ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

COMG Amd Commo Exagr

1,982.60
-9.40 (-0.47%)
Last Updated: 15:00:57
Delayed by 15 minutes
Name Symbol Market Type
Amd Commo Exagr LSE:COMG London Exchange Traded Fund
  Price Change % Change Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Traded Last Trade
  -9.40 -0.47% 1,982.60 1,987.60 1,990.40 1,982.60 1,982.00 1,982.00 11,946 15:00:57

Amd Commo Exagr Discussion Threads

Showing 501 to 517 of 1625 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  22  21  20  19  18  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/8/2009
20:21
I bet by the time this is finished there will be many Freddie Mercury fans!
loverat
23/8/2009
20:16
Thanks Korner - I think I know where you're coming from. It will be checked out anyway.


In the meantime enjoy this...

loverat
23/8/2009
19:52
Loverat, I know the company was never registered as a charity. It has charitable objects but s.652 bites regardless of that. The CC guidance notes do however explain s. 652 in simple terms. Companies House is now quite pro-active in prompt action for non-compliance. I'll stop there as this is not an area of recent expertise on my part ...not often you will hear such a confession on a free bulletin board!
korner
23/8/2009
19:30
korner

Fact is this company was never registered as a charity. Unless you are saying that this was due to some failure to comply with Company House procedures - i.e not producing accounts etc - there are plenty of companies registered which have not filed accounts. COMG is one example.

loverat
23/8/2009
18:33
Loverat, this might be a more relevant link :
korner
23/8/2009
18:17
And if a voluntary application the question has to be why?

A bold and noble idea set up by four investors (albeit some of whom had never heard of each other) in a blaze of publicity. The Investors Support Fund was even mentioned in the recent Smith V ADVFN court case and seems the founding member said that statements made against him on the LGB thread would have a detrimental effect on the reputation of the subsequent charity when it was registered.

Not sure whether a High Court Judge would have gone along with that notion but the whole issue of the charity and subsequent goings on may well still be relevant to that case.

loverat
23/8/2009
17:45
patiance :-


c ya

wooosh2
23/8/2009
17:43
Some guidance and information on the process.
loverat
23/8/2009
17:37
So, is this a voluntary strike off application or one initiated by the registrar?

Who knows but based on the guidance I have read I would guess it is a voluntary application.

loverat
23/8/2009
17:15
The Investors Support Fund


30/07/2009 First notification of strike-off action in London Gazette (section 652)
24/07/2009 First notice from Companies House to dissolve company in 3 months
05/06/2009 Change among directors of a company

loverat
23/8/2009
09:55
Just a reminder for folks. This is Cougar6 successfully predicting that a director of LAC had purchased 10M shares and speculating that 'a bid would come'


RSV............(NB Photo Distribution is Allnutt's company)

cougar6 - 15 Oct'03 - 15:10 - 144 of 747
10 mill shares bought by director of London Asia Capital. today I am told

cougar6 - 15 Oct'03 - 15:27 - 156 of 747
10 mill buy to come through


15th October, 2003

Room Service Group Plc ( "the Company")

Notifiable interest

The Company was notified earlier today that, following a purchase of 10,000,000
ordinary shares, Photo Distribution Limited is now beneficially interested in
10,000,000 ordinary shares in the Company, representing 8.05 per cent. of the
issued share capital of the Company.


cougar6 - 16 Oct'03 - 18:43 - 23 of 3365

Its a gamble on this type of share but I feel a bid will come

loverat
22/8/2009
17:44
Thanks to all the people who have provided information and support so far. As I say, we are ready for the first stage. The first stage is intended to deal with the 'numpties' in all of this. These are the people who have posted carelessly on here in the past. Nevertheless, these so called 'numpties' are the ones who have declared themselves whiter than white and no doubt the authorities and press will be more than eager to go after these people. Because of a recent development I have now included evidence regarding one person I previously said I would not refer. So there are now three people in total.

There is one reader of this thread from abroad who I believe may have information to help us with going forward with the second stage (and perhaps more serious part) of the proceedings. Please contact me if you are able to.

loverat
22/8/2009
10:34
Morning


Would the shareholder who mailed me from China some time back get in touch. My e-mails seem to be bouncing back from your address. I believe you said that you posted as olefin2 on the LDC old thread. Want to ensure that everyone who has contacted me has a voice regarding the next steps being taken.

loverat
21/8/2009
20:39
cougar

Why did you post what you did?

Are you an expert on Langbar?

loverat
21/8/2009
20:37
No money back cougar?

Perhaps in one of your companies. I think David did rather well.

loverat
21/8/2009
20:22
And cougar6 pops up on LGB....

cougar6 - 5 Mar'06 - 08:28 - 43018 of 59023
The Facts are clear the company will not get back any of its money , the legal team no this and are just taking
your money £500k on fees
you need to take action before all is lost ?

loverat
21/8/2009
19:38
Ever so slightly......
loverat
Chat Pages: Latest  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  22  21  20  19  18  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock