ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

AVN Avanti Communications Group Plc

0.0526
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Avanti Communications Group Plc LSE:AVN London Ordinary Share GB00B1VCNQ84 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.0526 0.05 0.10 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Avanti Communications Share Discussion Threads

Showing 12576 to 12595 of 19600 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  508  507  506  505  504  503  502  501  500  499  498  497  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
05/9/2012
19:34
That is a plastic bath tub.

Pathetic.


No taste or class.


but there again you are anorak.

restassured
05/9/2012
19:10
Your best post yet rest.

Any prize on the top shelf, Sir.

A major improvement in content especially the 'You gotta be prepared to lose money,to make money' bit. We're singing from the same hymn sheet here me old mucker. As for the rest it's just subjective opinion. And I can't call you a liar there . . .

But re the earlier post that was a lie and my asking for evidence - I have enquired several times:

. . . . have you considered my several requests to you for some evidence of these two posts of yours?

'So far so wrong'. here on 17 Aug'12 - 08:59 - 242 of 275

or one of the lies I accused you of (the specific lie being the 298p bit) -

'You were predicting 298p then a day or two later you are a buyer. Are you completely insane? Or just losing your memory?' on yorgi's board, 21 Aug'12 - 08:57 - 10260 of 10316,

As I've said before, I will repost these two items every time you re-appear here.

And now we have your further nonsensical post to do with editing where you accuse me of editing but don't say what.

Once a liar always a liar eh.

But really rest, this is not fair on me or on other posters who like me, won't take you seriously if there's no substance to your posts.

Nevertheless, brownie points for the improvement with the earlier post at 17:00-ish.

By the way, I'll replace the post I removed last night (that's post 329 and the one I think maybe troubling you re editing) coz I may have been wrong in my assertion that you saw it in the hour or so after I posted it and before I thought better of it and took it down.

I removed it, by the way, because I didn't want to be seen to be gloating or anything like that. But since no one else seems interested (and why would they be) in our little exchange of opinions it's really just between you and I and I'm quite happy to gloat at you. So you go have a lookie.

johncsimpson
05/9/2012
13:49
VOLVO: W H A T ? ? ? ?

Added: Answered that one once

Added / edited again at 15:50 possibly 15:55 by the time I've finished - For restassured: took out a question mark, inserted a colon made a further addition, noted VOLVO hadn't cleared up his 68k purchase - now definitely down 10% and possibly more.

So, some advice VOLVO - always buy in tranches. I call it cost pound averaging. But then perhaps you did in which case you're more than 10% down.

Do try and clear this up for me or I won't sleep tonight. And do use charts; that way you wouldn't be nursing this paper loss.

johncsimpson
05/9/2012
13:42
lol, Richard Head.
volvo
05/9/2012
11:11
Easy to edit your posts as you did last night.

You fool nobody except yourself.

restassured
05/9/2012
10:41
That's probably one of the reasons most of us don't invest in funds.
sg31
05/9/2012
10:34
Quiet today restassured and VOLVO. I'm assuming you were still around last night when I posted 329.

That shut you up didn't it?

Added at 10 43: Currently watching FOGL as it retraces to the mid 70s (Currently 87.5ish).

johncsimpson
04/9/2012
22:06
Had an interesting chat with a Chinese fellow who called himself an "analyst".

Most of it went over my head, but the general gyst was that he writes programmes that produce "models" that advise fund managers which stocks and shares to invest in.

His opinion was that Fund Managers don't make decisions any more, they follow these "models".


Can't see that this bodes well for Avanti with our chequered history.
We need some brave fund managers to chuck the "models" in the bin and start using their brains.

buck581
04/9/2012
21:07
Removed on 11 September . . . Bit like tidying up your desk ahead of leaving the office for the final time.
johncsimpson
04/9/2012
20:17
To anyone else out there who reads this thread, is there anybody who agrees with these two bigoted nonentities or anyone else who would care to offer an opinion?
johncsimpson
04/9/2012
20:15
Evening restassured me old mucker. Hope you're in rude health.

Long time no hear from but then I did say that every time you posted here, I'd repeat my requests for some evidence re two of your previous posts making assertions against some of my posts. I'll just cut and paste said assertions because I can't be bothered re-phrasing and I'm ignoring your current post other than to say it could well come back to haunt you.

So here goes with the salient bits'

I asked:

. . . . have you considered my several requests to you for some evidence of these two posts of yours?

'So far so wrong'. here on 17 Aug'12 - 08:59 - 242 of 275

or one of the lies I accused you of (the specific lie being the 298p bit) -

'You were predicting 298p then a day or two later you are a buyer. Are you completely insane? Or just losing your memory?' on yorgi's board, 21 Aug'12 - 08:57 - 10260 of 10316,

I will repost these two items every time you re-appear here . . .

So there you go, I've re-posted them. Answers please, especially the 298p one. That was a very precise lie on your part but if it were true, of course, it would be impossible for me to deny. So go ahead and show where I said it.

I predict (and this will be another one I get right) - there's no way you'll ever come up with any evidence that I said 298p.

