Burford Capital Share Discussion Threads

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 18:11

I sold out of Burford at c1850 having bought in early on.
I sold out of WPCT at c114 having bought early on.

My rationale is all there to be read and some of it reconciles with TW.

Notice a pattern developing?

The investment thesis seems more successful than most here! LOL

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 18:07

brownie69

I have nothing to do with TW other than the willingness to listen to what he has to say. ;)

[luckymouse] 19/8/2019 18:06

ba-dum tsss

[luckymouse] 19/8/2019 18:05

Sociology is actually a lovely & interesting subject...

I suppose opposites attract

[brownie69] 19/8/2019 18:03

BTW I doubt Minerve is part of the gang. Back in the day when Simon Cawkwell headed up the gang they used to introduce other members of the old T1ps gang even pretending that some of them were independent.

So watch out for Zac Mir who will be the expert technical analyst portraying more doom and gloom than Project Fear, and Lucien somebody/nobody to pontificate more bowlocks.

Meanwhile Cawky was getting out...

BTW the old T1ps crew were so successful it closed....no one renewed their subs is my guess.

Seems like TW having failed as a pizza chef is having another go. I predict the same outcome as happened to T1ps and Rivington..

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 17:53

Oh dear, poor Brownie, has he lost much money on Burford!

What a shame!

ROFLMAO!

[brownie69] 19/8/2019 17:41

What a d1ckhead you are Minerve. Filtered

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 17:31

I've no need to lie. When I make a loss I'll tell you. I have a strong enough character to accept and learn from failure. Obviously you haven't. ;)

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 17:29

getting

Would you like to wager your whole net-worth vs mine on that one?

We can get our lawyers involved and set-up escrow?

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 17:28

Have you made your losses back getting? LOL

You know your stop-losses are interfering with this getting anywhere.

The seeds of doubt have been sown. Buy low WRT forward consensus earnings and avoid incremental investment.

I've told you how to mitigate the risk here. Best learn before it's too late! ;)

[gettingrichslow] 19/8/2019 17:26

“Cashed in for a modest profit”

Of course you did!!

😂😂😂

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 17:25

Yep, I was long, cashed in for a modest profit. If people had actually taken the time to read what I wrote you would see that my actions reconcile with my words. I have better investments to follow, this was a bit of fun with the fanboys.

[gettingrichslow] 19/8/2019 17:23

jakeah, yep that’s right, Minny declared he was long just after the big surge the other day. But be in no doubt that he will have miraculously sold out at the top etc etc! He is all over the place at the moment unfortunately. And better not tell him SweetK is a Leaver either, that would really confuse him!

[winsome] 19/8/2019 17:23

Oh my god, sk. You write for free for TW and he rakes in the cash. Then you believe that neither he nor his close friends or relatives make money from shorting the companies he writes about. You are a mug LOL! No one in this business is virtous.

You call us naive and accuse us of making these insinuations without proof yet you guys make the same about others. The hypocrisy knows no bounds.

[jakeah1175] 19/8/2019 17:17

Didn't Minerve declare itself as long the other day? Maybe cashed in at £2 up after dealing fees.

[johnwig] 19/8/2019 17:17

It's always very funny. Somebody mentions morons and up pops Minerve2!

[gettingrichslow] 19/8/2019 17:06

And there you have it people. As if the incessant drivel from SweetK, repeated hour after hour, day after day wasn’t painful enough, we now have ‘Minerve’; supporting her! For those that are unaware this is the poster who wishes brain tumours on people on ADVFN. And laughs at people who had still-born babies. All true I’m afraid. They say you can judge people by the company they keep and this confirms what I already concluded, here are two very toxic people...

[minerve 2] 19/8/2019 16:47

Keep posting sweet. Morons will have to suck it and/or provide better argument.

[sweet karolina2] 19/8/2019 16:35

I have posted about the available information from all sources, some of which I have found myself, and my analysis of that information and given my opinion on the conclusions I draw from it. As new information or credible analysis has come to light, I have updated my analysis and conclusions, making clear what is not known and that it remains my opinion.

Some have contributed to that, but most have just tried to distract from it and drown it out.

I have made what I consider to be a compelling prima facie case, which any judge in the free world would issue search / arrest warrants on. I am not able to prove anything and the 4 hypotheses posted at 10888 remain credible. Investors have a choice between using what I have posted for their own research and analysis to inform their own investing decisions and ignoring it. Ultimately only they can take responsibility for their own investing decisions.

I will continue to update on receipt of any new info and comment on the situation as I am perfectly entitled to do, eg if BUR were to answer the questions re Napo it has been asked. However, it is the responsibility of the authorities to get to the truth and bring charges as appropriate - that will not be a quick process. However, If I were SFO, and I am most definitely not, the first person I would interview under caution would be Miriam Connole, not because I believe she is most culpable but because I believe she is most likely to genuinely assist with the inquiry, but again that is just my opinion.