Amd Commo Exagr Discussion Threads

[loverat] 20/9/2009 08:18

Well, I wonder if the statement published by LDC and whatever has taken place behind the scenes in recent months will have any implications for shareholders of COMG and CEG.

[loverat] 20/9/2009 08:09

Mack

The number of removed posts on the threads of four companies - NML, AFD, CDG and EPD without exaggeration runs literally into the hundreds. Then if you add LGB, RSV and others you could have many more.

Take AFD above where a very large number were removed. There were numerous spats between between Agincourt, Wdurham, Mclellan - and Anomalous. So some would have been removed as a result of things getting out of hand. Anomalous also had a problem with certain members of the AFD management so it is probably safe to assume that quite a few objectionable posts were removed for that reason.

[mack7heknife] 20/9/2009 07:37

any idea what the posts were removed for ?

[loverat] 19/9/2009 22:01

AFD Thread

Anomalous - 7 Oct'04 - 20:51 - 26461 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 10 Oct'04 - 11:48 - 26962 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 11 Oct'04 - 18:48 - 27232 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 1 Nov'04 - 14:31 - 28456 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 5 Nov'04 - 14:56 - 28683 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 7 Nov'04 - 21:18 - 28769 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 7 Nov'04 - 21:27 - 28773 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 7 Nov'04 - 21:51 - 28786 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 13 Nov'04 - 17:05 - 29025 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 30 Nov'04 - 22:18 - 29486 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 2 Dec'04 - 19:35 - 29576 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 6 Dec'04 - 20:21 - 29837 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 13 Dec'04 - 23:22 - 30049 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 16 Dec'04 - 11:12 - 30138 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN
Anomalous - 17 Dec'04 - 13:12 - 30223 of 41476
Post removed by ADVFN

Well, just think how much more interesting the AFD thread would be if these posts were not removed. 15 over a two month period on just that thread.

[loverat] 19/9/2009 20:02

Some music folks...

Enjoy -

[loverat] 19/9/2009 19:33

California Joe - 3 May'09 - 23:41 - 751 of 808

Loverat, I agreed to stand as a director some years ago and heard nothing since. I would NOT stand as a director now anyway! I have never even logged on to the website! I have no idea who George Smallnutts is either!




Never mind CJ and Cougar6 - perhaps you will get the opportunity to be introduced to each other fairly soon.

[loverat] 19/9/2009 19:16

Seems anomolous was buying as at 09/2005. What was all the deramping about before then?



SimFlint25 - 19 Sep'05 - 18:12 - 1341 of 5408
Is there any news on what's happening next week? Whats causing the price rise? I'm not ungrateful,
but I'd like to know why its going up so I can get some more before it does.

[wooosh2] 19/9/2009 18:56

LONG & STRONG :-


anyway, brb :)

[loverat] 19/9/2009 18:53

mclellan - 11 Jan'06 - 15:55 - 4311 of 5408
The only person who has ever given advice on this thread is Anomalous, many a time and often, telling us to sell our shares!



mclellan - just so I get this straight - anomolous was not a holder of NML shares
when you posted and probably sold out sometime before?

[loverat] 19/9/2009 13:26

Anyway - back to more recent events. From the LDC website - looks like positive news for shareholders.

And refreshing to see the directors utilising the correct channels for communication with shareholders.(rather than the previous directors who used communicate on the BB and by e-mail calling shareholders blind and advising them to invest their money in the Building Society)

18th September 2009

Dear Shareholder

In my last update on 12th June I anticipated that we would circulate accounts during August with a view to holding our AGM during September. However, the task of discovering and analysing the historical financial information for the many group companies has presented challenges which have taken longer to deal with than we would have hoped. It is now our plan to circulate the accounts for 2007 in early November, possibly holding the AGM on 27th November, at which time we will detail certain matters which we believe should be drawn to the attention of shareholders. We then plan to hold further AGMs on or around 31st January and 31st March 2010 to approve the 2008 and 2009 accounts respectively.

