Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[jfacwc] 27/3/2017 10:41

cheers ddendless mystery

[darkdogs] 27/3/2017 09:38

Probs gone through isdx, i know a few of my trades have gone through there via hl. and don't show

[jfacwc] 27/3/2017 09:24

had to sell a few this morning.Notice my trades have not appeared . Use HL.Does this mean HL are keeping them, as they are expecting price rise, for whatever reason? Or is this normal.

[minsky] 27/3/2017 08:57

I don't know if anyone remembers the big spike in volume a couple of weeks ago. The FCA have finally updated the supposedly daily short positions spreadsheet covering that period. It shows no change, so the spike wasnt short covering by the 4 main companies shown below.
GMT Capital Corp 1.70
GSA Capital Partners LLP 1.08
JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Ltd 0.90
Teton Capital Partners, L.P. 0.67

[ih_169538] 27/3/2017 04:28

hxxps://z-news.link/created-the-worlds-first-5-inch-amqled-display/

[ih_169538] 26/3/2017 22:38

Good luck with your investment ..just remember to use facts instead of folklore or fantasy when promoting Nanoco.You might then achieve a little respect.

[syd7777] 26/3/2017 21:46

We have had enough of kin Jung Uns rhetoric here and the rubbish we have to put up with.CRUNCH take your fantasy and childish dreams on a board that might listen to it, like Samsung,Merck,WH,Dow instead of here!

[ih_169538] 26/3/2017 21:39

QMC knows how to scale up and own the IP for it..why would they license something they can do themselves at considerably less Capex and Opex.T)QMC does not need 60000sq ft facilities ( Capex)and hundreds of employees ( Opex )to match or exceed output Hansol/Nanosys or Dow/Nanoco can produce.Its why the chinese partners choose QMC and why BOE are in discussions with them.
No one ever comments on why Tokyo Electron,Osram and LG dropped Nanoco tech or why Dow renogotiated and still havent sold a commercial amount of Nanoco patented material.Ask yoursrlf why that happened ..a lot of its public info.

[ih_169538] 26/3/2017 21:26

They didn't reject it..they don't own IP for it!!!Everyone else is stuck with batch FACT.QLED patents have nothing to do with being able to mass produce cad free or cad qd, you still havent figured that out ? BTW ..QMC owns patent on printing of oled or qd for photoluminescent and electroluminescent..its obvious there are/ will be companies directly infringing on this patent.BTW QDVision said the same about QMC and so did others here years ago.QDV is gone and QMC is still progressing well.

[syd7777] 26/3/2017 19:04

The Question has not been answered as how Samsung,DOW,Merck,Nanoco have all rejected the flow process.The answer is quality,we all know what happened to QD vision by them producing useless QDs the same applies to QMC cheap low budget companies might take up the offer only to realise the quality later.Then QLED will see them vanish as they have no RnD in that field.One horse wonder that will be out of the equation by late 2019 guaranteed.

[bagpuss67] 26/3/2017 18:37

Doesn't matter how good the QMC tech is if they run out of money. The shareholder letter suggests that this could happen...

[notimpressed] 26/3/2017 17:58

crunch if flow is superior, why have Samsung not brought
it in under licence instead of going with nanosys
also why did dow and merck go with nano

[ih_169538] 26/3/2017 17:35

Roadkill ..your on crack ..they are working with "5 major film makers" and are in discussions with BOE ( largest shipper in the world of panels in january ).QMA is fully funded to the tune of 20 million and their partner just received 430 million from the chinese government.They are partnered with key players in chinese government and business in the largest market in the world and have expanded to building two production and r & d sites in China .Maybe you missed the most important part that they can do 100 optimizations a day which using batch would take months.That is the key differentiator between QMC and all others.Flow process is what mass production is all about giving a serious Capex and Opex advantage.A previous article has them targeting SID to show displays.Nanoco not showing again yill IFA months later..rumor has it that CES proto is a repeat of the LG proto and thats all it will ever be.QMC wants to do it right the first time.Good luck with your investments

[notimpressed] 26/3/2017 16:15

mrplay, why do you think there is a deal with Samsung?

[notimpressed] 26/3/2017 12:16

syd super news, the only downside is I only get 3 kisses on the bottom,
normally 5 is the required minimum.

[mr.oz] 26/3/2017 11:06

It's a year old and they talk about cad free displays

[bentheboy] 26/3/2017 09:25

Interesting comment only company offering cadmium free....

[syd7777] 26/3/2017 03:23

Notimpressed since you have guessed right,I CW have some news I can finally say.Philips have signed with WH,while Nanocos partners TCL and Hisence will also be getting supplied from WH for the 65" plus and will go below that by next summer.The unnamed TV company is Apple with 65" plus looking for supply from Merck by 2018 and DOW is about to supply Samsung with the signage ambitions.ME will announce a major deal in the summer after negotiations are concluded in the US. Nanoco is looking for the best agreement from 3 not one biotech company interested..Yours Sincerely Caroline Watson xxx

[notimpressed] 25/3/2017 20:52

I think syd is caroline watson