And I repeat, you are a liar (and that is F A C T).

johncsimpson
04/9/2012
17:34
You are a laughing stock.

You flip flop daily with your worthless charts.

Do some real research,instead of relying on unproven voodoo.


If charts do work,why are there not a hell of a lot more chartists sitting on yachts in the Carribean?


Madness is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

Duh!

restassured
04/9/2012
17:31
Chart at the end of the day.

I've taken out the triangulation pattern and the end cross over point (they're history now) and changed the red dashed support line to a solid purple line. I've also reduced the date range from three months to ten weeks. The question now is, is that 'support line' going to act as support or become future resistance?



Still not quite enough data to predict the next move and I'll repeat part of the comment I made in post 322 above but clarify the second line as follows:

The only surprise is that having retested that 346 area for the third time mid-morning and 'survived' that AVN didn't pull clear. (The fact it didn't fall through and still hasn't, is one glimmer of hope).

johncsimpson
04/9/2012
16:08
My observations and day indicators tell me this is almost certain to end the day red.

The only surprise is (and paradoxically it's the one glimmer of hope) that having retested that 346 area mid-morning and 'survived' AVN didn't pull clear.

So it's just a matter of 'how red' and then will it be below 346 . . . ?

johncsimpson
04/9/2012
12:17
Slowly edging back up now........going blue shortly in my view......not a lot maybe :-)
yorgi
04/9/2012
11:34
The 345ish support line (red dashes) is now critical. AVN has retested it about 40 mins ago (as it did on 30th and 31st Aug) but once again it didn't break through to the downward side.
johncsimpson
04/9/2012
07:37
Missed this last night - these are 'standard' candles (not Heinken Ashi). The last two are a good formation* and within my system they move AVN from 'watch and wait' to 'of interest' though still not buy. All my day indicators are negative but fine tweaking puts two of them on the cusp of going neutral.

* And not just because they've both turned blue. I'm not going into long explanations and as I've said it's all a bit on the cusp and needs further confirmation.

johncsimpson
03/9/2012
20:29
Today's screenshot at close.

Still no obvious new short term trend visible though the triangulation pattern will have run its course in the next day or two.

johncsimpson
03/9/2012
20:25
Evening VOLVO; were you back again this afternoon with another sniper / hit and run raid? Or did I miss your answers to my question in post 311? (Just to remind you, I've asked again - paragraph 7 below.

I always try to answer people's points / queries and as fully as I can; unfortunately many, like your good self, are not as courteous re mine.

So dear VOLVO your post 316 re HIBU.

I don't see what you mean here; I don't understand the 'theres your first failure' bit.

Failure??. Nope. That eludes me. I did predict the bottom incorrectly (in my defence I've only been monitoring HIBU these past three weeks) but even had I been right I've always said (go back and read my posts) they wouldn't necessarily be a buy. And I repeat, I don't hold.

You said (without actually naming them) from a list of five that I was charting, that four wouldn't be trading in 18 months and I said I thought HIBU (and only HIBU) fitted the bill. What's more and regarding this, I named HIBU specifically; except I said not trading by next year (only 3 months away) which is now looking a better call than your 18 months.

Anyway, I'll give you that as one of your four from the list of HIBU, BOR, RENE, BPC and RMP and ask you again to name the other three; or are they going to be hindsight answers sometime in the future? Or perhaps you are you thinking of takeovers? But do tell.

Also, I note re AVN on the other thread, that you said on the 30th Aug, you (quote): 'Bought another 68k recently' . . . I'm assuming that's quantity since you didn't put a £ sign in front of the number though it could equate to about 19,000 shares depending on the price if 68k was a money sum. Either way, you must be at least 5% down on paper if not nearer 10%. Not pocket money on those sorts of trades, whichever it was. Perhaps you'd care to clear that one up for me to?

johncsimpson
03/9/2012
19:57
Hello colva,

I know we've had our differences in the past but you are always very civil and I do remember you not responding to another poster who was darn right rude to you. Wish I could be so broad shouldered and forgiving.

I'll answer your question as follows: both the MAs and MACD are very short term 'calibrations' - but I've always said this. They're designed to get me in and out of trades at the right time but much more importantly to stop me buying in at a completely inappropriate time (unlike the poster who was buying into HIBU (or YELL as it was a few weeks ago) when my charts said 'don't touch it with a barge pole'. More of this in the next post.

The other indicators I use are based on money flow, volume and a third indicator which interacts with the previous two. I also use day charts (real time prices) which have their own set of indicators and include Keltner bands and Bollinger bands and it's from these day charts that I base my 'day indicator' observations.

Re AVN, these 3 day indicators have all been negative for the past five days. They went from all positive on the 17th, 20th and 21st August when I bought in, to positive, neutral, neutral on the 24th and finally to negative, negative, negative by the 28th and 29th when a stop loss I had, triggered and again on the 30th when I subsequently got out and took a small loss.

added: I don't just use these day indicators in total isolation from all else.

johncsimpson
Chat Pages: Latest  508  507  506  505  504  503  502  501  500  499  498  497  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock