Angus Energy Share Discussion Threads

[ultimatejustice9] 05/8/2021 11:31

Looks like it was a paid article. Although it's also possible that his opinion has changed as it was almost 2 years ago that he was negative on Angs.

[jtidsbadly] 05/8/2021 08:39

Still no SEL accounts. They’ve got ten days so they must be out tomorrow, unless Companies House are asleep again.

[cantrememberthis2] 04/8/2021 13:52

Huge depth Can sell 8m in one hit HTTPS://mobile.twitter.com/DeepValueHunte1/status/1422898929058918400

[ultimatejustice9] 04/8/2021 10:56

He is not someone I follow but I will take a look

[ja51oiler] 04/8/2021 10:53

UJ9 I think his "mind was changed" by being paid for his interviews! Angus PR company is "Flagstaff" as in Flagstaff TV whose logo appears in the scripted interviews. Have a look back at all the previous ones, (Any interview really) and ask yourself what he has said has actually aligned with reality!

[sincero1] 04/8/2021 10:30

uj9 - ja51"contractvoid"oiler always posts in haste to be negative before he thinks .... really is a complete cretin ..

[ultimatejustice9] 04/8/2021 10:28

Looks like his opinion might have changed Ja51

[sincero1] 04/8/2021 10:23

hits - i was just pointing out a fact ... nothing more or less. predictably it irritated those with a negative agenda into posting ......... tut tut .... it is just too easy sometimes ...

[ja51oiler] 04/8/2021 09:50

LMFAO.....He is also the "Award winner" Who described Angus as being "as close to uninvestable as you can get"

[sincero1] 04/8/2021 08:36

malcy was Financial Blogger of the Year but the resident window lickers will pour scorn on that because it doesn't suit their negative agenda.....

[cantrememberthis2] 03/8/2021 18:58

An oil n gas commentator Good summary HTTPS://mobile.twitter.com/DeepValueHunte1/status/1422610863186497538

[ultimatejustice9] 03/8/2021 18:51

Who is Malcy?

[clickbait] 03/8/2021 17:22

Hits. Not even if GL does another paid interview with Malcy in the meantime on geothermal 🦄

[headinthesand] 03/8/2021 15:42

UJ9, no. Plus even if I were, I'm sure I could pick any time between now and mid Q1 next year at the earliest and be able to pay pretty much the exact same price, so hardly any time pressure.

[ultimatejustice9] 03/8/2021 12:11

Head in the Sand, you said you sold on the recent rise to 1.1p. Are you considering getting back in ?

[sincero1] 03/8/2021 10:28

"can kick" is the classic reply from trolls and derampers when faced with a positive RNS ..... so predictable , so discredited ... " old duffers get a hobby "

[headinthesand] 03/8/2021 00:30

Who's deramping? I agree entirely - the latest ANGS RNS just rehashes and restates information that we've all known for some considerable time. There's no new news. This isn't a negative thing at all - but it's also not a positive thing either. Hence the market viewing this latest announcement as an irrelevant non-event and thus failing to react in any way. That's a statement of fact.

[ultimatejustice9] 02/8/2021 23:31

deary me! Don't take the bait. If he wants to de-ramp , who cares. If he wants to filter everyone, who cares. Most people filter the blatant ramps & de-ramps anyway. It's the same on every forum just now

[sincero1] 02/8/2021 17:54

and to prove my point ja51"contractvoid"oiler posts...such a cretin that he doesn't think before he posts in his haste to post negativity..you can also sense his relief after reading the q&a replies.. he can sleep now and put the brown slacks away......for now...

[ja51oiler] 02/8/2021 17:38

Hilarious stuff from the company and the resident "moron" Trying to downplay the so-called "Rumors" and disinformation by us well-researched posters by actually posting the following on the Q&A. "SF07, something of a special case, was originally drilled in 2003 and had four side tracks: the first two encountered low permeability whilst the latter two, SF07X and SF07W were drilled in 2016 and were beset with operational difficulties which may be the source of the rumour that side-tracking in this field was particularly difficult" And this "Later drilling on the field, in particular, exploratory drilling aimed at the southern satellite structure (via SF06 and SF08) did encounter both less productive zones and these boreholes did require no less than five side tracks betwen them (much as the original SF01 had) and had limited but not negligible success." So hardly a rumor or anything like it is it!! It's called FACTS! It would have helped the companies cause if it had answered truthfully when asked the first time on the Q&A page over a year ago wouldn't it.....When they forgot to mention 2 of the failed sidetracks in the answer and told us not to worry as they weren't drilling from SF7 but SF5 as it says in the now totally irrelevant CPR........Only it couldn't have ever been from SF5 as it hasn't got EA permission on it (as confirmed again in todays RNS) What's worse is they didn't even realise they needed to apply for PP for the sidetrack (Again stated in a Q&A answer) So rather than trying to pretend that BB posters are "Starting Rumors" or "spreading disinformation" Why don't they try to actually get something right for once?? HTTPS://www.angusenergy.co.uk/media/investor-questions/ PS, The sharp-eyed will have noticed today's RNS fails to mention First Gas this year as previous ones have.

[sincero1] 02/8/2021 17:00

uclot - angus can boast shell and mercuria as partners ...that is undeniable . if those guys are in so am i . positive news flow is the new norm. any attempt of desperate negative posting from the resident window lickers is ridiculous, i know it and you know it.....and more importantly angus appear to know it judging by the last 2 months q&a replies....

[clottedq] 02/8/2021 15:14

Insincerio1: Both companies are still out on the can kicking trail... just a case of which one runs out of steam (i.e: money + shareholder & Market belief) first! IMHO, it seems more like an old boys competition between Sanderson and Lucan to see who can be last man standing - rather than a sound risk v reward investment proposal - in either - these days. They've squandered more money on complete and utter failures between them than most other AIM companies combined! Where's the FCA been looking for the past eighteen months I wonder? CQ ;-)

[sincero1] 02/8/2021 15:02

jtisadly you claim to have filtered posters but then acknowledge and reply to them .. .. do you ever tell the truth ? uclot - easy ukog .... .. angus is a completely different situation only way is up imho ( as you would say )