Easyjet Share Discussion Threads

[mastey] 23/3/2017 13:43

Oil still struggling, cable 1.2512 and Easy not detailed on cancellation and delayed data from flight ware.

[19bells] 23/3/2017 13:14

Looking strong again. Positive news ?

[luckymouse] 23/3/2017 13:11

QuePassa 23 Mar '17 - 13:04 - 5687 of 5687 0 1 (Filtered)

Sry QP - that's all I can see :)

[quepassa] 23/3/2017 13:04

2 x 0 = 0

3 x 0 = 0


lol.

QP

[luckymouse] 23/3/2017 12:58

FTSE 0%
EZJ +2%

lol

[19bells] 23/3/2017 08:20

Good time to spend the divi money?

[19bells] 23/3/2017 08:15

Yesterday over a 24hr period Q post 9 times seriously! Total waster constantly moaning. Negative negative negative Dribble dribble dribble How does she have the time to constantly logged in ? When I have time I'll filter out the loser.

[quepassa] 22/3/2017 22:48

more garbage and tripe from our resident moron.

24/7.

he is a totally worthless non-entity.

just ignore.

QP

[tlobs2] 22/3/2017 20:27

If any poster ever wondered where the term "thick as pig $hit" came from then look no further than QuePassa and his boring monotonous/predictable posts over the past few months.

[penycae] 22/3/2017 15:57

Voldemort - "EasyJet down 2.7% whilst FTSE100 index down 0.9% - but that according to some is merely tracking today's index performance."

I think you'll find that's exactly the point LuckyMouse was making. He never said EZJ was tracking the index. He did say that some equities fall sharper and further than the index itself on any given day. You're getting lost in your own spin, but WTFDIK? I'm a novice trader, addicted to cider who talks to a monkey.

Time to move on. I think I'm going to put you back in the bin. Say hello to Rodey. He's the only person other than you on the whole of ADFN who I have found to be annoying enough to filter.

[quepassa] 22/3/2017 14:54

Interesting how twitchy and defensive so many become when TA and how squiggly lines predicting the future are mentioned.

There's a reason for that........

EasyJet down 2.7% whilst FTSE100 index down 0.9% - but that according to some is merely tracking today's index performance.

Yeah, right......


ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[19bells] 22/3/2017 13:51

Q - you stated since the weekend I've posted 7 times. Well at the same point since the start of the week you've posted 11 times - now that's sad. Haha

[penycae] 22/3/2017 13:35

Voldemort - you have completely misunderstood LuckyMouse's position. The FTSE is an index of 100 stocks, some of which carry a different weighting. If every stock went up 2% on a simple index, that index would indeed rise pro rata.
Even using the model of a simple index, you must surely see that one stock could rise or fall by a different percentage to the index as a whole.
I really do think you should be a bit more careful in your posts, whatever your agenda. You know nothing about me or anyone else who might post on here. You give away a lot about yourself with your particular style of posting.
You don't like EZJ at these prices. We get that. Job done.

[suffersnofools] 22/3/2017 12:51

Yep. The use of 'he' when referring to other posters is also very telling. It's the preferred style of egotist/narcissist, who sees himself as being the 'unelected' spokesperson to the bb. Comical if a little tragic. ;)

[luckymouse] 22/3/2017 12:43

HeeHee - yes - its getting a bit care in the community - time to filter him :)

[quepassa] 22/3/2017 12:39

he's been reading too much Harry Potter and lives in some sort of fictitious world of multiple incarnations and paid bashers, stooges and different personalities.

grandad, it seems that years and years on the scrumpy have indeed taken their toll.



As far the assertion is concerned:-

""Stocks always move at least two to three times as much as the aggregated index - has ever been thus"

Let's just try to prove that non-sensical statement.


Q: If EVERY SINGLE stock in the FTSE100 rises by 2% on a given day, what happens?

A: Does the FTSE100 index rise by ?

1) 2%
2) 4%
3) 6%


My answer is 2%.

If anyone thinks that LuckyMouse is correct with answers of 4% and 6%, i would be interested to know .

Happy to offer my abject apologies if wrong.

ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[suffersnofools] 22/3/2017 12:39

LM - You're wasting your breath. You'd be better off explaining to your dog ;)

Come back on a day when EZJ outperforms the FTSE and try and get a response.

I stopped posting here a couple of months back exactly because of the inanity of the comments. The thinking goes that the more you post the same nonsense, and the more upper case letters you use in doing so, the more weight the nonsense carries - lol. Long or short I don't care just post in a coherent, civilized, non-confrontational manner is all I ask.

[penycae] 22/3/2017 12:24

LuckyMouse - some good posts and logical argument.
I too believe that there are one or two paid "bashers" who are regular posters on this forum. I believe that more than one person might have access to a particular login, judging by the differing style and tone of the posts. I suspect that the posters might also be of differing gender.
At the end of the day it matters not, but to be referred to as a "greenhorn trader" really makes me smile.....

Trade well and prosper.

[luckymouse] 22/3/2017 12:19

Huh? That's just nonsense arguology? I explained (in detail) - you ignored - possibly because...

...it is a bashers standard tactic to try discredit anyone who disagrees with their bashing lol

[quepassa] 22/3/2017 12:13

Same old. Same old.
Deflect the topic when you are on a sticky and losing wicket, like now.

You have failed to support your statement because it is nonsense so you change tack.

What you have written here is an impossibility, It is a contradiction of itself:-

"Stocks always move at least two to three times as much as the aggregated index - has ever been thus"


Funny that innit ! - you bring up a topic which I take you to task on and then you fail miserably to support your assertion.

Your beating about the bush and flailing around madly to avoid answering the question are evident for all to see.

ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP

[luckymouse] 22/3/2017 12:01

Yet again, you are wrong lol - I'm not in - it came up on an over sold screener so I investigated - spotted that it was stuck in a perilous triangle & doesn't meet my criteria. In fact I would say - those same squiggly lines have saved me from going long at the mo - so the complete opposite of what you say!
It must feel awkward for you being wrong quite a lot - despite being so shouty lol

Yet again I note it is a bashers standard tactic to try discredit anyone who disagrees with their bashing lol

PS I also note you chose to totally ignore the entirely correct mathematical & psychological explanation in my previous post. rofl

[quepassa] 22/3/2017 11:54

The FTSE is de facto down 0.8%.

That is the result of the market capitalisation of all the FTSE 100 companies added together, compared to yesterday's close.

Your statement of "Stocks always move at least two to three times as much as the aggregated index - has ever been thus" is just sheer nonsense.

What you write is an impossibility.

You just do not have a clue as to what you are talking about.

You are just another example of a greenhorn trader who is clearly getting exercised when the squiggly lines he uses and relies upon to predict the future ( aka technical analysis, technical trading and graphing) go pear-shaped -like they have been doing for many, many, many months now on EasyJet.

ALL IMO. DYOR.
QP