![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iofina Plc | LSE:IOF | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B2QL5C79 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.50 | -2.20% | 22.25 | 21.50 | 23.00 | 22.75 | 22.25 | 22.75 | 44,256 | 09:26:01 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offices-holdng Companies,nec | 42.2M | 7.87M | 0.0410 | 5.43 | 43.65M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/2/2015 17:11 | Sigh* Come on ACT, if you want to play predictions, stick to your football, you did advise buying at 220p, a £220m stock with £30m losses this year and more losses last year. Do you not remember your last chart prediction *sigh* because I do: Arlington Chetwynd Talbot - 03 Feb 2015 - 21:34:18 - 29369 of 29698 Next stop here is 26.5p; | ![]() che7win | |
12/2/2015 17:09 | My lines are not wrong, and where is the gap @56? All gaps have been filled on that chart? Haven't they? | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 17:05 | Heartwell had the chart upside down , makes sense now | stevo2011 | |
12/2/2015 17:05 | No, I said it was worth buying at 220p, didn't I? And it's 206 now? It closed at 222 yesterday? When did you ask me if it was still worth buying? Today? | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 17:03 | Your lines are all wrong on that chart, at least you show the gap at 56p. | ![]() che7win | |
12/2/2015 17:00 | Always a tad suspicious of a tiny break above a line of falling resistance, might be some mileage yet if you clear it. free stock charts from uk.advfn.com | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 17:00 | You also said that you added to your short here, was that at 30p? | ![]() che7win | |
12/2/2015 17:00 | ACT, nonsense, you advised me to buy TUNG at 220p recently, I asked you was it a still a buy when it went below and you went all quiet. | ![]() che7win | |
12/2/2015 16:54 | Okay, I'll re-visit the charts... sigh | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 16:52 | We're not far off. A jump to 50 would be significant, and then maybe buy the retrace if it holds support. | ![]() brucie5 | |
12/2/2015 16:51 | I mean be fair, if I'd said TUNG was okay @float and it had tanked you would have a case. But you haven't, so shut up. LOL | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 16:50 | Look, I never ramped TUNG, said it was okay @float, said it got to high. There was a good profit to be had. I'm no Graham LOL | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 16:41 | Looks like shorts being pulled up by small gamblers to me just in case news is favourable, but then I did top at 70p, marvellous. | ![]() beeezzz | |
12/2/2015 16:38 | nuts , what happened to TUNG? | ![]() neddo | |
12/2/2015 16:33 | Timing is not always my forte and I suffer from cognitive bias, like many others. Time to be buying this was indeed at 30p and not 38/40. Alternatively, on the BO, once it gets above the 40 resistance, for disciplined chartists. There is still one clear risk re. the expected water judgment, but the research in depth on this bb taken together with the BRR interviews have convinced me that the balance of probabilities lies in a strong recovery of the sp, which was 60p in quite recent time. Not one I would bet the farm on, but a good investment likely as not, at a good time to be invested. NAI! | ![]() brucie5 | |
12/2/2015 16:31 | Base? Erm, yes, more than likely we'll see some profits taken from the above average volumes (that Graham doesn't know how to header). | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 16:28 | I thought you call @30 was an excellent one Brucie. | arlington chetwynd talbot | |
12/2/2015 16:24 | I topped up again at 38 today. Should have done so at the recent 30p low, but convinced the share price is going to blow through the 40 on decent news. And then then the long awaited strategic review. What's the betting there will be a further down leg first, to confirm the base... | ![]() brucie5 | |
12/2/2015 16:13 | It's a cheap carry out. Looking at FXPO today, see if I can add desert. | ![]() che7win | |
12/2/2015 16:10 | Something's brewing..... not a good time to be short | ![]() bocker01 | |
12/2/2015 14:00 | Closer to home than that. | freshvoice | |
12/2/2015 13:43 | Personally I don't think the objector has a leg to stand on, though funnier things have happened hence uncertainty. The price has been where it is as people are probably fed up and lost interest, personally I can't understand why not in mid 40's which is where I expect to see it settle down to after following rises into next week. If you run your numbers over this even with and without water the price should not be here. Iodine price pretty low so any rise over the year will have major impact on the price and valuation of this company. The company is making money and isn't going broke so there is no speculation really just apathy as to why the price is where it is. If you run a slide rule over this its a good buy. | ![]() octopus100 | |
12/2/2015 13:36 | Bogg1eOff topic I'm meeting Physcho in windsor Friday 27th Feb for beers . Do you want to join us ? | ![]() dcgray21 | |
12/2/2015 13:30 | Come on SG don't be coy about this "discovery" of yours... let us know what it is, we're big boys and able to make our own assessment of its importance... | ![]() cyberbub |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions