Burford Capital Share Discussion Threads

[lionheart69uk1] 19/8/2019 10:17

FFS 1corrado you are like a bloody stuck record. Get a life.

[winsome] 19/8/2019 10:14

1corrado, which way is the wind blowing where you are now and which way will it be blowing in half an hour?

[thedisciplinedinvestor] 19/8/2019 10:14

In case you have any doubts

Burford H1 2019 report page 8 note 6

we have been marking Jaguar stock to market each period on our income statement

[brownie69] 19/8/2019 10:13

By the way, like Toms other business ventures the real Man Pizza company failed.

Listen to him and his cronies at your peril.

[1corrado] 19/8/2019 10:12

750 coming at any time now...................

[1corrado] 19/8/2019 10:06

could it go below 700p??????????????????/

[winsome] 19/8/2019 10:02

brownie, I don't follow Shareprophets so that comes as a big shock but no surprise. So TW actually built his own QUENRON?

People actually pay to read what he says? Pls forward me his buy tips. I'll short them.

By any chance has he ever recommended Manx Financial, run by Jim Mellon. I looked that them a while back but Mellon was taking huge fees out of such a small company.

[1corrado] 19/8/2019 09:51

750p coming soon.

[winsome] 19/8/2019 09:47

adnan, you are forgetting that MW at no point contacted BUR for clarification and the MW report was not interested in facts, just profiteering from panic. Much of it has already been discredited, especially the headline point that they are insolvent.

[1corrado] 19/8/2019 09:47

750 coming soon.

[winsome] 19/8/2019 09:44

TDI, fair point but none of the big institutional investors have sold either and they are all well in profit even with the big fall in share price

To me its a hold until the dust settles a bit more and the mud flinging stops.

[adnan17] 19/8/2019 09:41

In MW's original research report, why did they not mention Napo v Glenmark?

Did they not know how to use google? Did they not know how to type "Napo Settlement 2013" into Google? Were they using Netscape or Vista? How did they not assess such basic stuff?

The fact that they "thoroughly" analysed the Napo case for 2013 and did not even mention or know about Napo v Glenmark goes to show how amateur the whole research piece was.

Case closed!!!

[winsome] 19/8/2019 09:41

bbms, you've well and truly earned the Filter button this morning. Bye...

[thedisciplinedinvestor] 19/8/2019 09:40

No buyers in Burford at all.... Where are the buybacks??? We need instutional investors coming in because retail investors are so scared that they are not buying at all. All the bulls are only writting in this blog. They have to put their money where their mouth is and buy more. BUy, BUY and BUY. Tomorrow when any announcement is made it will be to late. You make serious money buying today, not when the stock is up 50%

[winsome] 19/8/2019 09:39

sk, go do some proper journalism and go ask BUR for comment. Come back and tell us what they say. Even the Daily friggin Mail always ask for quotes from the other side before printing.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 19/8/2019 09:37

winsome
19 Aug '19 - 09:32 - 11584 of 11585
0 2 0
bbms, "What's it like being stupid?"

Thank you once again for proving you've lost the argument with name calling.

It's a genuine question mate.

[winsome] 19/8/2019 09:32

bbms, "What's it like being stupid?"

Thank you once again for proving you've lost the argument with name calling.

[adnan17] 19/8/2019 09:32

Agree dgdg

Also if you recall the whole MW thesis was Napo v Salix. It did not mention Glenmark at all. But Burford destroyed the whole Napo v Salix issue and now they are invented a new issue.

Each time you destroy an issue they will invent a new one. Its the way the game works. Management do have a multi-billion dollar business to run. Have you forgotten that?

[bbmsionlypostafter] 19/8/2019 09:29

So defeat them once & for all by addressing the Napo question.

Duh.