Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[diku] 14/6/2019 10:23

He may be looking for a PR stunt to be the next labour leader...

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 10:22

Whatever. Who cares?

LOL

[diku] 14/6/2019 10:21

How many times has Chukka jumped ship...a bit like a Nomad!...

[shy tott] 14/6/2019 10:21

438

But chukka switched from his Change uk party, previously the independent party, to join the libdems. His labour adventures are well in the past.

So you're really saying that the libdems are a better fit for him than the party he formed!.

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 10:19

diku

Their MP is still the same person with the same values.

It is the Labour party that has shifted, not Chukka!

If you happen to be a party tribes person from the dark ages then that is your fault.

[diku] 14/6/2019 10:16

So the labour voters who voted for Chukka are indirectly Lib Dems now...all this Party beliefs are mis placed...

[maxk] 14/6/2019 10:15

Alarm bells going off...



‘There is increasing talk among senior figures in the party that if the former Foreign Secretary comes out on top in the parliamentary rounds, it would be best to skip the members part of the contest and make him Prime Minister straight away.

The argument goes that the polling shows that Johnson is the members’ choice, and so they wouldn’t mind him being crowned.

Also, by ending the contest early, the new Prime Minister would have a chance to get cracking on Brexit.’

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 10:13

LOL

The clown is out of bed.

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 10:10

"Like the Tories have their leader chosen by a handful of jam-making little Englanders"

ROFLMAO!

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 10:09

Glad to see Chukka join the Libs!

Welcome!

[grahamite2] 14/6/2019 10:04

Crossing - a small clarification. They weren't "my American contacts" - it was a website quite like this one, with contributors from right and left. I was just passing on the way the left viewed it there - people who have probably never heard of Jo Brand and who wouldn't therefore make the automatic assumption that "she's famous, she couldn't be inciting violence."

I didn't begin to anticipate that Minerve would come right out with it and support such incitement.

[shy tott] 14/6/2019 10:03

Lade, this chukka bloke used to sit very high in my opinion and I thought he was politically impressive.


Now he sits very low and is just political.

[alphorn] 14/6/2019 09:59

ST #434. Good summary. A key issue is consistency with others; often difficult to achieve.

[alphorn] 14/6/2019 09:51

jacko #410. "it hardly changes"

That is a nonsense.

You will note my posts on other threads about a rare 'one way bet' opportunity and in round terms it has moved 1.17 to 1.12 in about six weeks, and yes, these are large allocations/positions.

I agree that there could be some snap back and I have 'suggested' possible reversal points on my thread.

………;……now please do something to get ITV back in the land of the living!

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 09:49

Sorry if some of you don't like it but that is the way it is.

Best get used to it old, privileged white men.

[minerve 2] 14/6/2019 09:47

The charlatans, the greedy, the selfish and self-serving cannot continue like they are without the increasing chances of a severe backlash. People have had enough.

When are you privileged dinosaurs going to wake up?

[crossing_the_rubicon] 14/6/2019 09:47

Re Jo Bland

Whether or not it was incitement or not, Bland must face the full force of the law - just as Count Dankula risibly had to.

Consistency.

Have to be consistent. Just because she is an obese vulgar unfunny water buffalo doesn't mean she should get special treatment. After all Count Dankula didnt and he is Scottish.

Personally I'd have allowed both of them to carry on with their "comedy sketches" unrestricted. For that is Freedom of Speech.

More importantly would the BBC and Jo Bland find it funny if someone took her literally and threw battery acid over Jo Bland???

Suspect not.