Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[barkbooo] 07/6/2024 12:09

PPE - you are exactly correct imo….and that’s why the rags on here work so hard for the company!

The share price does not lie - that is all we will get thanks to BT’s actions…the ADVFN rags are apparently happy with the price, lol but they don’t like us pointing out the facts.

[terrorwit] 07/6/2024 11:35

The constant demands for information on the other board are likewise toxic. It's as if Kooba ad co. are trying to run the business via the forum because they think Nanoco is only about their tiny day trades.

If they can't wait for more news they should sell.

[paul planet earth1] 07/6/2024 11:09

I expect the share price is depressed because BT was caught out lying to retail investors and sold them down the river by getting into bed with both LOAM and RG!

Oh btw where is RG now, ran for the hills with the stolen booty by the looks of things, so lucky he had a head start, it's almost as if both LOAM and RG were fully aware of what was going on while retail investors were being mugged off with false stories!

[beeezzz] 06/6/2024 18:54

SP drifting down to its cash value, company valued at zilch...

[unglove] 06/6/2024 18:26

Tweedledum and Tweedledee lol

[coiin stein] 06/6/2024 16:44

𝐉𝐨𝐮𝐬9853;𝐢Ү47;𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨9853;𝐢Ү47;𝐠 𝐟𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫9838;𝐥.
𝐅𝐮𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬9853;, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐞9845;𝐭Ү58; 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐫9852; 𝐨𝐟𝐟 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜9844;𝐥Ү58;.
𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐥9834;𝐜Ү38; 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 .... 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐰𝐞'𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤9842;𝐧Ү40;

[barkbooo] 06/6/2024 15:23

“𝐎9847;𝐥Ү58; 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚9847;𝐜Ү42;𝐚𝐥; 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢9836;𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞9851; 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧9858;𝐦Ү48;𝐮𝐬; 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐮9846;.”

I listened to BT, the CEO that should be honest - that was my problem….he217;s a compulsive liar!

[coiin stein] 06/6/2024 13:51

𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐢9847;𝐠 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞9847;𝐭Ү42;𝐨𝐧;
𝐋𝐨𝐚𝐦 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮9845;𝐚Ү51;𝐥𝐲; 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐮9836;𝐢Ү47;𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨9854;𝐠Ү41;𝐨𝐮;𝐭 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥9837; 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥9858; 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮9834;𝐫Ү58; 2023, 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧9834;𝐥Ү52; 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫9838;.
𝐁𝐈𝐆 𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬
𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐧𝐨 .. 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭9838;𝐧Ү38;𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐬𝐮𝐚9845; 𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐩9838;𝐜Ү53;𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢9851; 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐩 𝐩𝐞𝐝𝐚9845;.
𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚9847;𝐜Ү42;𝐚𝐥; 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢9836;𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞9851; 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧9858;𝐦Ү48;𝐮𝐬; 𝐟𝐮𝐜𝐤9856;𝐢Ү53;𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐮9846;.

[terrorwit] 06/6/2024 12:59

BT saved the company and won $150 from Samsung that's why the overwhelming majority of shareholders have now voted twice to retain him

You were offered a payout but say you declined it so, true to form, you're making mistakes then blaming everyone else.

[barkbooo] 06/6/2024 09:51

Having said above..the Company have deceived their small investors - I still believe NANO are investable with BT gone!

How long he is around to deceive is the problem.

[barkbooo] 06/6/2024 09:34

YasX - I was offered a gamble….i don’t gamble! I was promised 10-12p payment.

[barkbooo] 06/6/2024 09:33

As far as posters on ADVFN - I have been around over 20 years on here - ADVFN rags all have the same way of posting, they hunt in packs and work a stock relentlessly.

Their posts are simply attacking investors with an opposite view and have free access to the plus one coin top post…they are simply ADVFN rags designed to disrupt.

Be careful what you write - ADVFN are not neutral, and you will be punished to serve their agenda.

We have such posters on here!

[yasx] 06/6/2024 09:32

Barkboo,

You did have the option to tender at 24p - given many elected not to, those that did managed (across several accounts0 to tender more than the entitlement. In some cases that amounted to the entire holding.

Selling at 24p and now buying back at around 17p 9if those that tendered wish to do so) was a far better outcome than holding on hoping for a deal in the short term to take it beyond 24p.

[beeezzz] 06/6/2024 09:22

Looks like the buyback may have been halted because BT and BOD are not that confident they have enough to last until they retire, no sign of orders being announced...

Looking after there own interests is far more important....

[coiin stein] 05/6/2024 22:08

𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥9842;𝐧Ү38;, 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞9853;𝐞Ү37; 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐉𝐮𝐧 '𝟐𝟒 - 𝟎𝟎:𝟑𝟗 - 𝟑𝟗𝟔𝟓0782; 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐯9838;
𝐅𝐖𝐈𝐖R30; 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐢9847;𝐠 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐩𝐮𝐛 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧9840; 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞9851;𝐧Ү38;𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞, 𝐯𝐮𝐥𝐠9834;𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐠9854;𝐬Ү53;𝐢𝐧;𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦9838;𝐧Ү53;𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮9853; 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐭9841;𝐞Ү51; 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭9838;𝐫, 𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞9845;𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢9852;𝐚Ү35;𝐥𝐞;.
𝐀𝐥𝐭𝐡9848;𝐮Ү40;𝐡 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞9851; 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞9853;𝐞Ү37; 𝐢𝐭, 𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬9847;’𝐭; 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞9853;𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩9845;𝐞Ү53;𝐞𝐥;𝐲 …. 𝐢𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫9838; 𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤.
𝐒𝐨 𝐚𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐞𝐞, 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐧'
19853; 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐚9851;𝐫Ү34;𝐬𝐬;𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧9838;𝐭 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭9841; 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐫𝐞, 𝐂.𝐔.𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭.
19827;𝐮w838;𝐬⻏7;𝐚𝐲

[terrorwit] 04/6/2024 20:22

Yes, I suspect LOAM will regard it as a qualified success and a bloody nose for Hamoodi who would have wanted to see all his claims going the distance.

[supernumerary] 04/6/2024 20:09

Oh well, 2 claims down, 2 to go. I expect the lawyers will be happy. Good to see the conspiracy claim disallowed.