat for fun...and are fined on a regular basis. In fact Goldman Sachs payed over 5 billion for its activities and part in the 2008 crash...not forgetting Morgan Stanley behaviour...peanuts compared with the prizes. If you were to turn over your local Building Society for a 100k - and the courts/regulators fined you 20k...would you stop doing it? lol

[barkboo] 21/1/2021 16:39

Ok - tomorrow 9.8 close. lol

[activmojo] 21/1/2021 15:09

Samsung had the opportunity to buy this before the court case commenced but never bothered, if we loose the infringement case it may survive if we get a deal with STmicro before then. If we win then we're in a strong position and shouldn't even contemplate selling i think a sale is highly unlikely.

[bagpuss67] 21/1/2021 14:57

Only thing is this is nanoco. It's never lucky! Having said that I will hold my 300k shares to the end! If amazingly we win it will be a pleasant part recovery or my losses here..