ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

CLTV Cellcast Plc

1.25
0.00 (0.00%)
18 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cellcast Plc LSE:CLTV London Ordinary Share GB00B0GWFM68 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 1.25 1.00 1.50 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Cellcast Share Discussion Threads

Showing 4876 to 4900 of 7425 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  201  200  199  198  197  196  195  194  193  192  191  190  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/3/2009
07:19
21st Century Liar,

No, just like it didn't raise funds at the end of 2008, like you said it would either. It's in a better position than your WLW too ;-)

You're a liar, fraud and all-round useless filth...

ldmachin
10/3/2009
23:53
Good morning from Chang Mai, Thailand.

Has it been suspeneded yet, pending clarification of it's financial position?

21st century media company
10/3/2009
13:08
Can we arrange for the last 2 posters to meet in a field somewhere and throw sh#te at each other .
That way we might get the bb back into sensible hands and get a meaningfull discussion going .

h d shoring
10/3/2009
13:02
You must be mad to listen to 21st Century Liar more like... a fraudster and all round low-life with less Credibility than Peter Mandleson.
ldmachin
10/3/2009
12:26
rascalhardin - 19 Jan'09 - 13:32 - 11 of 11

You must alll be mad to invest in a company that has Mike Neville on the board. Look at the WTV, MNT, FLX and Crucial Plan threads and see what the investors there think of Mike Neville.

Watch out particularly for disposals of subsidiary companies to anonymous "high profile investors" as happened at WTV when Mike Neville was there. WTV has now delisted from AIM and investors are unable to sell their shares.

MNT shares have been suspended following massive transfers of resources out of the company and numerous breaches of Stock Exchange regulations. Both WTV and MNT shareholders have started Action Groups. MNT investors have already referred their complaints to the Serious Fraud Office and WTV investors will soon refer their case to the SFO.

21st century media company
09/3/2009
22:38
the analyst,

Yes, those were the audited accounts... but they gave a trading update on 20th March 2008:

ldmachin
09/3/2009
22:35
Last year's results were out at the end of June.
the analyst
09/3/2009
22:22
stefanos2,

He did well a few years ago with the likes of QXL. But since then he's hit hard times... LNG, CLTV, BGT, MEA, etc...

... he regularly sells LNG to increase his personal liquidity.

So, to some extent, if he was unhappy with Cellcast and was desperate for his investment to do well... i'm sure he would be screaming blue murder at the management if he thought they were up to no good... or at the very least, sell and get any price for his stake... which he hasn't. I believe he has in excess of £500k invested in CLTV, so, he should by all rights, be watching the company like a hawk.

Can't be too much longer before we get the 2008 results and a trading update, surely.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
22:19
LDM,

How do you rate Neil Craven for his analytical expertise in selecting companies to invest in?

Do you have great respect for him? Has he shown great investing prowess during these tough times? Can he assess the ability of a company to run its business and does he know to ask all the right questions so he doesn't make bad investment mistakes?

stefanos2
09/3/2009
22:13
stefanos2,

One saving grace in that respect is that independent private investor Neil Craven (approx 20% holder) is fully aware of all the inter-company dealings and is happy with them.

But, yes, management could do a lot better in clarity of dealings. Updating www.cellcast.com to show the current business would be a good start. It's years out of date and most of it irrelevent now.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
22:00
It's just a sad fact that investors now look at any company that has a relationship with Cellcast and presume there must be something dodgy going on between them. Either management, shareholders or the old boys network, or whatever.

The management here have a huge amount of repair to do.

Can they be 'bovvered' to do that or will they take the administration and asset buy-back route?

stefanos2
09/3/2009
21:59
the analyst,

The management team are different.

and they have a different registered address.

If Cellcast directors had positions/interests in Square1 it would have to be stated... AIM Rule 26 i believe.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
21:53
Do you know about the owners of Square1, LDM?

Are they connected to Cellcast?

I guess that unless they are publicly quoted, it would be impossible to know. Getting the annual report from Companies House would probably not help in determining who the major shareholders are

the analyst
09/3/2009
21:44
stefanos2,

"Are the management of Square 1, by chance, the same people heading-up Cellcast?"

