Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[chilom] 21/5/2024 15:02

They should care and it should make a difference.
They work for shareholders.

[terrorwit] 21/5/2024 13:36

You think I'm deluded for believing in the company in which you invested?

Do you honestly think that anyone at Nanoco cares to read your years of whinging here and and that it's going to make any difference to anything they do?

You're pathetic. Making up sad little stories about how Nanoco is managed and about me and anyone else who doesn't share your self-inflicted distress.

[terrorwit] 21/5/2024 10:34

I don't care what any of you believe. You're all acting like drunk toddlers and I have no respect for you.

[fat frank] 21/5/2024 10:10

And if this 6-10p purchase range was truewas true why didn't he sell at 70p in Jan 2023???

[terrorwit] 21/5/2024 09:09

I bought most of my share in 2019 between 6p and 10p and have taken profits twice now.

Not allowing myself to be fooled by your idiotic stories and listening to the company instead has been my winning strategy.

[paul planet earth1] 20/5/2024 21:15

"Many of us have held Nanoco loyally for many more years"..

How's that worked out for you Terrorwit over the last 20 years?

[coiin stein] 20/5/2024 19:41

𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐅𝐔𝐂𝐊9830;𝐈Ү27;𝐒

[terrorwit] 20/5/2024 19:16

Does anyone know the collective noun for blithering idiots?

[jph] 20/5/2024 18:28

Clown Alert!You are performing very well today, unlike Nano...

[terrorwit] 20/5/2024 17:00

What are you on about now you blithering idiot?

[paul planet earth1] 20/5/2024 12:22

Showing your true colors again once cornered with the facts!

[terrorwit] 20/5/2024 08:33

I see you spent all weekend spreading poisonous lies as usual.

[paul planet earth1] 19/5/2024 14:41

Thought you stated that postings to these BB's have no effect on the share price!

[terrorwit] 19/5/2024 11:28

Ticking my posts down doesn't change the fact that you only have yourselves to blame if things didn't go how you wanted. You'll just keep making the same basic errors until you've lost all your money.

[terrorwit] 19/5/2024 10:54

WRONG!

LOAM sold down and RG sold out because you pumping PI's posting thousands of times every week, abetted by Hammoodi dropping wild numbers to The Times, handed them a gift they couldn't refuse.

You were all still ramping it at 70p. Idiots.

[beeezzz] 19/5/2024 10:05

PI's may have got burned, which was not the case for LOAM and RG who were tipped off...obviously BOD....

[terrorwit] 19/5/2024 09:51

Here's one for Troublesome

"Thinking is difficult. That's why most people judge."

Carl Jung.

[terrorwit] 19/5/2024 08:12

The difference between you and me is that I've fought commercial litigations so I know and you don't.

If the company hadn't taken the offer it would most likely no longer exist. Certainly, it wasn't worth taking the risk of trial and if it had done and if it had then not won as much as Samusung's offer it would have been liable for all the legal costs from the time of the offer.

The problem here is that people got a romantic notion of some massive, unprecedented David v Goliath battle in their heads instead of listening to wiser people and they can't drop it even now. In truth the dispute could have been lost altogether.

[millwallfan] 18/5/2024 22:43

TW. I feel you are being somewhat disingenuous - as a small PI my feelings are very much in line with PPE. There is quite a degree of documented evidence from the company and others ( including the Markman outcome and detail of Samsung worldwide sales profits) that the Samsung settlement should have been significantly higher than the settlement. So to state ‘none of that is true’ is in itself completely inaccurate!

[paul planet earth1] 18/5/2024 06:41

From the LSE BB

TwoGood2Die

Posts: 2,527

Price: 17.80

No Opinion

A question of integrity!

Today 06:36

"Successful businesses build positive relations with all their investors, treating them all fairly, and providing accurate and timely updates on commercial progress.

With Nanoco we have a CEO who lacks both a scientific background, doesn't have relevant qd industry experience, nor is a well respected industry leading figure...This must to an extent put off would be customers....

We also have the Samsung debacle, a poor financial return, way below what the company had been alluding to through it own broadcasts and through using third parties such as Edison, and reflected at the time through leading financial papers.

We then have the integrity issue, firstly all the misleading guidance leading up to the settlement and the shenigans behind closed doors with the likes of both LOAM and RG who dumped their shares while retail investors were being fed inaccurate and untrue information....

We then have the financial outcome way below industry experts analysis...add to that the unwarranted sale of 118 patents without I might add share holder prior approval...

What's infuriating for many is not having a vote on the Samsung deal and knowing what exactly was being given away...

We are now just treading water, the share price is drifting back down to the 12p cash price, and the market has lost all faith in the Board, while Nanoco is not seen anymore as an exciting high tech potentially global leading business but more of a drab, dull, poorly managed firm, drifting along, with a Board completely out of touch and ignorant to the concerns of its multitude of retail investors who the CEO liberally and arrogantly refers in a derogatory manner as 'speculative gamblers'.

Think this sums up BT's performance 5 years into the job....In my view he should have stepped down shortly after the shambolic Samsung settlement deal was signed....IMHO!"