ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

BP. Bp Plc

457.30
-1.70 (-0.37%)
19 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Bp Plc LSE:BP. London Ordinary Share GB0007980591 $0.25
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.70 -0.37% 457.30 456.25 456.40 460.00 454.65 457.80 23,647,197 16:35:16
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Petroleum Refining 211.6B 15.24B 0.9077 5.03 77.06B
Bp Plc is listed in the Petroleum Refining sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BP.. The last closing price for Bp was 459p. Over the last year, Bp shares have traded in a share price range of 441.10p to 562.20p.

Bp currently has 16,788,710,799 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Bp is £77.06 billion. Bp has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.03.

Bp Share Discussion Threads

Showing 86426 to 86448 of 111500 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  3464  3463  3462  3461  3460  3459  3458  3457  3456  3455  3454  3453  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
04/9/2014
16:56
I hope BP didn't buy back 3 million shares this morning and buys back 6 million tomorrow at 30p per share less.

Probably had to buy back at the usual 9am to 10am today or it would have looked as if expected the gross neg to be awarded against it

Anyway it will get a load more shares tomorrow, to cancel, for it's pounds.

I'm in for £10k more if it drops another 5% tomorrow

robertfaulkner
04/9/2014
16:31
BP strongly disagrees with the decision issued today by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and will immediately appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.



BP believes that the finding that it was grossly negligent with respect to the accident and that its activities at the Macondo well amounted to willful misconduct is not supported by the evidence at trial. The law is clear that proving gross negligence is a very high bar that was not met in this case. BP believes that an impartial view of the record does not support the erroneous conclusion reached by the District Court.



The Court has not yet ruled on the number of barrels spilled and no penalty has yet been determined. The District Court will hold additional proceedings, which are currently scheduled to begin in January 2015, to consider the application of statutory penalty factors in assessing a per-barrel Clean Water Act penalty. The Clean Water Act requires the District Court to consider a number of factors in determining an appropriate penalty. The statutory maximum penalty is $1,100 per barrel where the court finds simple negligence and $4,300 per barrel where the court finds gross negligence or willful misconduct. During the penalty proceedings, BP will seek to show that its conduct merits a penalty that is less than the applicable maximum after application of the statutory factors.



BP is reviewing the decision and will issue a further statement as soon as possible.

neilyb675
04/9/2014
16:29
Down another 5% tomorrow.
montyhedge
04/9/2014
16:28
BP strongly disagrees with the decision issued today by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and will immediately appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

BP believes that the finding that it was grossly negligent with respect to the accident and that its activities at the Macondo well amounted to willful misconduct is not supported by the evidence at trial. The law is clear that proving gross negligence is a very high bar that was not met in this case. BP believes that an impartial view of the record does not support the erroneous conclusion reached by the District Court.

The Court has not yet ruled on the number of barrels spilled and no penalty has yet been determined. The District Court will hold additional proceedings, which are currently scheduled to begin in January 2015, to consider the application of statutory penalty factors in assessing a per-barrel Clean Water Act penalty. The Clean Water Act requires the District Court to consider a number of factors in determining an appropriate penalty. The statutory maximum penalty is $1,100 per barrel where the court finds simple negligence and $4,300 per barrel where the court finds gross negligence or willful misconduct. During the penalty proceedings, BP will seek to show that its conduct merits a penalty that is less than the applicable maximum after application of the statutory factors.

BP is reviewing the decision and will issue a further statement as soon as possible.

skinny
04/9/2014
16:26
Bit of a laugh really Haliburton get away with a piddling fine even though they willfully destroyed evidence , oh i forgot they are american .
holts
04/9/2014
16:24
monty - you say the same on every thread ref dividend, lol
neilyb675
04/9/2014
16:22
Bang goes the dividend.
montyhedge
04/9/2014
16:19
Skinny

Not so much "overlooked" as buried.

But look on the bright side............cheaper for BP to buy back own shares........if they can afford to!

bracke
04/9/2014
16:16
its certainly a good day again for the lawyers who are going to continue to feast on this for years to come ! It would be good to know what American legal firms are making the most out of the this to buy shares in !!!

The American judge is clearly very biased against BP.
Seems to me many businsses in the area affected by the spill
made a fortune out of this and it was a complete bonanza for them
in compensation claims. Seems to me no-one lost money out of
it apary from BP of course.

Obvioulsy the families of the people who lost their lives
are the ones who should benefit the most. Seems to me the judge
is favouring an awful lot of fraudulent claims and legal sharks.

johnmfrancis
04/9/2014
16:15
Overlooked -
skinny
04/9/2014
16:12
....''a good divi earner -------but for how long'' !!????
emeraldzebra
04/9/2014
16:12
Here's the link



Perhaps we should hold Obama to ransom has he is in the UK.

skinny
04/9/2014
16:08
interesting days ahead
neilyb675
04/9/2014
16:08
What!? $50bn TO???
alexios1201
04/9/2014
16:07
BP are the most responsible.
bracke
04/9/2014
16:07
Taking a long term view if we get a run on the share price back down
to the sub £4 levels its going to be a good time to accumulate some more.

I believe one day we will see this back around £7 levels but not
for a few years unless we get a major spike in oil prices which of
course could happen. In the meantime just look to accumlate as a
good dividend earner.

johnmfrancis
04/9/2014
16:05
What are they trying to do destroy the company or weaken for a takeover?
2hoggy
04/9/2014
16:04
a perfect storm.
at least my bp. holding helps me forget my supermarket woes.

careful
04/9/2014
16:02
Not much of a surprise here.

Lets see how this progresses and what the fine
acutally ends up being and then we can
perhaps see an end to the uncertainty overhanging
the company. Once we can see a "worst financial case" position
which BP can then spend several more years legally
arging over as its quite entitled to due to the
injust way its been treated at least then a potential
predator like Exxon may reconsider a possible takeover / merge
for tax inversion reasons.

It would certainly serve the USA right if it were to lose
a hefy chunk of Corporate Tax revenue if this were to happen.

johnmfrancis
04/9/2014
16:00
i almost forgot, BP. have struck a deal with putin.
we are lucky not to be having air strikes against us.

careful
04/9/2014
16:00
Wow, yanks trying to hit BP again bigtime..
montyhedge
04/9/2014
15:59
BP 67% ,Transocean 30% and Halliburton 3%
pineapple1
04/9/2014
15:58
transocean managed the rig, Halliburton sealed the well, Cameron supplied the emergency valve shut off systems.

BP. owned the rig so and American law seems to want to bankrupt them for employing (at great expense) three incompetent American sub contractors.

careful
Chat Pages: Latest  3464  3463  3462  3461  3460  3459  3458  3457  3456  3455  3454  3453  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock