Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[iceagefarmer] 11/1/2022 19:29

anyone in vast resources? been told its going to 10 bag in a couple of weeks,,shaun dowling has invested £650k in them..obviously confident

[shareprofessor] 11/1/2022 18:35

ClottedQ I was merely allowing you the chance to reword your definition. I accept what you say is now what you believe but that suggests illegal activity. I was happy for anyone else to correct me but that was not forthcoming. I do not recognise that as a definition. Your views are of course your own and mine are mine. I am happy to agree to disagree. I have always appreciated that some have had a bad experience with Angus and I am sympathetic but it is distasteful that anyone here with a positive view is automatically considered to be a multiple profile poster. By that definition all with a negative view are the same person. I am sure you would agree that simply is not true. So far the only person to have confirmed they post on at least two sites under two different profiles is the oddity Ja51oiler.

[solo4yous] 11/1/2022 18:35

Nice holding

[1347] 11/1/2022 18:25

Another 8.3 Mr Steven James Downes, is it the James over in Kansas?

[clottedq] 11/1/2022 17:41

Solo4Yous Jan '22 - 15:30 - 16040 of 16054 (Filtered)


sincero1 Jan '22 - 15:39 - 16041 of 16054 (Filtered)


Solo4Yous Jan '22 - 15:43 - 16042 of 16054 (Filtered)


3Put Jan '22 - 15:53 - 16043 of 16054 (Filtered)

Poor old "Davemarn" seems to have fallen out of favour with the Multiple I.D Moron... maybe that voice inside his head doesn't shout as loud as the others? (p.s: put (IN)Sincerio - the excrement fetishist - in there for common decency)

CQ ;-)

[headinthesand] 11/1/2022 17:21

Offer before the Thursday (E)GM? Seriously?

[clottedq] 11/1/2022 16:46

Shareprofessor: "ClottedQ you are stating a pump and dump again . Your definition yesterday suggested this was being orchestrated by Angus . I think I am right to think that is illegal. Are you sticking to this premise ?"

Prof,

I think I explained my honest point of view and continue to express my personal belief - which by the examples I've given - is perfectly justified.

You are starting to sound a lot like (IN)Sincerio who also went down the route of accusing posters of illegal posting activity... and when that failed to work, he went on to then accuse them of being incontinent!?!?!

If you later start to mention urine or excrement (obviously (IN)Sincerio's personal fetish) then you're going to give the game away!

Problem is: there are a lot of cheerleaders here and on LSE for whom one voice is simply not enough. They feel they need to blast us from four or five different directions and frequently talk among - themself - mainly due to the fact that the rest of us have already sensibly used the FILTER BUTTON.

CQ ;-)

[3put] 11/1/2022 16:36

Another steady day, offer tomorrow?

[jtidsbadly] 11/1/2022 16:17

What a lot of nosey-parkers you shills are!

[solo4yous] 11/1/2022 16:11

So you sold sub 1p?

[headinthesand] 11/1/2022 16:03

I wasn't going to bite, Sincero. Yes I am minorly irked at my irrelevant £ note but annoyingly high percentage loss - but that's down to my not applying enough critical thinking to ANGS-supplied info when I bought in. So, my bad - though I do have to add that I'd have been barely better off, had I held to wait to sell into the current short-term spike.

[headinthesand] 11/1/2022 15:58

...savaged for expressing an opinion, eh? How very 1930s Berlin.

One has to ask, what would "credibility" from the heavenly ramptastic choir next door actually be worth? Why would it be worth seeking?

I wasn't aware that some seem to view share discussion boards as some kind of popularity contest?

[shareprofessor] 11/1/2022 15:55

Ja51oiler I perused your recent comments, no apology forthcoming for your stated errors. Lamentably for you your comments as WG818 have been equally poorly received on LSE and you have been savaged on several occasions. Perhaps it is time to man up apologise and start to rebuild some credibility on both sites, under both profiles.

1347 please try and add something beneficial , you have been outwitted by what you think is a dimwit , perhaps by graciously ceasing this futile pursuit you too can regain some credibility . The better man was victorious. You have in the past made some constructive points.

Share price remains static, volumes poor . Still no trend here for me . An effect on the share price from a rumour would be interesting to see.

[3put] 11/1/2022 15:53

I really believe advfn admin have a duty of care to give hits and JT a timeout. The deramping is unhealthy

[solo4yous] 11/1/2022 15:43

Noise I'm bored of this 1.25p

[sincero1] 11/1/2022 15:39

hits - significance of rns to meeting date is being overthought and overstated of course because it lends to a negative agenda. sellers sold as they are share dealing ....unless one of them is here posting or wants to post here to tell us why it is otherwise it is all .....suppo...well you know the rest .

yes 3 weeks till the end of jan ...take a break , then see if it is egg on face or smug post time.... so far smug has been winning hence the old geriatric urine smelling dads army all very irritated and posting as fast as they can ...

[solo4yous] 11/1/2022 15:30

HeadinmywhatverYou do nothing to inject confidence

[3put] 11/1/2022 15:21

Some effort to deramp , lol

[davemarn] 11/1/2022 14:51

Just come out with it all....

You guys expect the board to say a placing has been completed?

[headinthesand] 11/1/2022 14:47

I did indeed forecast that the share price would go up... as soon as ANGS announced its burningly urgent need of a new approval to issue shedloads of new shares at its hastily arranged and single agenda item (E)GM.

However at the same time, I also forecast that, following said rushed meeting and what I personally suspect will be announced very shortly afterwards, the share price then very definitely won't be going up.

Just an opinion, mind you. We haven't got long to wait to see what transpires.

[ja51oiler] 11/1/2022 14:01

1347
Yes, it puts me in mind of IBUG. Another repulsive poster years ago on Angus. He had a thing about nappies for a while?....any relation do you think?