- Using your brain for 2 mintues, you would have been able to see that the management team of Square 1 are different from that of Cellcast:

ldmachin
09/3/2009
21:39
Well, it really does look like another one of those typical Cellcast situations

Yet again, we have no idea what is going on.

Are the management of Square 1, by chance, the same people heading-up Cellcast? If so, what are they being paid for their roles at square 1? Is that money coming from Cellcast? We need to know EVERYTHING about each of these mysterious companies that are getting revenue from Cellcast.





Off Topic:
LDM, 21C: After reading your pathetic, non-stop bickering, I am sure you have both given yourselves absolutely no chance of getting that 'credibility' you so crave. It would take a year of good posting without this tripe to rid yourself of the 'pathetic' and 'sad' tags you have created for yourselves. Just grow up and get on with investing and discussing investment, PLEASE!

stefanos2
09/3/2009
21:06
Recto Verso,

No, it's all a mis-mash, management need to be a hell of a lot more transparent with this regard, especially as they have interests in companies that Cellcast deal with.

"Cellcast stated in 2006 that they HAVE SECURED bandwidth on Freeview ?!?"

- As i stated before, surely this is just their output on Smile TV 1 (their party people programme). It doesn't say they own the channel, they have just secured the rights to broadcast their programming on it via Square1.

You can see how Cellcast have 'partnered' with Square1:

"WHAT DO WE DO?

We provide a range of premium-rate, network telephony services. By partnering with our customers we help them generate additional revenue from content they already own, and closely support them with fantastic billing and reporting systems that tell them where and when they are making money."



Maybe reading this will help:

ldmachin
09/3/2009
20:51
Square 1 owns Channel 37 and Channel 46 on freeview and their channels are called "Smile TV" and "Smile TV2" respectively.

Now SmileTV2, channel 46, is going. As we know the contract has run out.

Although Smile TV, channel 37, remains.

SMILE TV are Cellcast brands and smile tv has been on Freeview for years. with cellcast changing the content now and again.

Cellcast stated in 2006 that they HAVE SECURED bandwidth on Freeview ?!?

WHERE HAS THIS BANDWIDTH GONE ???

WHO THE HELL ARE SQUARE1 ???

All very NON-TRANSPARENT as usual.

RV

recto verso
09/3/2009
20:45
CLTV if they has something positive to update they would have done it by now like they did in Jan 2006 and that was the last time they had something positive to report and since than u know the story......Imho.
armaan17
09/3/2009
20:35
Recto Verso,

The Smile TV channels are licensed to Square 1 Management Limited:



So, Cellcast must have had the 9 month contract with them:



That help?

ldmachin
09/3/2009
20:30
Recto Verso,

What do you mean Cellcast 'cant'?

Like i said, Cellcast haven't been booted off of Channel 46. The original 9 month contract has come to an end (the same shows are being shown on Sky and now for longer than they were before)...

... it could be that Cellcast got a bargain with the initial 9 month contract... and now it has proven successful the license costs have increased (or another company has bidder higher for the channel) making it no longer profitable for Cellcast...

... the next update from the company should give us a better understanding.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
20:28
So Cellcast can't but Channel 5 can :

New channel coming on DTT :

"Partyland"

Check out the licence details :



Partyland
Content: Adult Chat, Editorial
Licensee: Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd

????

RV

recto verso
09/3/2009
20:19
21st Century Media Company,

100% loss on WLW for you.

0% loss on CLTV for me.

Still p*ssed that i bought LNG at the bottom, 4p? While you being the mug filth you are bought at 6p+.

You are nothing as a human and as an 'investor'. It is easy to see why you envy me.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
20:16
LDM

Sticks & stones may hurt my bones but names will never hurt me.

85% LOSS on CLTV

LOL

21st century media company
09/3/2009
20:16
Recto Verso,

I assume they mean the slot on channel 37, which Cellcast broadcast Party People on from 3am till 7am if i remember rightly.

ldmachin
09/3/2009
20:13
21st Century Media Company,

You are human filth. A proven liar. Unloved by all. Good for nothing.

ldmachin
Chat Pages: Latest  201  200  199  198  197  196  195  194  193  192  191  190  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock