Burford Capital Share Chat (BUR)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Burford Capital Limited	LSE:BUR	London	Ordinary Share	GG00B4L84979	ORD NPV

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	-20.00p	-1.79%	1,095.00p	1,092.00p	1,100.00p	1,122.00p	1,072.00p	1,112.00p	270,675	16:35:21

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Equity Investment Instruments	59.0	46.1	21.4	47.2	2,239.77

Burford Capital Share Discussion Threads

Showing 21851 to 21874 of 21875 messages

Chat Pages: 875 874 873 872 871 870 869 868 867 866 865 864 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
23/9/2017 00:58	Do any of y'all have a strong opinion on the prospect of mandatory disclosure of litigation finance agreements in U.S. federal courts? Australia, New Zealand, parts of Canada, China, and Hong Kong currently have disclosure requirements and the litigation finance industry seems to function perfectly well in those jurisdictions. The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform recently renewed their proposal to amend Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A) to require mandatory disclosure of litigation funding agreements to opposing parties as a matter of course. See: hxxp://www.almcms.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2017/06/Proposal-to-Amend-Rule-26-for-Third-Party-Litigation-Funding-Disclosure.pdf Proposals to amend the FRCP are frequent but seldom acted upon by the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure. However, Chris Bogart saw the need to respond to their proposal on behalf of Burford. He posits Burford's arguments against the Chamber's points, but fails to explain his rationale for being against mandatory disclosure. See: hxxp://www.burfordcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2017-09-01-Burford-Comment-to-Advisory-Committe-on-Civil-Rules.pdf What adverse effects could disclosure have on the litigation funding industry? If agreements were made public, would it allow more for more precise valuations of companies like Burford and IMF Bentham? Could it potentially cause wild swings in share price? Other thoughts?	lawdawg759	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 18:44	Acamas - please don't let one poster (or even many) put you off! On the whole, this board is pretty collaborative with views exchanged in a civil manner. Your simplest course would be to filter anyone who fails to engage you in a civilised manner, or to contribute anything but bile. That's what I do pretty ruthlessly!	jonwig	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 18:40	Acamas dont be chased off over one poster ,you have to go back to early august to find a positive post from him and since then his only posts have confrontational to anyone that has an opinion different from his or a chartist with an opinion.this board is for everyone . best of luck if you do go.	bolstaf	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 18:03	trident5, Good luck to your purchase at £3. Ok I will not post anymore on this board. I lose nothing by that approach but if you chase off the board all posters that hold a different approach to the one you hold. Life will become very boring when you are all holding a similar opinion Thank you for being so kind and welcoming	acamas	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 15:17	trident5 I took out the channel that gave 1301p and replaced it with another channel which showed stronger potential and offered a ceiling of 1370p. Lets see what the future brings. You can always filter my odd post Anyone who knows my posts is aware that I do not mislead ramp or deramp shares. I just give my honest opinion. Nor do I ever seek confrontation	acamas	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 13:24	Acamas - it was 1301p a couple of days ago - sort yourself out, make up your mind and stop misleading everyone here	trident5	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 13:11	If we can bounce from this level then the next ceiling has got stronger and sits at 1370p bwdik	acamas	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 11:14	Looks that way nimbo, and a very bullish bounce. Let's see if we can continue and break through 1160, which would be decisive.	mad foetus	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 09:44	I'm out moved against me too quickly, got my timing wrong. and probably did with the quick sell as well lol!	nimbo1	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 08:17	The drop off in volume is pretty striking as well. It obviously has to break out one way or another pretty soon.	mad foetus	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 08:06	hi mf, posted for a combination of factors. I can't use my main computer over next few days, only mobile, so limited access to Java based charts unless I post a screenshot. Waiting for the breakout. Possible [2x] turns 26 Sept. Patterns like this can double bust.	bamboo2	Read Full Thread Reply
22/9/2017 04:57	Thanks bamboo but it is hard to ignore! I'm looking at the green and seeing a symmetrical triangle and we know what that means, don't we? (LOL!)PM me if you don't want to fill the board with telling me I'm wrong.	mad foetus	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 22:33	Well if we have to ignore your crayon art why put it on here? Why don't you just say you're no longer buying the dips, because watching the dips is less costly?	trident5	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 22:07	Please ignore for now, working copy only.	bamboo2	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 18:53	Thx JW - riddled with estimates translates to "we have no idea how they work" lol	panic investor	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 17:51	Http://www.investorschampion.com/	jonwig	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 17:47	Have I missed something here chaps ?	panic investor	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 17:42	Hi Jonwig do you have a link to the article?	nimbo1	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 17:18	Steptoe - their argument is non-trivial and based on the numbers in the accounts. I haven't had time to look closely at it, and may contact them when I have.	jonwig	Read Full Thread Reply
21/9/2017 12:06	Or they could just continue to exceed earnings expectations. We shall see.	steptoes yard	Read Full Thread Reply
20/9/2017 12:49	invchamp - they make such warnings themselves, often! EDIT: I was going to suggest "Tell us more", and you do, for a price. Maybe I ought to bite.	jonwig	Read Full Thread Reply
20/9/2017 12:28	Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This might be a case of a share that appears too good to be true, and is. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and while Burford apparently hasn’t put a foot wrong yet, this is likely to be an instance where the warning about past performance’s tenuous relationship with future performance is particularly apt!	investorschampion	Read Full Thread Reply
20/9/2017 12:03	nimbo1, Good Luck	acamas	Read Full Thread Reply
20/9/2017 10:54	joined you in here today. Hoping for a break to the upside following your chart discussions! Watched for far too long.	nimbo1	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 875 874 873 872 871 870 869 868 867 866 865 864 Older