Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[ignoble] 28/9/2020 16:20

I suppose the only good thing about football players earning massive amounts of money is that it is taxable via P.A.Y.E.

Government must make a small fortune on the Income Tax deducted from their vast salaries

[k38] 28/9/2020 16:12

Anything above 50.000 a week it's crazy. It's time for the taxman to have a good look, especially now, and tax all them above the 50.000 salaries a week at 75%.

[maxk] 28/9/2020 15:37

28 September 2020

The row over Charles Moore and Paul Dacre exposes the entitlement of the institutional left


By Henry Hill

[dagoberia] 28/9/2020 15:20

Apologies i see this was already posted

[dagoberia] 28/9/2020 15:19

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-8775497/amp/Banks-set-dividend-return-NatWest-Lloyds-hope.html

[dope007] 28/9/2020 15:07

With the dividend potential and balance sheet news this weekend I would expect large short positions to be unwound now

[silver tortoise] 28/9/2020 14:37

Yes I agree,what really hacked me off (Polite word) was that Memut Ozil would not take a pay cut from his £350000 per week.

[grahamite2] 28/9/2020 14:31

Thanks xxxxy. Strange that a search on Hoyle Brady Amendment didn't bring that up.

The text is rather different from the very assertive headline you quoted. "Speaker Lindsay Hoyle is expected to save Boris Johnson's blushes by refusing to call a rebel Tory amendment..."



The argument makes sense, but the question is what the government will do. As someone recently said, they'd be bonkers to try and just ignore an amendment tabled by the Chairman of the 1922.

[cobourg1] 28/9/2020 14:07

From the above graph 28p looks like a resistance point if you believe that kind of TA stuff.

[xxxxxy] 28/9/2020 14:01

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle WON'T allow vote on Tory rebel amendment over Covid curbs because 'he doesn't want to do a John Bercow' by bending Commons rules - despite '100 MPs' being ready to humiliate Boris Johnson by backing it ... Daily mail

[cobourg1] 28/9/2020 14:00

Coming close to Yank time.

Wot they going to do?

Inject them all with the Wuhan flu.

Chop them up like the Saudis do.

(If you don't get this see Sacha Baron Cohen's latest stunt sending up a Republican rally - YouTube).

[grahamite2] 28/9/2020 13:54

xxxxxy28 Sep '20 - 13:17 - 315643 of 315653
0 1 0
Genuine Wilful Sprite 28 Sep 2020 12:55PM

Hoyle has rejected the Brady amendment.

I have been unable to confirm this.

[cobourg1] 28/9/2020 13:53

Footsie up to 2.04%. Lloyds up 6.6%. That makes a pleasant change.

[k38] 28/9/2020 13:52

Should the taxpayers "save" the football clubs from their (profits) losses?From me it's a NO! Their income has been reduced almost half, 46%...It's time for them to cut the players salaries in half and freeze them for 5 years before even think to ask for help. And.. stop paying huge amounts on a new buy.. they don't worth a penny. Useless lot!

[lefrene] 28/9/2020 13:49

xxxxxy, It looks obvious to me that the exercise going on is a deliberate wrecking of an economy (160 imf dollar dependants included), I believe that the repo-market freezing up on 17-9-19 was the start of it, as the $680 trillion derivatives market ran over the cliff. Since then we have unprecedented buying by the FED of bonds, ETF's and shares, effectively giving $ trillions to what would otherwise be bust banks.

There has to be a whipping boy to explain away the wreckage. A virus that could easily be contained with vitamin D and hydroxychloroquine, plus sheltering the over 70's, is instead being quite deliberately hyped up, even though the death levels amongst healthy normal people is utterly trivial.

My guess is that once the USA election is over, the virus will magically decline, but all manner of things in the financial sphere will alter 'to pay for the virus recovery'. What is disturbing is just how easily sheeple can be herded by propaganda, despite the internet providing swathes of evidence that this 'pandemic' is nothing of the sort.

[jimarilo] 28/9/2020 13:42

The Brady vote apparently would not be legal ? dear oh dear

However, there is a court case coming....Simon Dolan is taking the government to court

[meek] 28/9/2020 13:37

That's the beauty of debate, some people side one way, you sway the other. I personally would like, to at the very least, have the right to decide the myself.

[jimarilo] 28/9/2020 13:34

Is there a link re: Lindsay Hoyle ?

[geckotheglorious] 28/9/2020 13:31

meek,

Ah, wasn't sure.

No worries.

There are plenty of sides to the argument, don't dispute that.

Common sense says masks reduce viral load because they stop the distance and concentration your cough/sneeze particles travel..

I cant see why the likes of XXXXY cannot accept this.

[geckotheglorious] 28/9/2020 13:29

"Get those dirty germ ridden masks on people"

Wash those dirty hands and wipe away all the germs/snot you sneeze every where - on surfaces, on food packets(that you then put back on the shelves)

So what if it isnt as fatal as it was.

The long term sequeli that those who recover from it are appallingly bad as well.

Still, you keep running all the risks. I care not.

I most certainly do not want to catch this myself, nor do I want to inadvertently give it to someone else..

FYI

Dirty masks easily kept clean (and spring/summer leave it in the sun!)



"Some people wear them for 2 days in a row. They must be microbe infested germ spreaders and not just for WuFlu. TB comes to mind"

I've worn mine every day for 2 weeks when I've gone out.

MSD Advantage with decent P100 filter.
Stuck it in the sun when not wearing it - and a quick alcohol wipe on the inside 10 mins before I put it on..

Sunlight kills most germs / viruses fyi