We still lack some financial information, but our best estimate is that the net worth of London Asia Capital plc today approaches £20 million. Clearly, this is not the amount that could be realised today in cash and may rise or fall with markets in the future, though values in Asia have been advancing quite well recently. The group currently holds cash and quoted investments to the value of approximately £8 million. Further to this the group also holds a number of unquoted investments which your directors believe may have long term value, in particular a £9 million investment in Zhongying Changjiang based in Wuhan.

Following the cancellation of approximately 98 million shares (the current issued share total is 229,508,582) relating to the four share swap companies, explained in my letter of 7th May, this equates to about 3.5p per share in cash and quoted investments and in excess of 8 p of net assets per share. In addition we are actively seeking the return of further funds owned but not currently held by the group.

Following a review of the commercial arrangements the directors of London Asia Capital plc and the directors China IPO plc have agreed in principle to terminate the contract signed earlier in the year. The 10 million options granted to China IPO at 5p per share remain in place. These changes will have no effect on the structure or operation of the Board of London Asia Capital plc.

In summary, your Board is delighted at that progress we have made so far and continue to make on behalf of shareholders and look forward to providing further information at the forthcoming AGM.

Yours sincerely

Keith Negal

Chief Executive

[loverat] 19/9/2009 12:20

Just thinking back to that argument between Anom and Agincourt. Reminds me of two other great friends who fell out big time on this site. Happened when I held shares in EVS and I followed the thread. Well, CJ and another poster called Peteark were invested heavily and got quite involved with the management and used to meet the Sales Director for business and socially etc. I think Peteark even worked for the company at one point.

Anyway, seems they both got screwed over by the management and there was a massive fall out which got very, very personal and spilled over to the thread. Entertaining stuff at the time but investors were not so amused when CJ made a post purporting to be the sales director of EVS in an attempt to ramp up the stock - followed by EVS going down the pan not long after. Lots of allegations of dodgy dealings etc and things got very nasty.

Still, seems like he reformed his ways. I believe he went on and became a director of the Investors Support Fund - along with Anom and cougar6.

[mots] 19/9/2009 11:55

Sounds like the ideal man to run a Kakistocracy.

[mack7heknife] 19/9/2009 11:53

how much would one pay ?

[jonc] 19/9/2009 11:32

Almost libellous!!!!!!

[mots] 19/9/2009 11:30

"........was your insistance that the recent decision which had gone against you in court had only happened because, you insisted, the judge had been bribed."

Yes Mack,incredible.A consummate idiot.

[jonc] 19/9/2009 10:20

I'd be interested to know what mistakes he has admitted to.



Agincourt is very much like McCririck, as they are both self-opinionated and absolutely refuse to believe that they could be wrong. Some might say that I am self-opinionated. I accept that, but at least I can admit a mistake when I've made one.

[mack7heknife] 19/9/2009 10:13

"You will remember that the issue we fell out about in a big way in that last phone call, from you to me, was your insistance that the recent decision which had gone against you in court had only happened because, you insisted, the judge had been bribed."


good grief .............

[loverat] 19/9/2009 08:00

By the way - Agincourt if you still post on this site I would be grateful for any information you have regarding LDC.

[loverat] 18/9/2009 22:11

Agincourt - 16 Jan'05 - 23:10 - 31004 of 41476

You threaten me with "Esther Rantzen"
That is something I told you in your home in confidence in the context of warning you about not undertaking legal action lightly.


Simply hilarious.........

[jonc] 18/9/2009 21:55

I must say this anomalous chap seems very knowledgeable.

[loverat] 18/9/2009 21:43

Agincourt - 16 Jan'05 - 22:58 - 31002 of 41476

Dear John


Your account is still in credit by £24.44, but can you please make a
payment of £100, as a few members are in financial trouble and unable to
contribute the full amount. Myself, George and others are paying our
accounts into credit to make sure that there is enough to continue.




I see George was kind enough to put in extra subs. Mind you - I would imagine
that he could afford it.