We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.10 | -0.52% | 19.06 | 19.24 | 19.78 | 19.60 | 19.24 | 19.60 | 376,884 | 16:35:17 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0342 | 5.63 | 62.42M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/5/2024 17:06 | Clown.The next time you post anything useful will be the first. | jph | |
28/5/2024 17:04 | Please hold your breath | terrorwit | |
28/5/2024 15:06 | It does refer to a different company, but Apple are dropping them because Apple are overhauling the face recognition tech in the phone. It would be nice to think Nano and ST are involved, but I am not holding my breath. | jph | |
28/5/2024 11:31 | Not surprised to see the share price dropping following the tender offer but the Telegraph article refers to Coherent Corp listed on Nasdaq. | pj84 | |
28/5/2024 09:50 | The good thing about Nano unlike many a small tech start up is that it is fully funded for no doubt the next five year's unlike some tiny firms I can mention!..isn't that right Bones698, how's AGL doing, oh its not, shame.. Nanoco won't need cash placement for year's unlike AGL a matter of weeks lol! | paul planet earth1 | |
28/5/2024 09:23 | That suggests Apple is changing its face ID technology, which news dovetails nicely with Nanoco's hopes that they'll replace it with underscreen chips using SWIR sensors | terrorwit | |
28/5/2024 09:03 | For info - http://www.telegraph | jph | |
27/5/2024 14:09 | I see ever you thing I said has come true here the poor settlement and the poor performance and shafing of shareholders thereafter. No major deals signed an d the board using the money they kept to look after their jobs whilst delivering sweet fa. Can't say in s0uroised and to think some thought this was a good share with good prospects. Just goes to show how wrong some amateurish pis really are. 750m still. Makes me laugh and they truly believed that lol. Enjoy watching paint dry here while Samsung got away with it and even the patents and continue on their merry way | bones698 | |
25/5/2024 07:12 | Ignored for obvious reasons. | paul planet earth1 | |
24/5/2024 14:16 | Love how immediately I post someone anonymously ticks it down. This has been happening since I returned and it proves I'm getting across. Bitterness only hurts its owner. | terrorwit | |
24/5/2024 13:29 | Obviously, due to lack of liquidity, Cavendish are unable to buy sufficient shares at present without sending the price over 105% of the previous day's price, which is the daily limit set out in the buy back announcement. Please draw your own conclusions. | terrorwit | |
22/5/2024 09:18 | SWIR sensors incorporating Nanoco's technology are available to STM's customers. Look it up. | terrorwit | |
22/5/2024 08:51 | Still nothing from the Board to demonstrate that they were/are on the cusp of commercialisation. Until proven otherwise, all they have is some cash - the rest is effectively worthless unless or until it can show a route to monetisation. Talking up great prospects is one thing, delivering on the same an entirely different matter. | yasx | |
22/5/2024 08:43 | 𝐚𝐧 | coiin stein | |
22/5/2024 08:32 | Do the maths. RG sold long before the settlement at 24p, LOAM made a few £million at best. There was nothing underhand. They merely understood more than others, as we should expect given their better experience. They would not risk their businesses or careers for such small sums even if they were criminals, which they aren't. All the accusations to the contrary are nothing but reflections of your own incompetence, greed, impatience and envy. | terrorwit | |
22/5/2024 06:06 | If those posters only got involved for the Samsung case what if it? They saw an opportunity to make money and took it. Ultimately that is why people invest. | chilom | |
21/5/2024 21:55 | Surprising as it may seem, Kooba"s posts do add value,in contrast to the astonishingly frequent content-free posts by some others. | tbow112 | |
21/5/2024 21:40 | Well NigWit you're in a unique class of your own ..well two if you include Colin W@nkst@in one of your other pathetic sock puppet accounts! | paul planet earth1 | |
21/5/2024 19:08 | Many of the posters on here and LSE have been invested for several years. You bought most of your holding in 2019,many investors on this board have been posting since then. Albeit usually under only one pseudonym. | chilom |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions