Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[roadster750] 25/3/2017 20:17

things looking bleak for qmc

[andycapped] 25/3/2017 13:37

Not ignoring that at all. I've pointed out in previous posts that what licensees do isn't strictly within Nanoco's control. However they have stated that information would be more free flowing following the Dow restructure, they have said that all the major display companies want their dots, they have said that Dow were getting ready to supply the 'Big S'.

So far we have three prototype TV's, with no visible guarantee of full production with CFQD film, and some hoped for profits from the sale of CFQD resin to Wah Hong and Merck.

I'm invested in other companies, and they give out far more information than Nanoco. they need to raise their game in this area.

[notimpressed] 25/3/2017 12:54

Everyone is ignoring the fact that nano cannot determine roll out of cfqd display. They are only part of the chain. The big unknown is the Dow lg deal which on the face of it appears to have dissolved. This does not mean it is dead just delayed due to lg pursuing oled and being caught on the hop by samsung. We also do not know if Dow have other customers In the pipeline
Case of ls the glass half full or half empty

[mrplay] 25/3/2017 11:56

Lets say Mike knew he was not going to be able to produce what he stated. Is this not inside trading. lets say he knows he can not meet his latest targets, he knows he will have to raise cash again. Share price will drop especialy if he is offering it at 30p. Cashing out at 41 is a great deal for him. He did cash out before, raising a couple of million for his move to the states so he could conduct more business with DOW???? that turned out great. Only real company moving forward seems to be Europe based.

[bagpuss67] 25/3/2017 11:38

Looks like QMC nearly went bust and desperately needs to raise cash (see recent SEC filing and shareholder letter).

In another world where our management/ LG/ Dow hadn't screwed this all up Nano might have been able to acquire QMC. Looks like the early innovators in this field just went a bit too soon and may not be about to capitalise on the market when it really lifts off.

I think Nano will be given an extra year by the IIs at a price. ME gone, costs cut dramatically, total focus on comercialising display in exchange for 5-10m at say 30p imho

[andycapped] 25/3/2017 11:30

Apart from the prototypes at this years CES, which didn't exactly enthuse investors, there's been precious little news since last Summer.

Too much 'nudge, nudge, wink,wink' and not enough solid facts. I don't know how much of the recent share price fluctuation is down to financial manipulation or jittery PI's throwing in the towel- perhaps a combination of both. Someone out there is mopping them up however.

[mrplay] 25/3/2017 09:27

If indeed what you have said is true. WOW. I really did not think I or others could control a multi million pound company from a forum. Using my magical powers share price go up. Hey Caroline if it goes up you can take all the credit. Also Caroline you got a hefty bonus this year. Do you deserve it, No way. Caroline, you can hear the issues. No updates. Worst PR ever.

[syd7777] 25/3/2017 03:42

Lauders:Yes same here with the results from the previous 6 months but do expect a very hot summer again if no more donations are needed.

[lauders] 25/3/2017 03:36

Hot as usual! Songkrang not too far off. Perhaps NANO will have performed a miracle by then and provided shareholders with some worthwhile/constructive/positive/hopeful news? Not holding my breath though!

[syd7777] 25/3/2017 03:30

Lauders hope the weather is cool in Thailand 😰

[lauders] 25/3/2017 02:52

Agreed syd7777. PR in NANO has always been dire and that goes for quite a few smaller companies. I recently contacted a large FTSE company about something I needed clarification on and received a very prompt reply clearing the matter up. I asked if I could share it and there was no problem with it so I did. Before that I asked a much smaller company to update their website as the financials page was showing the wrong information (out of date). I sent the message to the CEO and copied other managers. I received a very quick reply saying thank you so much for pointing out the issue and within a day it was rectified. NANO & FFWD, another "dog" I am currently "invested" in, need to get their PR acts together. Ignoring their shareholders and not caring what they have to say may be fine by them, but it is unprofessional to say the least. Good luck everyone here. Think you/we will need it!

[syd7777] 25/3/2017 02:46

The PR needs to be sacked for frightening investors and for doing nothing at all.

[syd7777] 25/3/2017 02:34

I have noticed Caroline Watson has noticed my posts on here,with communication through another friend.We have in the past asked her questions that has been shared here but she has said its between her and the correspondence of the email and not to be shared here.WHAT utter rubbish and where is the PR?She is blaming the board for the downfall of the share price and has reiterated anything she says via her Email should not be shared here.The problem is within the company as SSW has more information then the investors.Anymore falls next week cannot be blamed on this public chat board and they better pull their socks up on the 4th

[notimpressed] 24/3/2017 21:57

dltbgyd, perhaps you could fork out $4000 bucks and get the full report.

[dltbgyd] 24/3/2017 21:45

I agree it does n't say it is a list in order of rank

[notimpressed] 24/3/2017 17:37

who are newshawk and what are their credentials for drawing up
the table of companies, it is always worth questioning the
impartiality of these reports
IT IS NOT a table, just a list of companies covered

[minsky] 24/3/2017 16:59

Does QD Vision exist as a company? Samusung recently bought their IP for $70m

[mrplay] 24/3/2017 16:07

Apparently we are 3rd and 6th -
1 Nanosys
2 QDVision
3 Nanoco Technologies
4 Ocean NanoTech
5 CAN GmbH
6 Dow
7 Quantum Materials Corp
-
hxxps://firstnewshawk.com/global-quantum-dot-market-2017-nanosys-qdvision-nanoco-technologies/

[minsky] 24/3/2017 15:00

stun - you're right, that's what's on the web page, but in the current Nanoco model, quantum dots are embedded in film which is applied to TV screens (this is what Wah Hong are doing). Is Dow Display Materials selling raw dots? Or is Dow Display Films selling qdot film?

[notimpressed] 24/3/2017 14:43

From CEO statement 11th oct 2016

" During the year ahead we intend to continue to roll out our technology in display whilst also advancing our other target markets."

as we are 5 months on, some news of progress if not revenue
must be on the near term horizon.
its going to be a tense 11 days

[jfacwc] 24/3/2017 14:23

would have thought, in the field of Quantum technology, which changes by the day, this may have been reflected somewhere on this site?

[notimpressed] 24/3/2017 14:16

mrplay no updates can be seen as a positive,
if the product was defunct the webpage would have been removed.
No updates means the product is mature and in no further
need of development.
all imho of course

[mrplay] 24/3/2017 14:01

very old and no new updates in over a year