ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

19.06
-0.10 (-0.52%)
26 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.10 -0.52% 19.06 19.24 19.78 19.60 19.24 19.60 376,884 16:35:17
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0342 5.63 62.42M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 19.16p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 23.55p.

Nanoco currently has 324,418,728 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £62.42 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.63.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 55201 to 55219 of 55400 messages
Chat Pages: 2216  2215  2214  2213  2212  2211  2210  2209  2208  2207  2206  2205  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
28/5/2024
17:06
Clown.The next time you post anything useful will be the first.
jph
28/5/2024
17:04
Please hold your breath
terrorwit
28/5/2024
15:06
It does refer to a different company, but Apple are dropping them because Apple are overhauling the face recognition tech in the phone. It would be nice to think Nano and ST are involved, but I am not holding my breath.
jph
28/5/2024
11:31
Not surprised to see the share price dropping following the tender offer but the Telegraph article refers to Coherent Corp listed on Nasdaq.
pj84
28/5/2024
09:50
The good thing about Nano unlike many a small tech start up is that it is fully funded for no doubt the next five year's unlike some tiny firms I can mention!..isn't that right Bones698, how's AGL doing, oh its not, shame..


Nanoco won't need cash placement for year's unlike AGL a matter of weeks lol!

paul planet earth1
28/5/2024
09:23
That suggests Apple is changing its face ID technology, which news dovetails nicely with Nanoco's hopes that they'll replace it with underscreen chips using SWIR sensors
terrorwit
28/5/2024
09:03
For info - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/05/25/british-microchip-plant-faces-closure-apple-pulls-plug/Not holding my breath.....
jph
27/5/2024
14:09
I see ever you thing I said has come true here the poor settlement and the poor performance and shafing of shareholders thereafter. No major deals signed an d the board using the money they kept to look after their jobs whilst delivering sweet fa.
Can't say in s0uroised and to think some thought this was a good share with good prospects. Just goes to show how wrong some amateurish pis really are.

750m still. Makes me laugh and they truly believed that lol. Enjoy watching paint dry here while Samsung got away with it and even the patents and continue on their merry way

bones698
25/5/2024
07:12
Ignored for obvious reasons.
paul planet earth1
24/5/2024
14:16
Love how immediately I post someone anonymously ticks it down. This has been happening since I returned and it proves I'm getting across.

Bitterness only hurts its owner.

terrorwit
24/5/2024
13:29
Obviously, due to lack of liquidity, Cavendish are unable to buy sufficient shares at present without sending the price over 105% of the previous day's price, which is the daily limit set out in the buy back announcement.

Please draw your own conclusions.

terrorwit
22/5/2024
09:18
SWIR sensors incorporating Nanoco's technology are available to STM's customers.

Look it up.

terrorwit
22/5/2024
08:51
Still nothing from the Board to demonstrate that they were/are on the cusp of commercialisation.

Until proven otherwise, all they have is some cash - the rest is effectively worthless unless or until it can show a route to monetisation. Talking up great prospects is one thing, delivering on the same an entirely different matter.

yasx
22/5/2024
08:43
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐮 9851;𝐩Ү34;𝐬𝐬;𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐅𝐔𝐂𝐊 9830;𝐈Ү27;𝐓𝐄;𝐑𝐘
coiin stein
22/5/2024
08:32
Do the maths. RG sold long before the settlement at 24p, LOAM made a few £million at best. There was nothing underhand. They merely understood more than others, as we should expect given their better experience. They would not risk their businesses or careers for such small sums even if they were criminals, which they aren't.

All the accusations to the contrary are nothing but reflections of your own incompetence, greed, impatience and envy.

terrorwit
22/5/2024
06:06
If those posters only got involved for the Samsung case what if it? They saw an opportunity to make money and took it. Ultimately that is why people invest.
chilom
21/5/2024
21:55
Surprising as it may seem, Kooba"s posts do add value,in contrast to the astonishingly frequent content-free posts by some others.
tbow112
21/5/2024
21:40
Well NigWit you're in a unique class of your own ..well two if you include Colin W@nkst@in one of your other pathetic sock puppet accounts!
paul planet earth1
21/5/2024
19:08
Many of the posters on here and LSE have been invested for several years. You bought most of your holding in 2019,many investors on this board have been posting since then. Albeit usually under only one pseudonym.
chilom
Chat Pages: 2216  2215  2214  2213  2212  2211  2210  2209  2208  2207  2206  2205  Older