We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.175 | 1.80% | 9.875 | 9.50 | 10.25 | 9.875 | 9.875 | 9.88 | 214,593 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.65 | 91.58M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
25/8/2017 11:47 | Inan , IQ has nothing to do with education level. If you have an IQ of 125 and studied up to doctorate at university you would still have an IQ of 125. | gazza | |
25/8/2017 11:46 | Terror, I don't post any trades now, for some reason others use it as a weapon .. And as you have seen, if i use it as a weapon it becomes devastating, because liars can never remember what they wrote, "freebies with an average" posting the truth is easy to remember | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:45 | TEA LEAF /s - My ability to be ABLE to READ - must have misled me. When *WE* READ = "Loz ... do you actually think your smart ?" ... {note "your" not 'you are' or 'you're' I,and any other NORMAL person - could be forgiven ,,for assuming the question to be = 'Do *I* actually think *I* am smart' ? That being the case , *I* replied = TEA LEAF- "Loz ... do you actually think your smart ?" . Not particularly, in general terms- However When compared to YOU / YOUR aliases and YOUR 'Flock' = It appears so. . ....silly me / US.... for being educated | the real lozan | |
25/8/2017 11:39 | LTH's lose out AIM is not for LTHs as they miss out on maximising gains | terror | |
25/8/2017 11:38 | Terror ..... LTH | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:35 | Still falling Nana | terror | |
25/8/2017 11:32 | IQ 154 would indicate a "professor" education level and certainly would be interested in posting and researching yourself on the science of Scancell .. You would storm past my poor showing of IQ 130 with ease | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:29 | Loz ... so what happened to your claims of IQ 154 at that level you would be pretty intelligent .. | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:25 | TEA LEAF- "Loz ... do you actually think your smart ?" . Not particularly, in general terms- However When compared to YOU / YOUR aliases and YOUR 'Flock' = It appears so. | the real lozan | |
25/8/2017 11:25 | Hidden meaning ....behind the words here Loz introduces """""Finally, I shall / do "declare my own trades" with Mrs. Lozan... normally as we enjoy a drinkypoo post BBQ - out on one of our terraces""" out on one of our terraces is that "snobbery" | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:24 | I bow to your superiority oh wise one ! | fragma | |
25/8/2017 11:16 | Yes, Inanaco, 154 is a good IQ score. In fact, 154 IQ means that I am very gifted and highly advanced. A 154 IQ would put My head in the upper crust of highly intelligent people in this society. | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:14 | A wiser and MORE astute person would have actually bought some shares and traded them instead of spending years on here with sour grapes and personal vendettas only wishing the price to go down. You are more of a Loozer than the folks who are under water here. | fragma | |
25/8/2017 11:13 | Duh ! your basing your posts only on "Probability" ie up or down. Your doing so based on other stock movements in other shares, expecting the same outcome. Loz ... do you actually think your smart ? | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 11:06 | A WISER, more ASTUTE reader, would have 'focused / perceived' WHY I included the word = FLAT. The other day, when all was Whoopee'... I 'included' the word = RETRACE What did *WE* see = a "RETRACE" This morning- as food for thought,,, I 'included' the word = "FLAT" What DO *WE* see today = "FLAT" | the real lozan | |
25/8/2017 10:53 | Terror your basing your posts only on "Probability" ie up or down. Your doing so based on other stock movements in other shares, expecting the same outcome. Yet forgetting the "Probability" of a deal RNS or some other driver, which you don't have control over or could ever predict So any "statue" post ... is at best a guess .... as you will always have a 50/50 chance of being "Astute" | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 10:42 | Terror . Once the science gets valued, we will then see how "right" the stock market was .... because that really is the true test | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 10:41 | Whatever Loozer, just go back to talking about yourself, it is what you are best at ! | fragma | |
25/8/2017 10:26 | Wig "Astute" is an anagram for "statue" ... it never changes ... in perpetuity hidden meaning behind the words | inanaco | |
25/8/2017 10:04 | "3 options = up / down / flat"Lozan spells out the genius behind the "astute's" 100% right at every turn strategy.Though at 10p I don't recall the "up" option. | wigwammer | |
25/8/2017 10:04 | Fragrant - Yoou never were 'blessed' in being able to read what is behind/ beyond the words, intentionally 'expressed'{but with 'deeper meaning' for those who CAN see other thoughts} by "stating the bleedin' obvious." | the real lozan | |
25/8/2017 09:50 | On the question of multi I Ds - It is noticable, that -those 'suspected' of 'duplicity' in this area = Only appear , when ONE 'main-man' is about ALL disappear - when the ONE 'main-man' is NOT about ALL posts have the 'time-gap' required for ONE 'main-man' to be able to post them { NEVER at or around the same posting moments - which MIGHT occur naturally} ALL items - bounce off / centre on the ONE 'main-man' and, as pointed out last night 'deliberately' ALL -those 'suspected' of 'duplicity' in this area = Share the same 'Speeling, unt Grannmir difikultees' ALL - Have the 'same SLATE OFF' . Does anyone REALLY believe, I might think folks are in any way 'interested' in what I am cooking / BBQing??? I posted that - to see where it went It TURNED-UP on ElSIE S Central { would you believe it} being DISCUSSED by TWO of .... -those 'suspected' of 'duplicity' in this area | the real lozan | |
25/8/2017 09:34 | umm, yeah. Talk about stating the bleedin' obvious. | fragma | |
25/8/2017 09:16 | Appears most folks are waiting to see which way this is going to go today. 3 options = up / down / flat Lack of news c/w a long week-end of no news available will not 'help' the "News any day now" brigade. For those of a different 'mind-set'/ were not expecting news/RNS - makes no difference. It's what happens/ does not happen.. next week that will 'set the course' | the real lozan |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions